[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6304602,"mediaKeyId","2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f","parentId",2458942,"title","Registry of Deeds manager urges approval of FY2026 request, cites past cuts and potential supplemental funding sources","audioSeconds",487,"startMs",3098000,"endMs",3585000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f&start=3098&end=3585","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f/thumbnail_3098000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6304602/Norfolk-County/Massachusetts/Registry-of-Deeds-manager-urges-approval-of-FY2026-request-cites-past-cuts-and-potential-supplemental-funding-sources","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6304602-a5f2bcb9efc669cb469650fe52f45bb3/orig.mp4?Expires=1776507918&Signature=QIsnnykqXEmYcrLss4hdluIm7sNOOcWthOQ2z1Awd4GZpFU3y48ypFvl4K2n4VorELaKzhl50QdbcwgyXOcls57qFafKwvvsoIerb2Q9DdaPOOnKRPgnYyqH7C90BMmUjWNbX7mxN2mY0witMvKKLUjFIL7r49FUZ-5KnQXnwNqM8rqkIPoXQcQmFlcgpypmyuFtXBuMGKrBFHv-vSWrNSAGBO-beoOeWbpDR-JTViXmLyYCBIOHC9BQpimzi4et6u~BWP9T-07pdC08znG6kj93NVPlZBiQg7Ust0RErUNak-2xNpNRYxUJv-RP30cz6P-rTN8fTRMqXLRkerb9rA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Norfolk County, MA","date","2025-02-28T22:45:15Z","article","The manager of the Norfolk County Registry of Deeds presented the registry’s fiscal 2026 budget request on Feb. 26 and urged commissioners to approve the submission, saying past cuts have left key records‑protection and contractual service lines underfunded.

Manager’s presentation and argument: the registry manager said the department’s budget has been reduced several times since fiscal 2021, when the registry budget was about $3.66 million, noting FY2025 spending of $3,082,640.82 and a decline in staff positions from 48 to 40 over recent years. He said specific budget groups (referred to as groups 2, 3 and 4) fund indexing, imaging and records‑protection services and that reductions in those codes have created operational risk.

Numbers and funding options: the manager referenced a FY2026 request figure shown on the cover page of the budget documents as $3,300,000. He described recent increases in vendor costs — including a reported 48% rise in Iron Mountain costs since FY2022 — and said a supplemental appropriation of $120,000 had been requested previously to address shortfalls. The manager outlined potential internal funding sources for supplemental payments, including available income in county accounts, deeds excise statutory shares that currently show six‑figure amounts, and other prior board allocations; he urged commissioners to consider these options rather than forcing end‑of‑year transfers.

Commission questions and scheduling: Commissioners asked for confirmation of the cover‑page number and requested additional documentation and timing. The manager said advisory board review and a recommended supplemental appropriation would follow; he referenced an advisory‑board schedule with an April 16 meeting. The commissioners voted to take the registry budget under advisement.

Ending: The registry manager asked commissioners to fund necessary operational lines upfront to avoid stop‑gap transfers during the fiscal year; commissioners asked staff to return with the supplemental appropriation request for advisory board consideration and potential action.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Norfolk County Commission Meeting 2-26-2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Registry manager asked commissioners to approve a $3.3 million FY2026 budget request, arguing prior cuts left essential records‑protection lines underfunded and outlining possible funding sources for a supplemental appropriation.","taxTitle","Norfolk County, Massachusetts","taxId",3603,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6304606,"Longtime RSVP director Robert gives final report: 92 volunteers placed, 907 rides for veterans in 10 months",242,2716000,2958000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f&start=2716&end=2958","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f/thumbnail_2716000.jpg","/articles/6304606/Norfolk-County/Massachusetts/Longtime-RSVP-director-Robert-gives-final-report-92-volunteers-placed-907-rides-for-veterans-in-10-months","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6304606-b99e474f321409bcb25bc72f0dd0c593/orig.mp4?Expires=1776507918&Signature=SQQjh9hM9gaFuE0h9s8FombgxY7uBvzhiWDbrD~h6RU580O4MbIOxnRdmH99NZYJmI5enYkvIHhp7VzpWNp4ebAMpI-zuHmax2~SlJtXg2fwUgFLFg4ZIdYnzG-pivkcl9Mbc4I1sF4UF~Nfa8nBW66ybzphpMq7IitpJnOX0Bnoayb-QZomsHhvNnLFaJLJY7SGDgtOURMT5vrBquHLx6kEuLRW1n5bqn7oKcCzn4eBRRZPCehGxjrsFfq08Lzq0z2K1xSzRiFIqG2422o-7lu2bT8wmJdc9a6hAubZIlNBERQLSqNRIBQ9dZ0-hhSnj1KavfGscr22zccIdvcFRw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Robert delivered his final RSVP program report to the Norfolk County Commissioners on Feb. 26, announcing program metrics, transition activity and staffing recommendations as he prepares to retire.

