Montana Legislature adjusts nonresident upland game licenses for 2025

This article was created by AI using a key topic of the bill. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the full bill. Link to Bill

The Montana Legislature convened on March 1, 2025, to introduce House Bill 372, a legislative proposal aimed at revising the licensing structure for nonresident hunters of upland game birds and big game in the state. The bill seeks to amend existing statutes regarding the fees and age requirements for various hunting licenses, specifically targeting nonresident hunters aged 12 and older.

Key provisions of House Bill 372 include adjustments to the fees for Class B-1 and Class B-2 nonresident upland game bird licenses. The Class B-1 license fee is proposed to increase from $110 to $150, while the Class B-2 license fee will rise from $50 to $70. Additionally, the bill stipulates that both licenses will allow holders aged 12 and older to hunt upland game birds and possess their carcasses, aligning with the regulations set forth by the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks.

The bill also addresses the Class B-10 nonresident big game combination license, proposing an increase in the fee from $981 to $1,312. This license permits nonresident hunters aged 12 and older to engage in big game hunting, subject to state regulations.

Debate surrounding House Bill 372 has centered on the implications of increased fees for nonresident hunters, with proponents arguing that the revenue generated will support wildlife conservation efforts and enhance hunting infrastructure in Montana. Opponents, however, express concerns that higher costs may deter nonresident hunters, potentially impacting local economies that benefit from hunting tourism.

The economic implications of this bill are significant, as nonresident hunters contribute substantially to Montana's economy through spending on licenses, equipment, and local services. As such, the proposed fee increases could have a dual effect: bolstering state revenues while also risking a decline in nonresident participation if costs become prohibitive.

As House Bill 372 progresses through the legislative process, stakeholders from various sectors, including conservation groups, local businesses, and hunting organizations, are closely monitoring its developments. The outcome of this bill could reshape the landscape of hunting in Montana, influencing both conservation funding and the state's appeal as a hunting destination. The next steps will involve committee reviews and potential amendments before a final vote is scheduled.

Converted from House Bill 372 bill
Link to Bill

Comments

    View Bill

    This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

    View Bill

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI