West Virginia Legislature mandates preservation of electronic voting data
February 25, 2025 | Introduced Bills, Senate Bills, 2025 Bills, West Virginia Legislation Bills, West Virginia
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
On February 25, 2025, the West Virginia State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 593, aimed at enhancing the preservation of voting data from electronic voting machines. This bill seeks to amend the Code of West Virginia by adding a new section, §3-4A-27a, specifically addressing the protocols for counties utilizing the Express Vote system.
The primary purpose of Senate Bill 593 is to ensure that all voting data is systematically collected and preserved. Key provisions of the bill mandate that counties must enable the ballot tabulator functionality to capture ballot images. Importantly, the bill stipulates that both ballot images and cast vote records must not contain any personally identifiable information about voters, thereby safeguarding voter privacy.
Additionally, the bill requires that cast vote records include a date stamp indicating when votes were cast. County election officials are tasked with electronically submitting these records and images to the Secretary of State immediately following the election canvass. Within 24 hours of receipt, the Secretary of State is obligated to publish this data on a publicly accessible website, organized by precinct and county.
The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers regarding the implications of increased transparency in the electoral process. Proponents argue that it will bolster public confidence in election integrity by making voting data readily available for scrutiny. However, some legislators have raised concerns about the potential for misuse of the published data, despite the safeguards against personal identification.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its significance lies in its potential to reshape how voting data is managed and perceived in West Virginia. If enacted, it could set a precedent for other states considering similar measures to enhance electoral transparency and accountability. The ongoing debates surrounding the bill will likely influence its final form and implementation, as stakeholders weigh the balance between transparency and privacy in the electoral system.
The primary purpose of Senate Bill 593 is to ensure that all voting data is systematically collected and preserved. Key provisions of the bill mandate that counties must enable the ballot tabulator functionality to capture ballot images. Importantly, the bill stipulates that both ballot images and cast vote records must not contain any personally identifiable information about voters, thereby safeguarding voter privacy.
Additionally, the bill requires that cast vote records include a date stamp indicating when votes were cast. County election officials are tasked with electronically submitting these records and images to the Secretary of State immediately following the election canvass. Within 24 hours of receipt, the Secretary of State is obligated to publish this data on a publicly accessible website, organized by precinct and county.
The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers regarding the implications of increased transparency in the electoral process. Proponents argue that it will bolster public confidence in election integrity by making voting data readily available for scrutiny. However, some legislators have raised concerns about the potential for misuse of the published data, despite the safeguards against personal identification.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its significance lies in its potential to reshape how voting data is managed and perceived in West Virginia. If enacted, it could set a precedent for other states considering similar measures to enhance electoral transparency and accountability. The ongoing debates surrounding the bill will likely influence its final form and implementation, as stakeholders weigh the balance between transparency and privacy in the electoral system.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill