Mead County residents accuse officials of election corruption amid calls for hand counting
May 14, 2024 | Meade County, South Dakota
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Meade County Commission meeting held on May 14, 2024, focused heavily on concerns regarding election integrity and management in South Dakota. The session began with a dedicated discussion on election-related issues, allowing for public input on the topic.
Jim, a local resident, initiated the conversation by expressing strong dissatisfaction with the current election processes, accusing county officials of failing to represent the interests of Meade County residents. He urged the commission to resign, claiming that the management of elections should be conducted locally rather than under state oversight. He demanded clarity on how votes are audited, specifically questioning the reliability of machine testing.
Cindy Cook, another resident, echoed these sentiments, asserting that there is widespread corruption in the election system. She referenced evidence of potential cheating and raised concerns about the integrity of electronic voting machines, citing a letter from a sheriff's office in Michigan that alleged foreign interference in elections. Cook emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process.
Dale Boos, also from Meade County, questioned the actions of the Secretary of State regarding the disabling of ballot imaging functions, suggesting that such measures could compromise election security. He called for a return to hand counting ballots as a more secure and transparent method.
In contrast, Bernie, a representative from the auditor's office, defended the integrity of Meade County's elections. She highlighted the diligence of county employees in ensuring fair and accurate election processes, dismissing the allegations of widespread fraud as irrelevant to their local context.
The meeting concluded without any formal resolutions, but the discussions underscored a significant divide in public opinion regarding election management in Meade County. The commission faces ongoing pressure to address these concerns as the primary election approaches, with calls for increased transparency and local control over the electoral process.
Jim, a local resident, initiated the conversation by expressing strong dissatisfaction with the current election processes, accusing county officials of failing to represent the interests of Meade County residents. He urged the commission to resign, claiming that the management of elections should be conducted locally rather than under state oversight. He demanded clarity on how votes are audited, specifically questioning the reliability of machine testing.
Cindy Cook, another resident, echoed these sentiments, asserting that there is widespread corruption in the election system. She referenced evidence of potential cheating and raised concerns about the integrity of electronic voting machines, citing a letter from a sheriff's office in Michigan that alleged foreign interference in elections. Cook emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process.
Dale Boos, also from Meade County, questioned the actions of the Secretary of State regarding the disabling of ballot imaging functions, suggesting that such measures could compromise election security. He called for a return to hand counting ballots as a more secure and transparent method.
In contrast, Bernie, a representative from the auditor's office, defended the integrity of Meade County's elections. She highlighted the diligence of county employees in ensuring fair and accurate election processes, dismissing the allegations of widespread fraud as irrelevant to their local context.
The meeting concluded without any formal resolutions, but the discussions underscored a significant divide in public opinion regarding election management in Meade County. The commission faces ongoing pressure to address these concerns as the primary election approaches, with calls for increased transparency and local control over the electoral process.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting