City demands $1000 fine for illegal short term rental advertising in Daytona Beach

In the heart of Daytona Beach, a pressing issue unfolded during a recent city meeting, where officials addressed the growing concern over unregulated short-term rentals. The discussion centered around a specific property that had been found in violation of city zoning laws, with the violation first noted on January 31, 2025. The property owner was promptly notified, and by February 4, the property ceased advertising its rental services.

Melissa Diaz, an assistant city attorney, presented the city’s case, emphasizing the irreversible nature of the violation. The property had been marketed at a daily rate of $150, attracting guests to the area for major events like the Daytona 500 and Biketoberfest. Diaz highlighted the challenges posed by such advertisements, noting that once information is shared online, it can be disseminated widely, making it nearly impossible to retract.

The city is seeking a one-time fine of $1,000 against the property owner, arguing that the unregulated rentals pose significant risks to patrons, including poor health and safety conditions. Diaz pointed out that these unlawful rentals undermine the licensed hotels and vacation rentals that comply with local regulations, inspections, and taxes. The disparity creates an unfair competitive landscape, harming both the community and legitimate businesses.

The meeting also revealed broader implications of unregulated rentals, including tax avoidance and inadequate insurance coverage. The transient nature of these rentals complicates enforcement efforts, as patrons often leave before code enforcement can address the violations. Diaz stressed the need for stronger deterrents against such practices, reflecting a growing demand from the business community for stricter regulations.

As Daytona Beach continues to navigate the complexities of short-term rentals, the city remains committed to protecting its residents and businesses from the potential harms of unregulated accommodations. The outcome of this case may set a precedent for how the city handles similar violations in the future, ensuring that the integrity of its neighborhoods and the safety of its visitors are upheld.