Santa Cruz residents oppose new lithium battery storage facilities citing safety risks

The Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors convened on January 28, 2025, to address several pressing issues, primarily focusing on the controversial topic of lithium battery storage facilities in the county. The meeting began with public comments highlighting concerns over climate change, insurance industry practices, and the safety of proposed battery storage projects.

One speaker urged the board to consider non-toxic alternatives for energy storage, emphasizing the need for insurance companies to divest from fossil fuels due to their role in climate change damages. This sentiment was echoed by multiple participants who expressed dissatisfaction with the current state of energy policies and the perceived negligence of the insurance sector.

Tim Delaney, a retired defense engineer, criticized the rhetoric surrounding energy discussions, particularly targeting the language used by political factions. He raised concerns about the environmental impact of energy production and the need for accountability from energy companies, specifically mentioning Vistra Energy.

The discussion then shifted to the proposed lithium battery storage facilities. Carol, a concerned resident, urged the board to suspend any plans for these facilities, citing the recent fire at the Moss Landing Battery Facility as a significant risk to public safety and the environment. She highlighted the dangers associated with lithium batteries, including their flammability and the toxic compounds released during fires.

Other speakers, including Enoch and Marilyn Garrett, echoed these concerns, emphasizing the economic motivations behind the facilities rather than environmental benefits. They called for a moratorium on new projects until safety protocols and community impacts could be thoroughly evaluated.

Assemblymember Dawn Addis was represented by Alexis Irizola, who introduced the Battery Energy Safety and Accountability Act, aimed at enhancing safety regulations for battery storage facilities. This legislation seeks to ensure that such facilities are located away from sensitive areas like schools and residential neighborhoods.

The meeting also included discussions on the need for stricter regulations and community involvement in the decision-making process regarding battery storage. Several speakers advocated for the establishment of an advisory board to oversee safety measures and ensure compliance with local regulations.

In conclusion, the Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors meeting highlighted significant community concerns regarding the safety and environmental implications of lithium battery storage facilities. The board is expected to consider these public comments and the proposed legislation as they move forward with their decision-making process. The next steps will likely involve further discussions on safety protocols and community engagement in future energy projects.