Montana legislators propose Work Protection Act to ban local guaranteed income programs

The Montana Legislature convened on February 20, 2025, to introduce House Bill 604, a significant piece of legislation aimed at establishing statewide uniformity regarding guaranteed income programs. The bill, sponsored by a coalition of legislators, seeks to prohibit local governments from implementing their own guaranteed basic income initiatives, asserting that such programs undermine the value of work.

House Bill 604, also referred to as the "Work Protection Act," explicitly states that unless a political subdivision is expressly authorized by state law, it cannot adopt or enforce any ordinance or rule that facilitates payments to individuals under a guaranteed income program. This provision aims to centralize control over income support initiatives at the state level, thereby preventing a patchwork of local policies that could lead to inconsistencies and confusion.

Key provisions of the bill include the enforcement mechanism, which empowers the Montana Attorney General to issue cease and desist orders against any local government that attempts to implement a guaranteed income program in violation of the law. Should a political subdivision fail to comply, the Attorney General is authorized to seek injunctive relief in court.

The introduction of House Bill 604 has sparked notable debate among lawmakers and constituents. Proponents argue that the bill is essential for maintaining a strong work ethic and preventing dependency on government assistance. They contend that a uniform approach to income support will ensure that resources are allocated efficiently and effectively.

Conversely, opponents of the bill express concerns that it undermines local autonomy and disregards the unique economic challenges faced by different communities. Critics argue that local governments should have the flexibility to address poverty and economic inequality through tailored programs that meet the specific needs of their residents.

The implications of House Bill 604 extend beyond legislative procedure; it touches on broader economic and social issues, including the ongoing discussions about poverty alleviation and the role of government in providing financial support to individuals. As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its potential impact on local governance and economic policy in Montana will be closely monitored.

In conclusion, House Bill 604 represents a significant shift in how guaranteed income programs may be approached in Montana, emphasizing state control over local initiatives. As discussions continue, the outcomes of this bill could reshape the landscape of income support and local governance in the state.