Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Montana legislature mandates predator relocation consultation with counties and tribes

March 01, 2025 | Introduced House Bills, 2025 House and Senate Bills, Montana Legislation Bills, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Montana legislature mandates predator relocation consultation with counties and tribes
Montana's House Bill 648 is stirring the pot in the 69th Legislature, aiming to reshape how large predators are managed across the state. Introduced on March 1, 2025, the bill mandates that county commissioners and tribal governments be consulted before any state or federal decisions regarding the relocation of large predators, such as bears, mountain lions, and wolves.

The bill's key provisions require state agencies to notify local authorities at least 30 days prior to the release or relocation of these animals. This includes immediate communication within 24 hours of capturing a large predator if it is to be moved outside its original county or tribal boundaries. The intent is clear: to ensure that local governments have a say in decisions that could impact agricultural production, livestock safety, and human health.

Supporters argue that the bill empowers local communities, allowing them to voice concerns about potential risks associated with large predators. However, it has not been without controversy. Critics worry that the increased bureaucratic process could delay necessary wildlife management actions, potentially leading to conflicts between humans and wildlife.

The implications of HB 648 extend beyond local governance. Economically, it could affect agricultural operations and tourism, as the presence of large predators can influence both livestock management and outdoor recreational activities. Politically, the bill reflects a growing tension between conservation efforts and local interests, highlighting the ongoing debate over wildlife management in Montana.

As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its fate remains uncertain. Stakeholders are closely watching, as the outcome could set a precedent for how wildlife policies are shaped in the future, balancing ecological needs with community concerns.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI