[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6304455,"mediaKeyId","2461894-76d582dc1dd1fe19748b6b0e55f9b95e","parentId",2461894,"title","EDA member proposes one‑page 'policy deployment' plan to set 2–5 year priorities; board to consider in small groups next month","audioSeconds",2061,"startMs",1549000,"endMs",3610000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2461894-76d582dc1dd1fe19748b6b0e55f9b95e&start=1549&end=3610","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2461894-76d582dc1dd1fe19748b6b0e55f9b95e/thumbnail_1549000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6304455/Grayson-County/Virginia/EDA-member-proposes-onepage-policy-deployment-plan-to-set-25-year-priorities-board-to-consider-in-small-groups-next-month","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6304455-749704288a587069723ca46d767e96d3/orig.mp4?Expires=1774871231&Signature=mAbpayqORL5-6FqBrc-hTw076XjircDVoTLoFAWsNOFY6GAX9rajni6q1ISugcegN~HoFPIHVgWnPzRl7t2Hkl6A6nM5dX7mOIuL4DKB-vhXur72i68TCSfr4rnLu3QkklbIzF42aZIMf9Qy~J3xpGMclsV-85LicobJQe12XBdBMEVkhVRpWu8MM7TUhOWQtplqDv8a2SYJ~FZrIAU4LiJM9WzI8-0iDzIjqpXY96k4cbpy0sPKvEGH8UgIN9Q7HAkxsq4enC7kZGU5rLQLkBbKN222twkQhdsOl1NFG3N7j9ww4hObAYYKHJO3IUwX~rd3BYvI3fzii3Rsn5J4rw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Graysom County, VA","date","2025-02-28T10:14:05Z","article","An EDA member presented a proposed policy‑deployment process designed to focus the Grayson County Economic Development Authority on a small number of measurable 2–5 year objectives, and to track progress on a single‑page template at each meeting.

Why it matters: Proponents said the approach would make the EDA more proactive, increase accountability to taxpayers, and provide monthly visual tracking to identify projects that need support.

Proposal details
- One‑page template and tracking: The presenter described a one‑page plan that lists breakthrough objectives, associated projects, numerical targets and team members, plus a monthly traffic‑light (green/yellow/red) status for each project. The presenter recommended 2–3 major objectives at first (example objectives discussed included affordable childcare and additional affordable housing) and monthly tracking so the board can intervene early when projects slip.

- Example projects and metrics: The presenter gave sample projects for a childcare objective (research similar programs, identify partners, create a pilot) and for housing (identify candidate properties, evaluate and select top candidates, start implementation). He showed mock monthly progress charts and said the first year should be focused on establishing process and measurable targets.

Board response and concerns
Board members expressed interest but also raised concerns about time commitment, staffing and authority. Specific concerns included the amount of member time required to support proactive projects, EDA funding limits, and the EDA’s limited authority relative to the board of supervisors. Members suggested partnering with state or nonprofit organizations for resourcing and emphasized that adoption would require member buy‑in.

Next steps
The presenter said he would email the presentation and backup materials to members. The board agreed to place the item on the next meeting agenda and to consider small‑group work (pros and cons) before reaching consensus.

Quotation
\"If we want to accomplish the long term mission, you have to be, I think, more proactive,\" the presenter said while outlining the plan. \"We want to come up with the key objectives over the first 2 to 5 years. Three years is fairly typical.\"

