[{"_1":2,"_86":-5,"_87":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},"mediaId",6311358,"mediaKeyId","2396230-442e23938f87cbea42509618ed872a4e","parentId",2396230,"title","Planning commission actions: denials, approvals and deferrals on multiple rezoning requests","audioSeconds",4427,"startMs",4323000,"endMs",8750000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2396230-442e23938f87cbea42509618ed872a4e&start=4323&end=8750","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2396230-442e23938f87cbea42509618ed872a4e/thumbnail_4323000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6311358/Berkeley-County/South-Carolina/Planning-commission-actions-denials-approvals-and-deferrals-on-multiple-rezoning-requests","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6311358-b8de8137deb281d4c87bf62034aed116/orig.mp4?Expires=1770868021&Signature=VGKeM7Po8fkpyXZZ-Y3LtFE3Psgds2DyDD-l-of9fUlgUotKou1mExHI6yWfG-mjPPTZZ4jm9ReknHCjF3Yvc4-ofp1DfP~GH3AwcY9KimDuuXffZKvxKBacp2m38d15OIogqsJGJURaW7yqDf6nACMVz3FLbHB10dSOvJReHrhFfgNdwoqzEE31uNh-1RqeLY~CYNEla2y9wUo2up9WdQJ-0XWPgfz14fYZAzMZCXbYRYYEovHHoxTkYPhn040aMi9y~oX0WR9uEQcfoDWt-oDERgbfMmS7NiDN22fDsTVO3jZElg26pGpV0zA92gEqnRjUlQLvL7TO9VBkezzTcg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-02-25T22:57:34Z","article","The Berkeley County Planning Commission considered a slate of rezoning and map amendment requests and issued recommendations to county council. Below are the key outcomes from the meeting (listed as Planning Commission recommendation; county council has final authority):

Votes at a glance

- Tobias Jordan (portion of TMS 210000012, approx. 7 acres): Deferred. Staff said written concurrence from all heirs and a traffic impact analysis (TIA) were outstanding; the applicant asked for additional time and the commission voted to defer the item to allow the applicant to provide required documentation.

- Jaren (Darren) Adam Quick (TMS 140-2-12-2402, ~1.88 acres, Lion Lane): Denied (planning staff recommended denial). The applicant proposed an RV/recreation vehicle storage facility; staff found the parcel inconsistent with the comprehensive plan growth corridor and suburban communities designations and warned of potential spot‑zoning concerns. The commission voted to recommend rejection.

- Matt Bullwinkle / Crazy Aid LLC (TMS 196-00-00-008, ~9.39 acres, South Live Oak Drive / Pine Crest Drive): Approved. Applicant proposed a gas station and vehicle‑service use at the Highway 17 / Pine Crest Drive location. Staff found the request conformed with mixed‑use center and growth corridor designations and recommended approval; the commission voted to recommend approval.

- Sydney Fowler (TMS 196-09-01-057, ~2.2 acres, Summer Lane): Approved. Applicant sought R2RF (mobile home/park residential) to permit construction of a garage accessory use that exceeded the R2 allowance; staff recommended approval to align with neighborhood mixed‑use designation.

- Edwin Bitter / 110 Edgebrook LLC (TMS portion ~0.66 acre of 15.9 acres, Edgebrook Drive): Approved. Request to change a mobile home park R3 parcel to R2 to formalize two existing single‑family lots; staff recommended approval as consistent with neighborhood mixed‑use.

- Jean Jenny Keller and James & Margie Ard (TMS 225-00-00-025 & -026, ~1.98 and ~1.75 acres, Spotted Isle Lane): Approved. Both properties requested PMU '1 to R1R (rural single‑family) and staff recommended approval; the commission recommended approval.

- PR Home Enterprises / Pedro Rodriguez (TMS 233-02-04-031, ~2.4 acres, Royal Road / East Side Street): Deferred. Applicant requested R2 to R3 to reestablish a mobile home park unit; staff recommended approval contingent on demonstrating public sewer availability. The applicant requested a deferral to secure sewer‑extension confirmation; the commission granted deferral.

- Philip Obi II (TMS 234-12-xxxx, Goose Creek): Approved. Applicant requested downzoning from R2 to Flex 1 to allow a second dwelling unit on a parcel with roughly 3.56 acres; staff found the change consistent with the rural living future land‑use designation and the commission recommended approval.

What staff and applicants said

Planning staff (Miss Simmons and colleagues) presented each item with a summary of the property, adjacent uses, conformity with the comprehensive plan and any technical conditions (for example, TIAs, stormwater and sewer capacity). For the items deferred the department noted missing pieces: written concurrence from heirs in the Tobias Jordan case and a traffic impact study; and sewer‑extension confirmation for the PR Home Enterprises mobile‑home request.

Applicants explained intended uses: Elijah Richardson (on behalf of Tobias Jordan) said he was the lessee coordinating with heirs; Darren Adam Quick said the RV storage would serve nearby lakes/rivers and resort users but that he preferred not to pursue GC uses that would allow other commercial uses; Matt Bullwinkle described a gas‑station site plan at Highway 17 and Pine Crest; Saul Hernandez appeared for Pedro Rodriguez about restoring an existing mobile‑home unit.

Commissioners and members of the public raised procedural, traffic, environmental and compatibility questions across items: ownership/consent from heirs (Tobias Jordan), stormwater and paint‑blasting waste and diesel truck staging (truck stop and sandblasting concept), potential spot‑zoning and traffic congestion (RV storage), and sewer availability for mobile‑home park expansions (PR Home Enterprises). Where appropriate staff identified existing county reviews (stormwater, BCWS/BCWSD processes) that would apply during plan review.

