Kentucky deer farmers oppose HB 700 citing economic and regulatory concerns

The House Standing Committee on Tourism and Outdoor Recreation convened on February 27, 2025, to discuss critical issues affecting Kentucky's deer farming industry, particularly in light of proposed legislation, House Bill 700 (HB 700). The meeting featured testimonies from members of the Kentucky Alternative Livestock Association (CALA), who expressed significant concerns regarding the potential impact of the bill on their operations.

Henry Woodard, a board member of CALA and owner of a deer farm in Glasgow, Kentucky, highlighted the stringent regulations that deer farmers already adhere to, including compliance with USDA standards and the Kentucky Department of Agriculture's Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) response plan. Woodard emphasized that deer farmers test 100% of their herd for CWD, contrasting this with the state's overall testing rate, which he noted is less than 1.75% of the wild deer population. He argued that HB 700 could jeopardize the livelihoods of many farmers by restricting their ability to operate and export deer.

Jake Anderson, a deer farmer from Meade County, echoed Woodard's sentiments, stating that the financial burden imposed by HB 700 could lead to the closure of his business, which has an investment of approximately $400,000 to $500,000. He pointed out that his farm has not introduced new deer in six years, asserting that the disease cannot be present if no new animals have been brought in.

Mary Ann Hall, another deer farmer and physician assistant, added her perspective, arguing against the effectiveness of double fencing as a means to prevent the spread of CWD. She cited a decade-long study showing no transmission of CWD to cattle, reinforcing the notion that deer farming is a regulated and legitimate agricultural practice akin to raising cattle or sheep.

The testimonies underscored a collective commitment among deer farmers to manage CWD responsibly while advocating for their industry. They urged the committee to reconsider the implications of HB 700, emphasizing that the legislation could have detrimental effects on their businesses and the broader agricultural landscape in Kentucky.

As the committee deliberates, the future of deer farming in the state hangs in the balance, with stakeholders calling for policies that support both economic viability and wildlife health.