The Pacifica City Council meeting on February 24, 2025, was dominated by passionate discussions surrounding the regulation of short-term rentals (STRs) in the community. Residents expressed deep concerns about the impact of unhosted STRs on neighborhood safety, housing availability, and the overall character of Pacifica.

Bob O'Donnell, a long-time resident, highlighted the negative consequences of unregulated STRs, citing issues such as noise, parking congestion, and a decline in local school enrollment due to families being priced out of the housing market. He urged the council to limit unhosted STRs to 60 days per year, down from the proposed 90 days, arguing that the current allowance effectively turns homes into hotels, undermining the residential nature of neighborhoods.

Several speakers echoed O'Donnell's sentiments, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations to protect community integrity. Lila Ranaro shared her family's struggles with disruptive guests and the fear of safety that comes with constant turnover in nearby STRs. She called for a complete ban on unhosted rentals, advocating for a return to a community where families can thrive.

Conversely, some STR operators defended their practices, arguing that responsible hosting contributes positively to the local economy and tourism. They expressed concern that overly restrictive regulations could harm legitimate operators while failing to address the few problematic properties. Operators like Albert Zhang emphasized the economic benefits of STRs, which generate significant tax revenue for the city.

The council also faced calls for platform accountability, with residents urging that online rental platforms be held responsible for ensuring compliance with local regulations. Many speakers suggested that the city should implement inspections and enforce stricter penalties for non-compliance to ensure that the majority of responsible operators are not unfairly penalized.

As the council deliberates on the proposed STR ordinance, the community remains divided. The outcome of these discussions could significantly shape the future of housing and neighborhood dynamics in Pacifica, as residents seek to balance the benefits of tourism with the need for a safe and stable community environment.