Next steps

All actions are recommendations to county council. For deferred items, applicants were instructed to bring the requested documentation (heirs' written concurrence, TIAs, sewer‑extension plans) when the item returns to the commission or proceeds to county council. Planning staff noted the next land use committee meeting date and asked applicants and interested members of the public to follow their cases through council.

Detailed action records for each item are included in the package transmitted to county council; applicants and interested parties may contact the Berkeley County Planning Department for the full staff report and schedules.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Berkeley County Planning and Zoning Meeting 02/25/25","oneSentenceSummary","The Berkeley County Planning Commission issued a series of recommendations on rezoning requests ranging from denials to approvals and several deferrals; county council will make final decisions.","taxTitle","Berkeley County, South Carolina","taxId",19112,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":56,"_73":56},6311363,"Planning commission recommends denial of zoning text amendment to allow private shooting ranges across much of Berkeley County",3805,491000,4296000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2396230-442e23938f87cbea42509618ed872a4e&start=491&end=4296","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2396230-442e23938f87cbea42509618ed872a4e/thumbnail_491000.jpg","/articles/6311363/Berkeley-County/South-Carolina/Planning-commission-recommends-denial-of-zoning-text-amendment-to-allow-private-shooting-ranges-across-much-of-Berkeley-County","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6311363-aee1209f57c56cc42e2d7a92681a3b9d/orig.mp4?Expires=1770868021&Signature=UtJ5Z8NXIxPlDwj0JwdO~C7-By85MqvXJj0FDRxacI5Q03S3I9JQQq08XE2VKxp-1SBKoRzIDOMiJJxmrFgkk9etBwq-OiAIEzUjXONu3wXsWOO1s6icKVashKSDWpLU0YzP5-pPI3PM3xJzz87psfwtNhjD45InSwaNLGVzklHgtBwwLie2Fyzn4aspufxwq389gDyAGoPFKIMPOOJVlBK~DCDInut1tWn6ySmx3n10GPa-7kCY07cqZAPB68jz7KaqPfF7uwUouiSxKNLiLA1EdfMSWNKClk28EiCGTcBBQfN6os8RLeNxCpeifbZ-h3Dxo9IHfRQJB8fAi8n-6Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Berkeley County Planning Commission on a motion recommended denial of a proposed amendment to §6.4.7 of the county Zoning and Development Standards Ordinance that would create a special‑exception use allowing private firearms and archery ranges in the Agricultural Flex 1 (Flex 1) district. The applicant, Mr. David Clark, president and operator of Cloverfields Sportsman's Club (Clover Fields Bridal Shooting Range), is pursuing the amendment after code enforcement opened a violation for an outdoor firing range on a roughly 6‑acre parcel off Clover Lane.

Commission staff told the panel the proposed change would be generally applicable to any parcel zoned Flex 1 and therefore must be written with clear, enforceable performance standards. Staff said the request “does not conform to the comprehensive plan at this time,” noting many Flex 1 parcels fall in the plan’s rural living designation and that proposed performance standards were not adequate to ensure compatibility with rural residential uses. Staff recommended denial. Staff also pointed commissioners to the existing ordinance text that limits outdoor “shooting range, outdoor” uses to the heavy industrial district and to the county’s process for special exceptions through the Board of Zoning Appeals.

Mr. Clark and other club members told commissioners the range has operated for more than a decade, that members have constructed berms and other sound‑mitigation measures, and that the club maintains liability insurance and range safety procedures. \"We've been there for more than 10 years,\" Clark said during his presentation. He described berm heights and sound‑mitigation work and said membership is capped because of insurance limits.

Opposition from nearby residents was strong and vocal. Several neighbors described persistent noise, proximity to houses and porches, and the quality‑of‑life impact of frequent shooting. \"It's extremely noisy and really affects our way of life,\" said Brian Hannah, who said his property touches the club parcel and offered video recordings into the record. Other neighbors raised safety, liability and buffering concerns and cited a recent USDA tree‑clearing grant on adjacent acreage that they said would reduce natural buffers.

Supporters said the privately run club provides training and family programs and that members have invested in berms and other improvements. \"This is an issue of three things: property owner rights for the folks that live out there, Second Amendment rights and Native American rights,\" said Robert Hayes, treasurer of the Cloverfields club and a former law‑enforcement officer, during public comment.

Commission discussion focused on two central points: whether the proposed use could be written with enforceable performance standards appropriate to the county’s rural living designation, and the scope of impact if Flex 1 were amended (staff noted Flex 1 makes up roughly 80 percent of unincorporated Berkeley County). Commissioners also cited evidence from code enforcement that a notice of violation had been filed and that the department had received written public comment from adjacent landowners.

A motion to approve the text amendment died for lack of a second. A subsequent motion to deny the application was made and seconded; the motion carried, and the commission’s recommendation is denial. The decision is a recommendation only; county council has the final legislative authority. Planning staff said the item will proceed to the land use committee and county council; the next land use committee meeting was announced for March 10.

The applicant may pursue the change through county council if desired. If an ordinance is adopted, the Planning Department reminded the commission and the public that any property owner with Flex 1 zoning would still have to apply for and secure a special exception from the Board of Zoning Appeals before operating a range.","The Berkeley County Planning Commission on a motion recommended denial of a proposed amendment to the county zoning ordinance that would allow private firearms and archery ranges as a special‑exception use in the Agricultural Flex 1 district.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning commission actions: denials, approvals and deferrals on multiple rezoning requests

Planning commission recommends denial of zoning text amendment to allow private shooting ranges across much of Berkeley County