[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6653166,"mediaKeyId","2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614","parentId",2485506,"title","Board records several budget decisions including recognition of school revenue and a county stipend for state probation officers","audioSeconds",453,"startMs",2674000,"endMs",2221000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614&start=2674&end=2221","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614/thumbnail_2674000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6653166/Virginia/Board-records-several-budget-decisions-including-recognition-of-school-revenue-and-a-county-stipend-for-state-probation-officers","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653166-19a98dcc4e4e69ecfea58bc9e966bd17/orig.mp4?Expires=1775702927&Signature=HMrO5z-53joivwJtj5nS58hPIEBALLQiEwLcaiBH0nZX958Nn0dIEstSAsag1hyNu9AfBc94cM2rjz9C7zsgGLNysbJpEokRbII99dBpi4ulfK5pfJyAqFUORXM4m8KscKU19hPnH7KxxS-cAhqJ5p~4v3YMtmuaYxJTeCOQq7WWMHPJo1ueIe31e-QJkFQl0KclyjOfTsmzqVHCtuplzRS2FLlDh-nI3uOmSe3qOuOKHtTEkGchhjVb08onL6Z7DM1WDldBSCBoQu1RJYMPLJhQWJnqyRd0jw59TeVzu1ppnfEccS3KFICDw6hXk6afIrQXUmBPNHT1e~FfKLjXGw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Loudoun County","date","2025-03-03T00:00:00Z","article","The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors recorded multiple formal actions at its March budget work session as it began FY 2026 budget deliberations.

The board considered two competing sets of tax-rate guidance, accepted new state school revenue and adjusted the county transfer to Loudoun County Public Schools, corrected a funding error in the human services nonprofit grant program, and approved a recurring local salary supplement for the District 25 state probation and parole office.

Why it matters: The votes set the starting point for subsequent budget amendments and identify a handful of specific policy choices — how to treat personal property rates after the General Assembly’s changes, how much of newly available state school aid the county will pass to local schools, and whether the county will supplement state salaries for local probation officers.

What the board acted on (high level)
- Tax-rate guidance: An alternate motion from Supervisor Subrata Tacconi proposing a different combination of general personal property and vehicle rates (restoring the general personal property rate to $4.20 and lowering the vehicle rate for tax year 2026 to $3.25) failed; the board then adopted the county-administrator proposed starting rates that staff had recommended.
- Human services nonprofit grants: The board approved a correction that increased funding for the human services nonprofit grant program by 3 percent (a technical fix of $86,000 noted by staff).
- Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) transfer: The board recognized $15,100,000 in new state revenue for LCPS and approved lowering the county transfer consistent with staff options; the adopted action left LCPS able to use a portion of the state funding to distribute $1,000 bonuses to eligible staff across FY 2025–26 as described in staff materials.
- Probation and parole stipend: The board approved a recurring local supplement for the District 25 state probation and parole office to make local pay competitive with nearby jurisdictions; the board set the supplement at 17 percent (recurring) pending staff finalization of the exact fiscal-dollar effects for wrap-up.

Votes at a glance (formal actions recorded in the meeting transcript)
- Alternate tax-rate motion (Supervisor Subrata Tacconi): motion failed (ayes: 2; nays: 5; absent: 2). The transcript records Supervisors Tacconi and Kirschner in support; others opposed.
- Adopt county-administrator proposed starting budget rates and the $86,000 correction to human services nonprofit grants: motion passed (7–0–2, per transcript).
- Recognize $15,100,000 state LCPS revenue and adjust county transfer per staff packet: motion passed (7–0–2, per transcript).
- Add recurring 17% salary supplement for District 25 State Probation and Parole employees: motion approved; staff to compute final fiscal numbers for wrap-up.
- Add $80,000 to fund a county-sponsored Independence Day event at Hal and Bernie Hanson Park beginning in 2026 (motion carried; recorded as approved in the transcript).

What the board asked staff to do: staff will return with more detailed fiscal impacts for any remaining options the board wants to consider before final adoption, and will provide final figures for locally funded stipends and for the LCPS transfer when requested.

