Cochise County officials engaged in a heated discussion during a special executive session on February 25, 2025, focusing on the role and responsibilities of the county administrator position. The meeting highlighted concerns about the current organizational structure and the effectiveness of the county administrator in managing day-to-day operations.
A significant point of contention was the so-called "bubble chart," which some supervisors deemed ineffective and in need of revision. The board members expressed a desire for clarity in the job description of the county administrator, emphasizing the need for a position that aligns with the board's authority and accountability. One supervisor articulated the importance of ensuring that the board maintains oversight, stating, "the board of supervisors is the boss," and underscoring the potential risks of an administrator who may not act in accordance with the board's directives.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The discussion also touched on the constitutional implications of delegating executive responsibilities to an unelected official. Some supervisors voiced concerns that this arrangement could undermine the board's authority and lead to a lack of accountability. One member argued that the current structure could allow the administrator to "stonewall" the board, preventing them from accessing crucial information necessary for decision-making.
As the meeting progressed, the supervisors debated the need for a county administrator at all, with some advocating for a more direct reporting structure that would allow staff to communicate directly with board members. This proposal aimed to enhance transparency and ensure that elected officials remain closely involved in the governance of the county.
The session concluded without a definitive resolution, but it set the stage for further discussions on how to restructure the county administrator role to better serve the community's needs. The board's ongoing deliberations reflect a commitment to refining governance practices and ensuring that elected officials retain control over county operations, ultimately aiming to enhance accountability and responsiveness to residents.