Program metrics and operations: Robert said the RSVP program currently has 92 volunteers placed across 221 active placements, with roughly 20% of volunteers serving in multiple placements. He described an active RSVP advisory board of 10 members and highlighted the program’s flagship “Rides for Vets” service. Over the past 10 months the program reported 907 rides — about 91 rides per month — and the program now has approximately 48 active drivers (with two new trainees reported during the presentation).

Transition and training: Robert said he provided two weeks of training to the new RSVP director, Lucille, covering grant reporting, partner contacts, the RSVP website and key events, and he said he delivered an updated 50‑page policies and procedures manual. He visited four volunteer sites with Lucille during the orientation. Robert urged consideration of hiring a part‑time staffer to expand and manage the rides program, saying the operation is labor intensive and would benefit from dedicated coordination.

Commissioner remarks: Commissioners and staff thanked Robert for his 10½ years as RSVP director and praised the program’s success and visibility. Several commissioners encouraged continued support for the program and endorsed Lucille’s early work and visibility efforts.

Ending: Robert said he expects to remain involved occasionally as a volunteer and thanked staff and commissioners; the board expressed appreciation and asked Lucille and advisory board members to follow through on training and grant timelines.","RSVP director Robert delivered a final report announcing program metrics, transitions to a new director Lucille and recommended staffing to expand the ‘Rides for Vets’ service.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6304611,"Port Energy and East Coast Renewable Energy pitch zero‑out‑of‑pocket EV charging rollout at county sites",698,796000,1494000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f&start=796&end=1494","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f/thumbnail_796000.jpg","/articles/6304611/Norfolk-County/Massachusetts/Port-Energy-and-East-Coast-Renewable-Energy-pitch-zerooutofpocket-EV-charging-rollout-at-county-sites","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6304611-0947e1d3ffd45377abeac2291e964b93/orig.mp4?Expires=1776507918&Signature=n0EyBqW1la7A-V6Shboj~djLj7KDWhmGZVWteqsBVMJV~dtx78zWTA4unvc1J9es-ddcspYODpZR-XS7tctjbbQh~qXyDtvy4~gfdt2MsR7l8aSlDEDk3O1c4U2SodY2WW4O4-2tYeCSI8CqveAbDX~6TgiLslAndlF08UCbmSxYbWjTCZ56aWcQFnFe5IDx7QI~I3IuuLlqmvPhzH3fI3sDUebOtSscgdSpAEJus5yKWotLF3vBYD7EZwcxrssK91DGAwkPYsBgI0pKSJwdCnWVXS6xp~H~-M-R8MED4TDpWq6hddHtmFQt~XwYs5IgYQwIIB7gSFMLC-qe4MnI3A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Representatives from Port Energy and East Coast Renewable Energy presented a proposal Feb. 26 to install electric vehicle charging stations at Norfolk County properties, saying a MassEVIP rebate and investor‑owned‑utility programs could fund installations with little or no out‑of‑pocket cost for many sites.

Presenters and credentials: Ed McClellan represented Port Energy; Nick Filuri identified himself as owner and president of East Coast Renewable Energy (ECRE) of Milford, Massachusetts; and Robert Quintel introduced himself as head of the EV division within ECRE (EBSC Solutions).

What they proposed: the companies described a “starter kit” for public sites that would typically electrify four parking spaces per county address (two dual‑port level‑2 stations). They said MassEVIP (the Massachusetts Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Program) and other incentive programs can substantially reduce capital costs. Under the scenario the presenters described, sites meeting certain conditions could be installed at “0 out of pocket cost,” with the county owning the chargers after turnkey installation. They said the network provider would take about 10% of driver revenue and return roughly 90% to the county; software would handle payments, idle fees and variable pricing.