Provenance: meeting transcript passages introducing each motion and recording results appear across the budget work session (topic start and finish excerpts captured in the meeting record).","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Loudoun County - Board of Supervisors FY26 Budget Work Session - Mar 03, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors recorded multiple formal actions at its March budget work session as it began FY 2026 budget deliberations.","taxTitle","Loudoun County, Virginia","taxId",5640,"location","Virginia","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6653152,"Clerk asks for expungement and probate staff to handle rising caseloads and new state mandate",315,3282000,3597000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614&start=3282&end=3597","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614/thumbnail_3282000.jpg","/articles/6653152/Virginia/Clerk-asks-for-expungement-and-probate-staff-to-handle-rising-caseloads-and-new-state-mandate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653152-33d54d2b5d5d4f8eef5cf18700d930a3/orig.mp4?Expires=1775702927&Signature=ET8x~TytFMO53gUf97xI0MdizlzLWguzL-gkOpkcIdwzQ~CurtXwUJwO8L5-0YJ-U6bpxjN~5P4KLOEssozHlEjwrz0qDuUwAw9f-Wuuwyf9o1D5DpPSKTyNOPbA1wwNpJU1PCHynSPfdvNdIOEBiWQGQZNk~wPIIf4ldwGU~RLw3xPFRA7wPZUi92I~Y8bn~zqOIEuIoAviRv-lzz7kDVkHn-zlPg0ATZr~OVj8FyrBvnvwbJo5hFBRuwxMq8bKMFLLcuFAY-J-SwukUA862lgznxiIyH9R7YQs9qoFEMyUv~15mmEwyB1TgtcrNOeWhOjbs-jeUFOOY1Fr8d3bWQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Loudoun County’s Clerk of Circuit Court, Gary Clemens, presented three priority resource requests tied to rising courthouse workloads and an imminent new statutory mandate to seal certain records.

Expungement/sealing implementation: Clemens said recent state action will require clerks statewide to seal certain expunged cases automatically and to manage petitions for other cases; the Supreme Court’s office is developing a technology solution, but the clerk’s office needs local implementation capacity. Clemens asked for a judicial-projects specialist to coordinate the filing, indexing, public outreach and technical work required to ensure statutorily eligible records are sealed and made unavailable where required. He described anticipated complexities including automatic sealing, partial sealing for specific documents, and petition-based filings with no fee.

Probate and guardianship workload: The clerk said probate and guardianship filings have increased substantially — he reported a multi-year rise that the office expects to continue — and asked for a probate specialist to preserve current response times (he cited an average appointment scheduling time and the desire to maintain a roughly nine-day appointment window for probate hearings). The probate team also manages qualification for guardianships; the clerk said adding staff would preserve customer service and permit expanded service options, such as Saturday hours and satellite-court offerings.

Visiting judge/workload support: Clemens noted Loudoun relies heavily on visiting judges (he reported roughly 75 percent of all court days staffed by visiting judges) and said the county needs additional local capacity to support that workload. The clerk asked for a resource that would help manage an increasing number of visiting-judge days while the locality continues to press for an additional permanent judge in the judicial circuit.

State funding and cost-sharing: Clemens said the state compensation board has appropriated funding for clerks statewide for this expungement effort; Loudoun’s expected share was not finalized in the meeting but Clemens estimated the state grant could cover roughly 36–50 percent of the judicial-projects specialist salary depending on qualifications.

Why it matters: The new sealing/expungement requirement could affect decades of court records; the clerk argued that correct and timely implementation is essential to protect individual rights and avoid leaving eligible records visible in background checks and employment screenings.

Speakers: Gary Clemens, Clerk of the Circuit Court; county staff and multiple supervisors asked clarifying questions about caseload trends and scheduling.

