New law prohibits promotion of child-like sex dolls and imposes felony penalties

In a significant move aimed at protecting children from exploitation, the Minnesota State Legislature has introduced Senate Bill 1577, which seeks to prohibit the creation and promotion of child-like sex dolls. Introduced on February 20, 2025, this bill addresses a growing concern regarding the sexualization of minors and the potential normalization of harmful behaviors.

Under the proposed legislation, it would be illegal for individuals to promote or use minors in the modeling of child-like sex dolls, with violators facing severe penalties, including up to ten years in prison and fines reaching $10,000. The bill defines a "minor" as anyone under the age of 18 and outlines clear definitions for terms related to the promotion and creation of these dolls.

The bill's introduction has sparked notable discussions among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Proponents argue that the legislation is a necessary step in safeguarding children and sending a strong message against sexual exploitation. They emphasize the psychological and societal implications of allowing such products to exist, fearing it could lead to increased desensitization towards child abuse.

However, the bill has not been without its critics. Some opponents raise concerns about the potential for overreach, arguing that the legislation could inadvertently infringe on artistic expression or legitimate adult products. They call for a more nuanced approach that balances protection with personal freedoms.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its implications extend beyond the immediate legal framework. Experts suggest that if passed, it could set a precedent for similar laws in other states, potentially reshaping the landscape of child protection legislation nationwide. The ongoing debates surrounding Senate Bill 1577 reflect a broader societal struggle to address the complexities of child safety in an increasingly digital and commercial world.

With the bill's future uncertain, many are watching closely to see how Minnesota's lawmakers will navigate these contentious issues, and what the outcomes may mean for the protection of vulnerable populations in the state and beyond.