Presenters stressed application details: level‑2 chargers are aimed at locations with longer dwell time (courthouses, parks, libraries, golf courses) and typically take hours to add range; DC fast chargers (for road‑tripping) require more electrical infrastructure and were largely subscribed under utility incentive programs. The presenters said DC fast programs had been heavily oversubscribed and that MassEVIP funds make level‑2 projects the most practical near‑term option.

Local context and potential sites: commissioners and staff identified candidate county properties for initial site surveys, including court buildings, the registry of deeds, a school and the county golf course. The presenters said they could typically survey several sites in a day if county staff provided site access and electrical‑panel information. They estimated that 60–70% of site surveys would fit the zero‑out‑of‑pocket assumptions; the remainder would show additional costs requiring separate bids.

Next steps: commissioners asked to pause final action until the full chair and the rest of the board could weigh in; the presenters were asked to provide written materials and to schedule site walks. The presenters said they could begin site surveys once county facilities staff coordinate access and provide bill information and panel details. The presenters also noted that the availability of utility rebate money is first‑come, first‑served and urged timely engagement for high‑priority locations.

Ending: Commissioners did not approve any installations at the meeting; they asked presenters to return with a prioritized site list, supporting documentation, and to schedule site walkthroughs for two to three weeks after the board gives authorization to proceed with surveys.","Presenters from Port Energy and East Coast Renewable Energy proposed using MassEVIP and utility incentives to install level‑2 chargers at public county properties at no upfront cost for many sites; commissioners requested site surveys and deferred a decision until the full board could weigh in.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6304615,"Engineering director seeks survey‑crew chief and plotter in FY2026 request; commissioners take request under advisement",199,500000,699000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f&start=500&end=699","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f/thumbnail_500000.jpg","/articles/6304615/Norfolk-County/Massachusetts/Engineering-director-seeks-surveycrew-chief-and-plotter-in-FY2026-request-commissioners-take-request-under-advisement","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6304615-f0c4aad0756982fe1253dc0ef4d4ea6d/orig.mp4?Expires=1776507918&Signature=P3ZwnD19QTUencV6QtDWKpth7NKVmuJOqtCZzFhzQqd19mRgteBxFx5gntc~LZpgVKTH9sWYgOBxYL2rpVW46n2tZx942X2j9rvpV0-NO61aBOn5eyHGVXZvfe6B9v0FA2tKz96XwitU3cuWPnbWtO3oS3aZkZD0LfrmXGkXAvt0zJl3X1q0WcCUYcsatkWsnnFiU72yzxEUq-zGTFfmgovEpKz784-00e05wHHds5oU9QW9Y0B1C0ylZiW7ywG6hD~sxh-563PSF0hsnoHa3m0kWGQ4St8wErky~Muw6Ta6surD3EGLDcnXGlJa8sjtx5QymfedzP-x6uMdbZysoQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Norfolk County engineering director presented a fiscal 2026 request that is largely level‑funded except for two items: an increase to software subscriptions and a proposed new permanent position.

The director said the operating budget line for software and maintenance would rise from $20,000 to $23,000 to reflect higher subscription costs. Separately, he requested adding a permanent survey crew chief position at a maximum salary of $76,630, citing limited field and office capacity that reduces the department’s ability to take on work for towns and county projects. The director said adding that position would allow in‑house crews to maintain field productivity while keeping office work moving.

Capital needs: the director also listed a capital request, noting a plotter past its life cycle and estimating the cost at about $16,000–$17,000 if funds are available.

Commissioner questions and disposition: Commissioners pressed for justification and metrics to show workload increases and whether the new hire would increase productivity and volume of in‑house work. The director explained that when multiple senior staff must work in the field, office workflows stall; an additional crew chief would preserve both field and office throughput. A motion to take the engineering budget request under advisement was made, seconded and approved by voice vote.

