[{"_1":2,"_121":-5,"_122":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,85,97,109],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6317941,"mediaKeyId","2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed","parentId",2368650,"title","Commission recommends code changes to replace Board of Adjustments with single appeal authority","audioSeconds",2393,"startMs",477000,"endMs",2870000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed&start=477&end=2870","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed/thumbnail_477000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6317941/Utah/Commission-recommends-code-changes-to-replace-Board-of-Adjustments-with-single-appeal-authority","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6317941-bce318f59ad94eaa5e8fead71270bdd2/orig.mp4?Expires=1775364515&Signature=PfCsetu-6aZCoNIsNi4Wf4ShnjHVoZEPqsz9kkUh6hed7AO5Nd7x436qEbTZT05LWJiysJ0ku3mMERR2DXO-h0sGyIRx4SirT3wyPozyEAO6R0pZnxHy5EmQUwI2VozI~gS4bLTnTgoVKI0fF37YVx-1v529uWGVV4dUlTK2TpRFlwZ1-4Ua85Y-7ENx7wdX9ctpiqdVAG5PVk0IzWdd9b7XWl-xdaoW7nLu13v3Jkea9sy-UXI6KDz9uBlEHALnctWFnSFtnvd4kyVm9bvqIOfrFL5ILskCe-y2dvr7t4QTEcaENbImyMuFHBsZ7zpP5NC~Og5A-wgySE7F~l8KbQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-02-20T14:37:23Z","article","The Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission voted Feb. 19 to recommend amendments to Parowan City Municipal Code 15.14 that rename the Board of Adjustments to an appeal authority and change how that body is constituted and operated.

Under the proposed amendments, the code would use the name “appeal authority” throughout, change the composition from five members to a single member appointed by the mayor with City Council advice and consent, remove term limits and allow removal without cause, and eliminate sections about officers, quorums and voting procedures while making other changes to meeting procedures.

Staff told commissioners the recommendation is primarily a code cleanup and structural change; if City Council supports the change, the city would begin the process to procure or negotiate for someone to serve in the appeal authority role (by RFP or negotiation) at a later date. Dan said council approval would be required before advancing to recruitment or contract work.

A motion to recommend the amendments to PCMC 15.14 passed by voice vote. Commissioners noted this is primarily a housekeeping and structural change but that City Council will evaluate the governance implications and the city will not recruit for the role until Council indicates support.

If Council adopts the amendment, the city would proceed with steps to identify and contract with a qualified individual to serve as the single‑member appeal authority, subject to Council appointment and advice/consent procedures.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Parowan City Planning and Zoning Meeting 2/19/2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission voted Feb. 19 to recommend amendments to Parowan City Municipal Code 15.14 to replace the Board of Adjustments with a single‑member appeal authority appointed by the mayor with City Council advice and consent.","taxTitle","Parowan Planning and Zoning, Parowan City Council, Parowan , Iron County, Utah","taxId",23614,"location","Utah","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":44,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":50,"_51":81,"_53":82,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":83,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":84,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6317946,"Commission forwards relaxed cargo‑container rules with edits; staff will clean grammar before Council",2130,2607000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed&start=477&end=2607","/articles/6317946/Utah/Commission-forwards-relaxed-cargocontainer-rules-with-edits-staff-will-clean-grammar-before-Council","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6317946-60526299fe4aa9594440ddc1df2b94ee/orig.mp4?Expires=1775364515&Signature=mBEe0QLWusMsI62mGG432OEXBaXv9sUjGR8Yj3cBaXJv9m2ZZwFqxvvZYQkX8L9oIUoU6sfbwyPRhjNqkWJ0wLpP07zRA2LgNhTFhjiMO~alTln3HfG447UvtA5YSwnHJ5HLzMmgggzX3gmdY5cpXn87mpBxy8apQqV3q72fRse~RKmIRvT4~a3pFaRRcBckvFe8i6jIt-vV43qPsugaL~5uO2pgkSYSpGMYcwRHf745dqPsZ5XM2PpwcTgd3YsW0KHyqNPpF0cyMFnlj1Htq4wZyNvDnkGiEHH9m19aXDo~V5KNrQMpSoYhDcH7qlgXD6~fLLWxLYbhxg79FKQonQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Parowan commissioners on Feb. 19 voted to recommend amendments to Parowan City Municipal Code 15.65, which governs cargo storage containers, after several prior meetings and a detailed, clause‑by‑clause review.

Staff said the changes are intended to relax certain restrictions while retaining controls that prevent containers from creating obstructions and to preserve neighborhood character. Commissioners asked staff to clarify inconsistent wording about allowed placement (side yard vs. rear yard) and to add a clear cross‑reference that side‑yard placement must be permitted by the Planning and Zoning Commission.

Dan (city staff) summarized the edits and explained the rationale: the code will treat containers as accessory buildings subject to accessory building area rules (the 25% rule), allow up to two containers in commercial and highway service zones (with conditional use required for more), require containers to be in side or rear yards subject to setback rules, and prohibit placement that creates an obstruction to adjoining properties.

Commissioner discussion focused on two points: an apparent contradiction between a clause that limited placement to rear yards and another clause that allowed side‑yard placement, and the need for a discretionary review when placement in a side yard could create sight‑line or site‑obstruction issues. Commissioners agreed to insert explicit language near the start of the section stating that side‑yard containers require Planning and Zoning approval; staff said it would produce a clean, grammatically reviewed copy before forwarding to Council.

A motion to recommend the modifications to PCMC 15.65 was moved and seconded and carried by voice vote. Staff cautioned that if the commission makes significant substantive changes to the redline, another public hearing might be required.

If Council adopts the ordinance, the code will explicitly allow rear‑yard containers under accessory‑building area limits, limit commercial zones to two containers without conditional‑use approval, and make side‑yard placement discretionary with commission review to avoid obstruction to neighboring properties.","After multiple meetings and line‑by‑line review, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended changes to PCMC 15.65 (cargo storage containers), clarifying rear‑yard allowances, side‑yard discretion, and procedural language; staff will prepare a clean, grammar‑checked draft before Council.",{"_33":86,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":87,"_41":88,"_43":89,"_45":90,"_47":91,"_49":92,"_51":93,"_53":94,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":95,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":96,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6317951,"Commission recommends allowing preschools as a permitted use in general commercial zones",1605,413000,2018000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed&start=413&end=2018","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed/thumbnail_413000.jpg","/articles/6317951/Utah/Commission-recommends-allowing-preschools-as-a-permitted-use-in-general-commercial-zones","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6317951-f696bdf709b8a048433d0c4a119d7fd2/orig.mp4?Expires=1775364515&Signature=CWPIN-92cvXou~p98vbD3x~UylaYSUvzukrb-EQoLaG5vtVyWKBnae5ISrOmiaNXYcQBoAwDzY9wsh-YA-JcZBQnjR8njYqW3HqF-WcsjhZxWnMmxT7NrK1PvZ3Vnt5wDiwF5FLXoCxP-VG5F35QzAAFL2cj~B823qocaMcgxXf66rWhyZkDDIy6ID~XL3RDL41v3JAd49qqbkxS-0b1HLREzl5J5cCgsSDliz3wVXRmKQgfcMZXowGWf6hXe2zSUjI3O6WJvi4W7HxIyrm4h2-0pksRvxK~gRzU9d63QZN2EMW9~jHfT7aLc7etBJikXKRD5MHSKORa1B~e7yLmrQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission voted Feb. 19 to recommend amending the city’s use regulations so that schools in general commercial zones explicitly read “pre‑K through 12” rather than “K through 12,” which would make preschools a permitted use.

Commissioners said the change clarifies the code distinction between preschools and day‑care (the latter remains a conditional use in some zones) and would remove a regulatory gap that currently prevents a commercial tenant from opening a preschool without a coding amendment or conditional‑use application.

Dan (city staff) explained options: the commission could broaden the definition of “day care” to include preschool and keep preschool as a conditional use, or change the school listing from K–12 to pre‑K–12 so preschools become permitted. Staff said no specific application had been filed yet for the strip‑mall tenant discussed in public comment; commissioners noted limited available commercial leasable space in town and that a prior conditional‑use daycare application had been filed for a nearby location years ago.

A motion to make a positive recommendation to Council to amend the Parowan City Municipal Code use table (PCMC 15.36.020) to allow preschools in the general commercial zone was moved and seconded and carried by voice vote.

