Shauna Van Der Linda opposes HB 700 citing family's trauma from stalking incident

This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

In a recent meeting of the New Hampshire House Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee, emotional testimonies highlighted the urgent need for legislative protection against stalking. Shauna Van Der Linda, a victim's family member, passionately opposed House Bill 700, which she argued undermines the credibility of stalking victims. Her family's harrowing experience, which culminated in the tragic death of her father and severe injuries to her mother due to a stalking incident, underscored the dangers that stalking victims face.

Van Der Linda criticized the bill for including language that suggests victims may be lying, stating it could deter individuals from seeking protection. She emphasized that stalking can escalate to extreme violence, urging lawmakers to recognize the serious threat posed by stalkers, regardless of their relationship to the victim. "If a judge has determined that there are grounds to issue a protective order, they should always order the relinquishment of a firearm," she asserted, calling for stronger measures to protect citizens.

The meeting also featured input from Steven Andrews, an assistant county attorney, who echoed concerns about the bill's implications. He noted that the proposed language regarding false statements is unusual and could create unnecessary barriers for victims seeking help. Andrews pointed out that existing laws already address false allegations, suggesting that the new bill could complicate the legal process for those in need of protection.

The discussions at this meeting reflect a critical moment for New Hampshire's legislative approach to stalking and victim protection. As lawmakers consider the implications of House Bill 700, the testimonies serve as a poignant reminder of the real-life consequences of legislative decisions. The committee's next steps will be crucial in determining how effectively the state can safeguard its residents from the dangers of stalking and harassment.

Converted from House Criminal Justice and Public Safety (02/07/2025) meeting on February 13, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI