Hooper City Council faces backlash over citizen comment removal and mayor's actions

Hooper City Council is facing mounting pressure from residents regarding transparency and citizen engagement following a heated meeting on February 20, 2025. The council discussed potential changes to local road ordinances and the implications of annexing private roads, but the most significant discussions revolved around the removal of citizen comments from the meeting agenda.

During the meeting, several residents voiced their concerns about the current structure of public comments, which have been relegated to the end of the agenda. Jake Kelso, a local resident, criticized the council for this change, arguing that it undermines transparency and citizen participation. He called for the restoration of citizen comments to the beginning of the agenda, emphasizing the need for open dialogue before decisions are made.

Amber Kelso, another resident, passionately defended a planning commission member, Amanda Prince, who has faced scrutiny and alleged harassment. She accused the mayor of using her position to silence dissenting voices and manipulate council proceedings for personal agendas. This sentiment was echoed by other residents who expressed fears about the safety and integrity of public discourse in Hooper.

The mayor responded by reiterating the council's commitment to transparency and encouraged residents to reach out directly to council members with their concerns. However, the ongoing tensions suggest a growing divide between the council and the community, with residents demanding more accountability and a return to open discussions.

As the council navigates these challenges, the implications for local governance and community trust remain significant. The council's next steps will be crucial in addressing these concerns and fostering a more inclusive environment for citizen engagement.