Idaho Senate advances Senate Bill 1088 to streamline psychology practices

In a pivotal meeting on February 20, 2025, the Idaho Senate Health & Welfare Committee gathered to discuss Senate Bill 1088, a proposed legislation aimed at reforming the practice of psychology in Idaho. The atmosphere was charged with anticipation as Senator Mark Harris presented the bill, highlighting its potential to remove unnecessary barriers for psychologists and enhance patient care across the state.

Senator Harris emphasized that the bill seeks to streamline the process for prescribing psychologists—licensed professionals who have completed advanced training, including a doctorate and a master's degree in clinical psychopharmacology. Currently, Idaho has only eight prescribing psychologists, a number that has stagnated since the law allowing them was enacted eight years ago. The proposed changes aim to shift from a cumbersome supervision model to a more collaborative agreement model, allowing provisional prescribing psychologists to work alongside a broader range of experienced prescribers, including practice nurses and pharmacists. This shift is expected to improve access to mental health care for Idahoans, particularly in underserved areas.

Lance Giles, a lobbyist representing the Idaho Psychological Association, echoed Senator Harris's sentiments, urging the committee to support the bill. He noted that the legislation would not only eliminate redundant language but also clarify the role of service extenders—individuals who assist licensed psychologists—ensuring that those in doctoral programs without a master's degree can still contribute to patient care.

The committee heard from several psychologists who voiced their support for the bill. Dr. Kendra Westerhouse highlighted the importance of service extenders in providing vital services, particularly in rural regions. Dr. Lynn MacArthur pointed out that the bill would facilitate continuity of care for patients who travel out of state, while Dr. Patrick Bartos shared his personal struggles with the current supervision requirements, which have hindered his ability to practice despite being qualified.

As the discussions unfolded, it became clear that the proposed legislation is not just a technical adjustment but a significant step toward improving mental health services in Idaho. The committee's deliberations will determine whether this bill will advance to the Senate floor, potentially reshaping the landscape of psychological care in the state. The outcome could pave the way for more accessible and effective mental health treatment for Idahoans, addressing a critical need in the community.