Concerns over proposed zoning changes dominated the Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors meeting on May 28, 2024, as local builders voiced strong opposition to new regulations that could significantly impact their ability to develop homes. The Planning Commission had recommended denying two key proposals, which would alter the current zoning ordinance that allows for exempt subdivisions—an essential avenue for small builders to operate.

Mark Sims, president of the Fredericksburg Area Builders Association, highlighted the potential detrimental effects of the proposed changes on local builders, many of whom construct only a handful of homes each year. He argued that the current zoning framework enables builders to purchase single lots and develop them, providing crucial income for property owners and affordable housing options for residents. Sims emphasized that the proposed code changes could increase construction costs by 35% to 40%, making it nearly impossible for small builders to compete.

Sims also pointed out that the existing regulations were designed to support local builders and property owners, allowing them to generate income through lot sales. He warned that the proposed changes would push these builders out of the market, complicating the already challenging landscape of home construction in the county. He urged the board to consider the broader implications of their decisions, particularly in light of the rising housing prices in Spotsylvania, where the median home price recently reached $450,000.

During the meeting, board members expressed their own uncertainties regarding the proposed changes, particularly concerning stormwater management issues that have arisen from past developments. Some members suggested that more time was needed to fully understand the implications of the proposed code changes before moving forward.

As the public hearing concluded, the board faced a critical decision on whether to adopt the proposed changes, with many local builders and residents anxiously awaiting the outcome. The discussions underscored the ongoing tension between regulatory measures aimed at managing growth and the need to support local builders in providing affordable housing options.