The Franklin County Fiscal Court held a work session on November 6, 2024, focusing on public comments and zoning issues, particularly regarding a contentious planning and zoning matter. The county attorney, Max Thomas, emphasized that public comments should be restricted to topics unrelated to the ongoing zoning issue to comply with a previous ruling from the Franklin Circuit Court. This ruling stated that only information presented during an evidentiary hearing could be considered in the court's decision-making process.

The discussion revealed a divide among court members regarding the handling of public comments. Some members expressed concern about limiting public input, arguing that it could infringe on citizens' rights to voice their opinions. They suggested seeking an opinion from the Attorney General to clarify the legal boundaries of public comments in this context. Others cautioned against allowing comments that could be construed as evidence, which might jeopardize the integrity of the ongoing zoning process.

During the public comment segment, several residents voiced their opposition to the proposed industrial park on the county line, citing a lack of public support and urging the court to respect the comprehensive planning process. They argued that moving forward with resolutions related to the industrial park undermined public trust and disregarded community input.

In addition to zoning discussions, the meeting included updates from the road department, highlighting ongoing leaf collection efforts and preparations for winter weather. The court also discussed a lease renewal for the Buffalo Trace compost facility, which was presented without changes, and plans for a potential educational segment featuring the community on PBS.

The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between regulatory compliance and community engagement, with court members grappling with how to balance legal obligations with the public's right to participate in local governance. The court is expected to continue addressing these issues in future meetings, particularly as they relate to the contentious zoning matters.