New intermediate license requirements set for young drivers in Washington

A new legislative proposal, Senate Bill 5717, aims to tighten the requirements for obtaining an intermediate driver's license in Washington State, targeting the safety of young drivers. Introduced on February 24, 2025, the bill seeks to enhance the existing framework by imposing stricter regulations on applicants aged 16 and older.

The bill outlines several key provisions that applicants must meet to qualify for an intermediate license. These include holding a valid instruction permit for at least six months, passing a driver licensing examination, completing a driver's education course, and fulfilling a new requirement for driver work zone and first responder safety training. Additionally, applicants must provide certification of at least 50 hours of supervised driving experience, including 10 hours at night, and must not have any pending traffic violations or recent convictions.

One of the most significant changes proposed is the restriction on passengers. For the first six months of holding an intermediate license, drivers will be prohibited from carrying passengers under 20 years old who are not immediate family members. After this period, they may carry no more than three such passengers. Furthermore, the bill restricts driving between 1 a.m. and 5 a.m., unless accompanied by a licensed driver aged 25 or older or for specific activities like school or work.

The bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers and safety advocates, with supporters arguing that these measures will reduce accidents among young drivers, who are statistically more prone to risky behavior. Critics, however, express concerns about the potential for overregulation and the impact on young people's mobility and independence.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its implications could reshape the landscape of teen driving in Washington. If passed, it may lead to a decrease in traffic incidents involving young drivers, but it could also ignite debates about balancing safety with personal freedom. The next steps will involve committee reviews and potential amendments, as stakeholders weigh the benefits of enhanced safety against the challenges of enforcement and compliance.