Ending
The EDA agreed to circulate the materials and to discuss the proposal in small groups at the next meeting; no vote to adopt the framework occurred at this meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","EDA Meeting 2.27.2025","oneSentenceSummary","An EDA member presented a 'policy deployment' approach — a one‑page strategic plan with monthly tracking and green/yellow/red status — to help the Grayson County EDA choose and monitor 2–5 year priorities such as affordable childcare and housing; members agreed to circulate materials and discuss in small groups at the next meeting.","taxTitle","Grayson County, Virginia","taxId",30990,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6304461,"EDA says agreement with Raymond Sage on Visa Plus is near completion; Sage has ordered equipment and paid $25,000 deposit",174,421000,595000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2461894-76d582dc1dd1fe19748b6b0e55f9b95e&start=421&end=595","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2461894-76d582dc1dd1fe19748b6b0e55f9b95e/thumbnail_421000.jpg","/articles/6304461/Grayson-County/Virginia/EDA-says-agreement-with-Raymond-Sage-on-Visa-Plus-is-near-completion-Sage-has-ordered-equipment-and-paid-25000-deposit","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6304461-c569bcb1db3a8765e90df629ca7c2e0b/orig.mp4?Expires=1774871231&Signature=j3vdRJgWaYeUz9n8mqcws-GPbIA-uENbsnOLG1zUow7C7FbJtzszbpN~eS5rWbFhIvb9zfDCHzGnOOsip0FRddpPYw79SLGPAs6iazoYRNOHP3eyLlAcU-WyDLE-3jVn4LpsbpAPYFcOPmZtITWNUgue7ah51gmlg2feaRFPzzbZuwFAIsnmAbG85kQU5Z12ZVfc9TSW0OK~cdokKzGn-M-SWOpdDVpc9zZUIbDyjULR7B0TnzRIsYLydJTG5elfvZbHwTt0zcUXFiGJaR0jz6Bv~JNZ4RXsVMn-HkLKYi~xVAeUWC3o6tT8s6xzUZBpELud8SII1cwd95Tiu~kTxQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Grayson County Economic Development Authority said it is finalizing an agreement with Raymond Sage for a project at the Visa Plus site and expects paperwork to be ready soon for signatures.

Why it matters: Board members indicated the agreement is the final step before the EDA’s previously authorized signatories can execute the contract and Sage can move ahead with site work and equipment installation.

What board members reported
- Status of agreement: A member told the EDA that they spoke with a staff member (identified in the meeting as \"Durban\"), who expected the agreement to be ready by the following week and said he had reviewed the needed documents for the loan and grant components.

- EDA authorization: The board indicated that, at an earlier vote, the EDA had authorized two signatories (the speaker and \"Steve\") to execute the agreement once final documents were ready; the speaker said that once the agreement is complete either those signatories should sign and return it to Sage.

- Project activity and payments: The same report noted that Sage had already ordered equipment and paid $25,000 toward that equipment; staff said Sage expected the equipment to arrive in roughly 60 days and anticipated a late spring to early summer timeline for availability on site.

Quotations
\"I do know the invoice that we sent for part of the grant loan thing. He's paid he's already ordered equipment. He's paid $25,000 down on himself,\" a board member reported.

Next steps
Board members said the EDA should sign the final documents as soon as staff counsel provides them; members asked staff to notify appropriate signatories when the agreement is ready. No new formal vote on the agreement occurred during the meeting.

Ending
The EDA expects to receive finalized documents from staff counsel and directed that authorized signatories complete execution quickly so the project can proceed.","EDA members reported a pending agreement with Raymond Sage related to a Visa Plus project; counsel/staff were expected to finalize documents the following week and Sage had already ordered equipment and paid a $25,000 down payment.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6304464,"Grayson County EDA: 79 applicants receive $100,366.98 in first‑round disaster aid; process for second round still being defined",323,379000,702000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2461894-76d582dc1dd1fe19748b6b0e55f9b95e&start=379&end=702","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2461894-76d582dc1dd1fe19748b6b0e55f9b95e/thumbnail_379000.jpg","/articles/6304464/Grayson-County/Virginia/Grayson-County-EDA-79-applicants-receive-10036698-in-firstround-disaster-aid-process-for-second-round-still-being-defined","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6304464-ff0d50286cb26cec0681b9f1c6d95958/orig.mp4?Expires=1774871231&Signature=HoD9IgertGoqVpIcLG51OLMX6-ZTPOEfnkpufHJLGuJZ6JmgE3nSttOymLR3RBOFC2dNFIJUM1hayL55UluVIOpVwV5a9Il~WPf5rsL11e3mlxy8qrqqF6DUj91uA7m97bZ3std-ihtvFm-LbYXzSLZiY~XhHZEYdtrd039XKMBje3ZmWKquvuvj0ElZqYpaTI8EbUQY5l7fCf~8btRz-2VVTq1Ev9-sBLBfYaWfL4YIEm7vG4Hu0DlcOXE9T3knAVqpQLcZYRHbYoriZJTs5kHxoj0zDw1cFgMnXSiNAmNYAajy~9Y757IzVoPYQaXmWyBqP-Q7htW8y-bUnyK-Yg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Grayson County Economic Development Authority members said the EDA issued checks to 79 applicants totaling $100,366.98 as an initial round of local disaster assistance, and that a separate pool of EDA funds remains for a second distribution.

