The Nebraska Legislature's Appropriations Committee meeting on February 27, 2025, focused on critical discussions surrounding education funding, particularly the implications of the ACT test on the state's educational landscape and economic development.

A significant topic was the impact of the ACT scores on Nebraska's appeal to families and businesses. Committee members expressed concerns about the state's ACT scores, which have declined since the implementation of a law mandating all public school juniors to take the test. While the overall scores decreased, it was noted that this trend may not accurately reflect student performance due to the increased number of test-takers. The committee discussed how educational quality, as indicated by ACT scores, could influence families' decisions to relocate to Nebraska and attract businesses looking to establish operations in the state.

The conversation also highlighted the importance of marketing Nebraska's educational achievements. Committee members suggested that better communication about the state's testing policies and outcomes could help counteract negative perceptions stemming from lower scores. They emphasized the need for a strategic approach to educate potential residents and businesses about the value of Nebraska's educational system.

Additionally, the meeting addressed concerns regarding early literacy and reading scores, which have shown troubling trends since 2015. The Department of Education's budget request included measures aimed at improving reading outcomes, particularly for third graders. The committee acknowledged the necessity of investing in assessment systems and collaborating with Educational Service Units (ESUs) to enhance educational support across the state.

The testimony from Jeremy Henniger, a lead policy analyst at ACT, underscored the significance of maintaining funding for the ACT. He argued that the data provided by the ACT is crucial for evaluating school performance and ensuring accountability. Henniger pointed out that ceasing funding for the ACT could disrupt educational improvement efforts and negatively impact students, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds.

In conclusion, the discussions during the meeting underscored the interconnectedness of education quality, economic development, and the importance of strategic communication in shaping Nebraska's future. The committee's focus on addressing reading scores and maintaining the ACT as a key assessment tool reflects a commitment to enhancing educational outcomes and fostering a favorable environment for families and businesses alike.