[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6664414,"mediaKeyId","2381707-174469a5ea8d2e207c68a4524a83c7e1","parentId",2381707,"title","Board approves travel request for Sabin Schellenberg building-construction program","audioSeconds",61,"startMs",4520375,"endMs",4582060,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2381707-174469a5ea8d2e207c68a4524a83c7e1&start=4520&end=4582","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2381707-174469a5ea8d2e207c68a4524a83c7e1/thumbnail_4520375.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6664414/Oregon/Board-approves-travel-request-for-Sabin-Schellenberg-building-construction-program","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6664414-6f8396922510885ee346aab1467e0409/orig.mp4?Expires=1773585964&Signature=H8qZKndGdguFK9dICQMrAMNYGieoXHtRgGtJTxpKfR7RBt04gE8jkgGm5-~kkgr~3AuqzRhVXa8ZmptefXziucIiuAk~zBpvKeIOxRmrsswTbDrUOqCIZFjIWGwU4YS9VL72UdtQBnV-1RbBfRuKOcVX5wbQCvYxw9zPb6P-D0i6VaW2WgvL~beQSinFKfPAhAHSvMsKO5lr3-H13q1SXlF~VPpJQur29Eu1upPpsdWk3K3YGcrphapHV-5vQmbu7lK-yYo9vA8hclfBZ2BvmT5VaUWTnL~Xo9Jyyg3hAK6tVp1BhyKgvjlQdRRZKgS860FxlpXL4mF~SjcRLssp5g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","North Clackamas School District 12","date","2025-02-22T22:22:08.357Z","article","On Feb. 22 the North Clackamas School District Board of Directors approved a consent-agenda travel request for the Sabin Schellenberg Professional Technical Center building-construction program.

Vice Chair Beneloga moved approval of the consent agenda item; Director McVey seconded. Chair Wey called the vote; the board approved the motion on a recorded tally of 6–0. No discussion or abstentions were recorded in the meeting transcript.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","NCSD Board Meeting February 22, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The North Clackamas School District board approved a travel request for the Sabin Schellenberg Professional Technical Center building construction program on a unanimous 6-0 vote during the Feb. 22 public meeting consent agenda.","taxTitle","North Clackamas SD 12, School Districts, Oregon","taxId",14579,"location","Oregon","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6664418,"North Clackamas SD 12 outlines maintenance-focused bond plan and seeks board authorization to consider refinancing",2361,1102040,3463190,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2381707-174469a5ea8d2e207c68a4524a83c7e1&start=1102&end=3463","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2381707-174469a5ea8d2e207c68a4524a83c7e1/thumbnail_1102040.jpg","/articles/6664418/Oregon/North-Clackamas-SD-12-outlines-maintenance-focused-bond-plan-and-seeks-board-authorization-to-consider-refinancing","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6664418-19f9d1b7248100f09373420931cc2093/orig.mp4?Expires=1773585964&Signature=csHVZ9SZ7-uzwI3Kovqtaw-QOE9e~ucqxU28QsNwpRUQwwr1TBqChAK689E5kQL8mLvZxiN6ev9nJSiV7VBVIkjBLaTn8a50dNAFku8KNJTUERe28zTJ6gcbCBAI42piqWtZMwCH~6Q4-0mbMOjkPO4zR2lYFnDfm-gDY1SAXoUle67exF4-gSNot4-MA9D1zl5rjU8BGbwzEmJ~wm9E0qI-zWF-Znqifdke6wREKu-hB2m6u-VjcaX6a2ZwT~MdatA-PFc1nQ2-PWHvYj6HLOjFA0RCN8062isT-imLLipyMT~huddpqRhWWX6OIpPMoNTJ0wFxakD6qgxb1aqAkw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At a Feb. 22 work session, North Clackamas School District staff laid out a maintenance-first bond strategy and asked the board to authorize consideration of a refinancing that could preserve the current bond tax rate and increase the district’s borrowing capacity for a future bond.

Staff described five priority categories for a maintenance stewardship bond: safety and security improvements (including upgraded communications and cameras), roof replacements, ventilation and thermal comfort upgrades (staff said chiller/split systems could be used where full HVAC is not feasible; staff estimated ventilation work could affect about 78% of district schools), technology-infrastructure upgrades (cybersecurity, storage and project-based backbone upgrades to support cameras, sensors and cooling systems), and an “automation” category covering boilers, windows and building-envelope repairs. The district’s long-term facility plan (completed April 2023) and a facilities condition assessment (FCA) informed the priorities; staff said they have integrated FCA data into the Incident IQ work-order system to maintain a live inventory of needs.

Staff presented high-level cost estimates: if the district went to bond in 2026 the five categories’ critical and Priority 1 work was estimated at roughly $356,000,000; waiting until 2028 was estimated to increase the total by about $52,300,000 to roughly $408,000,000 because of escalation and additional discovered repairs. Staff said some previously prioritized work could become critical if delayed, further increasing costs.

On financing, Matt, the district’s executive director of finance and business services, outlined a refinancing strategy intended to preserve the district’s current bond tax rate. He said the district’s current tax rate is about $2.37 per $1,000 of assessed value and is scheduled to drop to about $2.00 on July 1 without action. A targeted refinancing could “bridge” future debt and allow the district to ask voters to renew the existing rate rather than request a tax increase. Matt said refinancing can generate additional capacity: his slides showed a 2026 bond with refinancing producing roughly $219 million in capacity compared with about $198 million without refinancing; a 2028 bond with refinancing showed roughly $302.6 million versus about $261 million without refinancing.

