Samuel Merritt University proposes nursing enrollment increase amid Sacramento opposition

The California Board of Registered Nursing convened on February 26, 2025, to discuss significant changes to nursing program enrollments that could impact the local healthcare landscape. A key focus of the meeting was the proposed increase in student enrollment for Samuel Merritt University’s nursing programs at its Sacramento campus, which has sparked considerable debate among board members and public stakeholders.

The board considered a motion to approve an increase in enrollment from 48 to 64 students annually for the entry-level master's program and to add a summer cohort of 24 students to the accelerated bachelor's program. This proposal aims to address the growing demand for nursing education, but it has raised concerns about the availability of clinical placements and qualified faculty in the Greater Sacramento region.

Several representatives from local nursing schools voiced strong objections during the public comment period. They highlighted a critical shortage of clinical sites and qualified faculty, arguing that the region is already struggling to accommodate existing nursing programs. Stephanie Landers, a faculty member from Sacramento State School of Nursing, emphasized that the increase would exacerbate the already competitive environment for clinical placements, which are in short supply. She noted that recent approvals for other nursing programs in the area have further strained resources, making it unclear where the additional students would be placed.

Dr. Nancy James, Dean of Nursing at Sierra College, echoed these concerns, stating that the nursing workforce is already facing burnout and that adding more students could overwhelm the system. Julie Holt, director of nursing at Sacramento City College, also expressed her apprehension, citing the intense demands placed on nurses who are already stretched thin.

In response to these concerns, board members acknowledged the complexities of the situation. Some expressed a desire for more comprehensive data and input from local nursing programs before making a final decision. The board ultimately decided to proceed with the motion but emphasized the importance of ongoing dialogue with educational institutions to ensure that the nursing workforce can meet community needs without compromising quality.

As the board moves forward, the implications of these decisions will be closely monitored by local nursing schools and healthcare providers, who are keenly aware of the challenges facing the nursing profession in California. The outcome of this meeting underscores the delicate balance between expanding educational opportunities and ensuring that the necessary infrastructure is in place to support new nursing graduates in the workforce.