The first‑round payments came from a $300,000 allocation the EDA identified for disaster recovery. According to the discussion, the EDA used approximately half of that allocation for the initial group of recipients and is determining how to distribute the remaining funds.

Why it matters: EDA members said the local money is intended to fill gaps left by federal or programmatic aid after recent storms. Several members described examples — including out‑of‑pocket repairs for barns and fencing and costs associated with culverts and farm roads — that they said were not covered or were only partially covered by FEMA, USDA or insurance.

Details and debate
- Distribution and amounts: A staff recap said 79 applicants received checks totaling $100,366.98. Members described recipients using funds for repairs such as a barn roof replacement and fencing damaged in storms. One member said most recipients expressed appreciation for any assistance.

- Set‑aside and second round: Members reported that $300,000 had been set aside for disaster recovery; roughly half was used for the first round and an additional $100,000 (described in the meeting as the “second” tranche) remains to be allocated. The EDA has not finalized whether the second round will use the same application process, open to new applicants, or prioritize applicants who were denied or inadequately served by other programs.

- Coordination with federal and state programs: Speakers said federal assistance has been slow to reach some local applicants. A presenter told the board that substantial federal block grant funding has been authorized for Virginia and that the governor’s office and the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services are developing guidance; the presenter added that a separate $50 million item for Southwest Virginia remained subject to the governor’s signature at the time of the meeting. EDA members said they are waiting for state guidance before finalizing the second round’s rules.

- Committee and referral: Members said the ad hoc committee that reviewed the first round included representatives from the Farm Service Agency (FSA), Cooperative Extension, and local EDA staff. The committee will examine whether the second round should allow prior applicants to reapply or should be opened to producers who did not apply in the first round. One member recommended running the second round the same way as the first to give new applicants an opportunity; others urged waiting for clearer guidance from state and federal agencies so the EDA can target funds to losses that other programs do not cover.

Quotations
\"All 79 applicants did receive a check,\" a staff presenter said during the financial update. \"The total that was sent out over the 79 applicants is $100,366.98.\"

\"They have voted to set aside $300,000 to go to the final week. So we use for the first round, they used half of that to get these first applicants,\" a member said when describing the EDA’s allocation.

Next steps and timeline
Members asked staff and the committee to prepare recommendations for a second round, including whether to re‑open applications or prioritize new applicants. Staff said they would seek clearer state guidance, circulate the EDA’s materials by email and report back at the next meeting. No formal vote was taken during the meeting to finalize the second‑round process.

Ending
Members emphasized the need to target remaining funds to damages not covered by FEMA, USDA or insurance, and asked staff and committee members to bring a recommended process and timeline back to the EDA for consideration.","The Grayson County Economic Development Authority distributed $100,366.98 to 79 applicants in a first round of local disaster assistance and has roughly $100,000–$194,000 remaining for a second round; staff and committee members debated whether to open a new application round or limit funds to those who did not receive other aid.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

EDA member proposes one‑page 'policy deployment' plan to set 2–5 year priorities; board to consider in small groups next month

EDA says agreement with Raymond Sage on Visa Plus is near completion; Sage has ordered equipment and paid $25,000 deposit

Grayson County EDA: 79 applicants receive $100,366.98 in first‑round disaster aid; process for second round still being defined