If City Council adopts the amendment, prospective preschool operators in commercial spaces would be able to open under the permitted‑use framework rather than apply for conditional‑use approval. Staff said any specific preschool would still need to comply with building, safety and licensing requirements at the time a business application is submitted.","Parowan commissioners voted to recommend an amendment to the city’s use table to explicitly allow preschools (pre‑K) as a permitted use in the general commercial zone rather than treating them as daycare conditional uses.",{"_33":98,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":99,"_41":100,"_43":101,"_45":102,"_47":103,"_49":104,"_51":105,"_53":106,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":107,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":108,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6317954,"Planning commission recommends rezoning ADash2018Dash000Dash0000 from general commercial to R‑3",1410,326000,1736000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed&start=326&end=1736","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed/thumbnail_326000.jpg","/articles/6317954/Utah/Planning-commission-recommends-rezoning-ADash2018Dash000Dash0000-from-general-commercial-to-R3","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6317954-781fa41245ca1cc4c8747289e9aef56e/orig.mp4?Expires=1775364515&Signature=ROjmEvBcVgqrT-~d31B~iKOACY3doupuetgM867zRjVaSA7tZajp8NFnMvwd7pEExEZd0~jcADZheliP2A8zccXrKVeGFhyF-Vb~15wFCtYBTFRQAhTBbAu8vkDLU5qGarem41REqZxIiz04WDu00mUs18NrRGn45D5YwDwjxs4Rzi6d-y-dG8P~mXkPQNUtMZcyZra5aXwOn4wOMr0PaW9BeGYu3xCiBcPYU8G2Mhi54ECNb3sZ9NrXQbXNCaHvRB2hTBEP859N6Yx6AqgiYn0sLzrph1V-uCgluVPWrwcubSUnx4YR4FJJVtm4WTupJZqD7~zQB~0PC7dL3nHbPw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission on Feb. 19 voted to recommend the rezoning of parcel ADash2018Dash000Dash0000 from general commercial to residential R‑3, a change applicants say is needed to fold the parcel into an existing planned residential development.

The recommendation will go to the Parowan City Council for final action. The commission’s vote followed staff presentation and public comment from a neighboring landowner who objected to the change.

Dan (city staff) said the 10‑acre piece directly north had already been rezoned and was now contiguous with the parcel proposed for rezoning, improving access for development. Dan explained the rezoning was necessary because the developer’s planned unit development (PUD) is residential and “you can't bring in your plan until and if this gets rezoned because your planned unit development is residential and this piece has to be rezoned residential in order to be part of this same project.”

Neighbor Lamont Johnson testified from the public microphone, identifying himself and saying, “I own that 1 piece of property to the east of it and I just totally like to object to the transfer of the from the general commercial.” Dan and Brody Swanson (developer) said there had been confusion about which parcels were rezoned previously; Dan clarified the seven‑acre parcel referenced by Johnson had not been rezoned and remains general commercial.

Commissioners and applicants discussed practical constraints, including existing easements and right‑of‑way access to the triangular parcel Johnson referenced. Brody Swanson said he had reviewed easements and expected road construction to resolve access if the parties reach an agreement. Dan noted these are civil matters between property owners and said, “the zoning, whether it's zone commercial or residential, those easements are in place no matter what it is zoned, and you're going to have to comply with those easements or negotiate to change them or something.”

The commission also discussed land‑use mapping: staff noted the city’s future land‑use map (FLUAM) shows differing uses in the area (medium/high‑density residential and light industrial) and that the zoning map and FLUAM are not wholly consistent. Commissioners weighed whether rezoning would reduce commercial frontage near the interchange but did not identify a formal commercial‑preservation threshold.

A motion to recommend rezoning the parcel from general commercial to residential R‑3 for parcel number ADash2018Dash000Dash0000 was moved and seconded and carried by voice vote.

The commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which holds final authority on the rezoning. If Council approves, the developer will return with PUD and subdivision plans; the developer and adjacent owners will need to resolve easement and access issues as part of later permit and subdivision reviews.","Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend the rezoning of parcel ADash2018Dash000Dash0000 from general commercial to residential R‑3 to enable a planned residential development; staff and nearby property owners discussed access, easements and water requirements.",{"_33":110,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":111,"_41":112,"_43":113,"_45":114,"_47":115,"_49":116,"_51":117,"_53":118,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":119,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":120,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6317936,"Commission agrees to set public hearing on changing 29‑day limit for RV stays at Painted Hills RV Park",2098,2883000,4981000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed&start=2883&end=4981","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2368650-4377471b903def8ff728dd5a249646ed/thumbnail_2883000.jpg","/articles/6317936/Utah/Commission-agrees-to-set-public-hearing-on-changing-29day-limit-for-RV-stays-at-Painted-Hills-RV-Park","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6317936-c097aa94511df0eeb3741c83a65eec9e/orig.mp4?Expires=1775364515&Signature=bLDnL0aDo1qg7ge9h4x8LZlLT~LwjigTXclVXc-x14yqhFtIhDdLX~OROBy1mRGATMFss2E~6Vb0THY83~Jgsf7SioRR4u-iE7Hw8SW-eokNenttJzwHo1FH63epD~ZKDaYdonUlsNsWUbcu3NTpk~Her3Y1YgVaqP1DtC4XMKeDSHaURMYOu2rq~x6Gv0DjNODzkJc4K1Bq6RIe4FYmuttSrbKYoKByyfKUC4oDtMRixlLQCNsOldPgQA1pujgNRUza1jtZiYJYZdt0s9KI4e6Agu2kwoobgLIYp8P7VjA~t9busxOcoRS9RYzKqLowc0uHwAx64qKitIUbt6S2JQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Owners of Painted Hills RV Park asked the Parowan Planning and Zoning Commission on Feb. 19 to reconsider a 29‑day limit on stays that is embedded in the city’s RV‑park code. The commission agreed to place a text amendment on a future public hearing to let the public weigh options that range from leaving the restriction in place to extending it (120–180 days) or removing it.

Casey Jones, co‑owner and principal of Painted Hills RV Park, told the commission the park was operating under the current conditional‑use framework and had made significant capital improvements since annexation in 2022. He said management enforces a no‑permanent‑structure policy, inspects older RVs before admitting them, and has recorded few police incidents since opening. Jones told commissioners, “My preference would be to eliminate the restriction and allow us to manage the business in a successful way.”

City staff explained how the 29‑day rule was implemented in the RV‑park chapter by defining “transient” as 29 days or less and suggested the cleanest mechanism for change would be a text amendment to the definition of “transient” in the code. Commissioners discussed intermediate options (for example, 120 days or six months) and enforcement mechanisms to prevent conversion into permanent housing. Dan (city staff) explained the code still prohibits permanent affixation or conversion of RVs into permanent housing and emphasized that conditional‑use status provides a mechanism to revoke approval if standards are not met.

Casey said many long‑stay guests are seasonal workers or people building homes nearby; he estimated that long‑stay customers would remain a minority and that the park’s business model favors short‑term stays. He added management typically inspects RVs and enforces an appearance/condition standard. On the taxation question, staff and the owner explained that transient room tax (TRT) is collected for stays of 29 days or less; the park’s reservation software identifies returning guests and automatically stops collecting TRT when a customer reaches the code’s 29‑day threshold, and the park refunds the tax as required.

Commissioners agreed there was enough interest to proceed to a formal public hearing; one commissioner suggested starting with a 120‑day proposal and seeing public comment. The commission then voted to place the text amendment for the RV‑park transient definition (PCMC Title 15‑56) on a public hearing calendar; no ordinance was adopted at this meeting.","Owners of Painted Hills RV Park requested removal or extension of the city’s 29‑day limit on RV stays; commissioners agreed to schedule a public hearing to consider a text amendment to Parowan City Municipal Code Title 15‑56, with options ranging from keeping the limit to extending it (e.g., 120 days, six months) or removing it.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission recommends code changes to replace Board of Adjustments with single appeal authority

Commission forwards relaxed cargo‑container rules with edits; staff will clean grammar before Council

Commission recommends allowing preschools as a permitted use in general commercial zones

Planning commission recommends rezoning ADash2018Dash000Dash0000 from general commercial to R‑3

Commission agrees to set public hearing on changing 29‑day limit for RV stays at Painted Hills RV Park