Ending: The engineering department’s request will be reviewed further; commissioners asked the director to supply justification data on workload and town requests before a final decision.","The county engineering director asked to add a permanent survey crew chief position and a plotter replacement, noting productivity constraints; commissioners voted to take the request under advisement.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6304619,"Norfolk County treasurer outlines modest FY2026 budget increase, commissioners take request under advisement",182,113000,295000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f&start=113&end=295","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2458942-361c4d0370a9fef265759bbf49fdc56f/thumbnail_113000.jpg","/articles/6304619/Norfolk-County/Massachusetts/Norfolk-County-treasurer-outlines-modest-FY2026-budget-increase-commissioners-take-request-under-advisement","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6304619-21936ed5cc6b76f73ad9c1ad5179af63/orig.mp4?Expires=1776507918&Signature=UkqIxbiDM5Kq0ix2pnsZyRrFTDXXSYKWUZCIwz2hfS7blrnP0wMG7gryu0aSGb8w6l6BOY9Y-es68WWQZSL-Ga1kcjMRafSiEPHzMSEKjW-C6NExZsu88ZNi6DrQZC79lXq2dAGDpHW9iFfPPtBEn-Coe81n2No1S02wuax1zz4rTlL7eiHwcTYIdtBydr081nKNUwC9Aj6SDtfpC2oaEe2yjvi1EcxwywJBWjWhpZCKJf7TvU-i5eiQOigqOUgy903nn5MXExrYdCfY2xA4YXyku9aBJb4~2CAiWqU~ZitAAqeWTE9JYAspJfDm5hyZFyE88sVhZMOyHAfb9KjzWg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Treasurer Michael presented the Norfolk County treasurer's proposed fiscal 2026 operating budget at the Feb. 26 commissioners meeting, saying the request represents “an increase of about 4.71%,” roughly $28,000, but that he expects to find savings to lower the net impact.

The treasurer told commissioners that a proposed change includes increasing an existing staff position from four to five days a week, a line he identified as a roughly $19,000 personnel increase to cover duties such as expense warrants, vendor work and bank reconciliations. He also described a $15,000 temporary-salaries line that he said he is willing to remove, an $8,000 payroll-consultant line intended to fund a workflow analysis and succession planning, a $200 increase in printing and binding and a $100 increase in PO box rent. The treasurer said the county could use the consultant funds to document workflows and to develop a detailed job description to ease an eventual transition for long‑time staff.

Why it matters: the treasurer emphasized that many departments face fiscal pressure and said his office is trying to minimize the request while keeping core services intact. He framed the payroll consultant as a risk‑management and continuity expense so the office can recruit and train a replacement if long‑time staff depart.

Commission discussion and next steps: commissioners asked about retaining temporary salary funding to cover recruitment and overlap for training if a staff departure occurs. The treasurer said permanent hires would be added to the permanent payroll line and reiterated his willingness to remove the temporary-salary line. After discussion, a commissioner moved to take the treasurer's budget matter under advisement; the motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.

Budget details and clarifications: the treasurer provided the following line items and clarifications during his presentation:
- Proposed overall increase: about 4.71% (~$28,000) before adjustments.
- Proposed one‑day-per‑week increase for a staff member (Laurie) to five days: about $19,000.
- Temporary salaries line: $15,000 (the treasurer offered to remove it from the request).
- Payroll‑consultant line: $8,000 to support workflow analysis and transition planning.
- Printing and binding increase: $200.
- PO box rent increase: $100.
- Computer equipment decrease: $200.

The treasurer also said some increases reflect non‑discretionary longevity pay for existing employees. He noted the office would attempt to identify savings to reduce the requested increase.

Ending: Commissioners did not vote to adopt the treasurer's FY2026 request at the meeting; they moved to take the proposal under advisement for further review and scheduled continued budget deliberations for subsequent weeks.","Treasurer Michael presented a FY2026 budget with a proposed 4.7% increase driven by staffing and consulting lines; commissioners agreed to take the budget under advisement for further review.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Registry of Deeds manager urges approval of FY2026 request, cites past cuts and potential supplemental funding sources

Longtime RSVP director Robert gives final report: 92 volunteers placed, 907 rides for veterans in 10 months

Port Energy and East Coast Renewable Energy pitch zero‑out‑of‑pocket EV charging rollout at county sites

Engineering director seeks survey‑crew chief and plotter in FY2026 request; commissioners take request under advisement

Norfolk County treasurer outlines modest FY2026 budget increase, commissioners take request under advisement