Staff stressed market uncertainty and timing. The board was told a resolution to authorize pursuit of refinancing would appear on the board agenda for Feb. 27; that authorization would permit staff to pursue refinancing if market conditions turn favorable but would not, by itself, commit the district to issue debt. Staff said a go/no-go decision would be made by mid-April based on market conditions; if the district proceeded, final details (scope, duration and amounts) would be finalized in the following weeks with implementation reflected in the district budget for the 2026 fiscal year (beginning July 1).

Board members asked about escalation assumptions, the life cycle of prior investments and how the district will prioritize among the five categories if limited funds are available. Staff said the near-term priorities would be safety/security, roofs and ventilation, and that district staff intend to prioritize critical failures within those categories if resources are constrained. Staff also noted plans for community engagement, including a facilities-focused community conversation on March 19 and establishment of an advisory committee in the coming fall.

No formal financing action was taken at the Feb. 22 work session; staff requested authorization to present a refinancing resolution for board consideration on Feb. 27 and to continue market monitoring and outreach.","District staff proposed shifting to a maintenance- and stewardship-focused bond, estimated at about $356 million for a 2026 bond or $408 million for 2028, and asked the board to authorize staff to pursue possible refinancing to preserve the current bond tax rate and increase borrowing capacity.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6664422,"North Clackamas SD 12 projects relatively flat district enrollment but major growth in Nelson feeder raises capacity concerns",970,123770,1094512,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2381707-174469a5ea8d2e207c68a4524a83c7e1&start=123&end=1094","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2381707-174469a5ea8d2e207c68a4524a83c7e1/thumbnail_123770.jpg","/articles/6664422/Oregon/North-Clackamas-SD-12-projects-relatively-flat-district-enrollment-but-major-growth-in-Nelson-feeder-raises-capacity-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6664422-4865dc94065934ff268b29149077813d/orig.mp4?Expires=1773585965&Signature=ntxs3gCAGJjTtqMBCQkgUuDzCvwGu7FoqoEqsMdCIgFDxh8jTGDGELzqHp5H0-V6VVHApD6pdvq0avRj2TB6VqGPRQybgVoSiDRz6J6sDfIxYB7~I5FwJsbupVA7lEiYn2PgOzguwQJrTo4ERBjmbnk5uxHBqPaApaZLNoHoa2m7XjSYzjISsOlCEhRpVmnVtghzSG1FtgTInXG6tRWVgSSmxrRUCMo2hx4f2Hk7qrHRIR~Wm5u-pj1qq8cSule-TMIjN0hc-CDKfJ9X65pyqtNviYYaZaM1c5W3mcx~uMNW-78y6XnSPYyU6GjU8ddzcq-OOhpnpaqzBK4klSG59g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At a Feb. 22 work session, North Clackamas School District staff reported that districtwide enrollment is projected to remain relatively flat over the next nine to ten years, while the Nelson feeder pattern is forecast to gain more than 500 students, creating capacity pressures at middle- and high-school levels.

The district’s demographer, Flow Analytics, provided a 10-year outlook the district updates annually. Staff said the capacity analysis uses standard assumptions — 25 students per elementary classroom and 28 students per middle and high school classroom — and a simple formula based on an assumed number of classrooms per building. Cindy (project administrator) explained this yields a maximum-capacity estimate that does not capture non-classroom uses such as cafeterias, gyms, parking or specialized program space.

The enrollment projections staff presented showed varied trends by feeder: the Clackamas feeder is projected to decline by about 282 students; the Milwaukee feeder is expected to grow slightly by a little over 100 students; Rex Putnam’s feeder shows a net loss of about 40 students; and the Nelson feeder shows the largest projected increase (more than 500 students over nine years). Staff said charter programs co-located in district buildings were handled differently in the analysis: Milwaukee Academy of the Arts and Sojourner, which are co-located, were counted as part of the facility totals; New Urban, identified as a magnet, was not treated as affecting boundary enrollments.

Board members asked about the timeline and options to respond to localized overcrowding. Staff said temporary modular (portable) classrooms have been used in past years (for example at Community and Scouters) but are not permanent solutions and require permitting; they described boundary changes as a more complex community process. One staff member said a boundary process tied to opening a new building in a prior bond cycle took roughly six to ten months of active community work, with about 18 to 24 months typically required if the change is unexpected and no new building is available.

Staff also discussed a recent school-by-school space review done by site visits and principal interviews; they said they updated capacity spreadsheets to exclude spaces such as music and physical-education rooms from classroom counts and to include “regulation” or temporary student-support rooms as classroom-equivalent when appropriate. Staff noted that the capacity calculations assume full enrollment with no absenteeism and that program changes or expanded special-education supports could change space needs over time.

Board members raised alternatives such as programmatic changes (examples cited elsewhere in the district include magnet or specialty programs) that could influence enrollment patterns, and emphasized the need to complete the space-efficiency analysis before making boundary recommendations. Staff said they will continue annual enrollment monitoring, complete additional space-use reports for principals and bring options back to the board as analysis continues.

The discussion concluded with staff noting there is not an immediate districtwide capacity crisis but that certain schools—particularly in the Nelson feeder—could require closer attention within the next two years if current trends persist.","At a Feb. 22 board work session staff said districtwide enrollment is expected to remain largely flat over the next decade, but the Nelson feeder pattern could add more than 500 students in nine years, prompting discussion of portables, boundary changes and further analysis.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board approves travel request for Sabin Schellenberg building-construction program

North Clackamas SD 12 outlines maintenance-focused bond plan and seeks board authorization to consider refinancing

North Clackamas SD 12 projects relatively flat district enrollment but major growth in Nelson feeder raises capacity concerns