Provenance: Clemens’ presentation and Q&A are recorded in the budget work session transcript when the clerk’s office presented its FY26 requests.","Circuit court clerk Gary Clemens asked the board for three FY26 positions — a judicial projects specialist to manage a newly mandated sealing/expungement process, a probate specialist to handle rising probate and guardianship filings, and staff support tied to visiting-judge workload.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6653156,"Sheriff outlines staffing, decentralization and victim‑advocate expansion in FY26 budget request",277,6576000,6853000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614&start=6576&end=6853","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614/thumbnail_6576000.jpg","/articles/6653156/Virginia/Sheriff-outlines-staffing-decentralization-and-victimadvocate-expansion-in-FY26-budget-request","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653156-35d9d2d000c625765fd26acf394ed54f/orig.mp4?Expires=1775702927&Signature=OZVBtQGtttW28rxDzw2utguteD2mdchXs6Bdap5PwUJgf9cPuH~EV2myknvsptQ0nSnMVrANKNrGVt7eT6Vjx3miTGGUhLGumIeXg8IPgXmb7SYUOUPcmX-~ZgbpNI~NKFcTWv8SLl7EBdSO~iAlC0uy7sXL9Nb93uSPMqPimLby~Z27M~TQlnq2fn7tjafiFfRsXtpdA~c~ht1269dah~bXNDysiS8KIlzYuEl~b1R~2Ii5vsS5vFyW6ogZ-HdrJmffsH9s3QH0PMKxW58g~Md5H4QZzv0QqVtRazyAQwZAxdySR80sgVN8Hn0yeZF7T0YY0dhIzv17QQSY7PpGpw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Loudoun County Sheriff Mike Chapman told supervisors the Sheriff’s Office request for FY 2026 is intended to align staffing with rising operational demands and recommendations from the department’s 2021 International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) study.

What the sheriff requested: Chapman described a multi-faceted package that totaled 61 positions the department views as needed over time; 23 positions were included in the county administrator’s proposed budget. The department’s priorities described in the meeting transcript included:
- Converting six temporary positions to regular status (administrative assistant, public information officer, civilian financial detective, two civilian background detectives and an ADC program assistant).
- Enhancing field operations with 13 positions, including five second-lieutenants for decentralization (initially focused on establishing an Eastern Loudoun station command), plus positions to enable a three‑shift patrol model and improved supervision during peak hours.
- Building out a victim‑advocate unit with four positions (two civilian victim advocates, one civilian manager and a first lieutenant) to provide trauma-informed support and follow-up outside the courtroom.
- Additional requests (outside the FY26 recommended package) included training-center staffing, traffic-safety unit expansion and a phased elementary school resource-officer program.

Why it matters: Chapman framed decentralization and a shift to three operational patrol shifts as a way to align personnel with peak demand and provide more consistent community-oriented policing in service areas. The victim-advocate expansion intends to provide earlier, specialized support for victims of sexual and violent crimes and to allow investigators and uniform deputies to focus on investigations.

Board reaction and context: Supervisors asked clarifying questions about where positions would be assigned (Eastern Loudoun station was cited as an initial decentralization pilot), whether the requests would satisfy IACP recommendations and how many vacancies the sheriff currently has (the sheriff reported total agency vacancies around 66 at the time of the discussion). Multiple supervisors emphasized the workload in the southern and western parts of the county and asked about parking-enforcement civilian positions that could relieve deputies for other duties.

Implementation notes: The sheriff said the proposed conversion of temporary to permanent positions is the department’s top priority. Staffing decisions will be phased and informed by workload analysis; the department emphasized recruiting and retention trends and the multi-year nature of operational adjustments.

Speakers (key participants)
- Sheriff Mike Chapman — presented the department’s FY26 requests.
- Lieutenant Colonels Chris Sawyer and Bob Mosher — accompanied the sheriff and were available for operational detail.

Provenance: Sheriff’s presentation and supervisor Q&A appear in the transcript when the sheriff’s office presented its FY26 request; the transcript records detailed position descriptions and counts.","Loudoun County Sheriff Mike Chapman presented a multi-part FY26 staffing request covering conversion of temporary positions to permanent roles, field operations decentralization with additional leadership for a third shift, expansion of a victim-advocate unit and other training and traffic safety positions.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":46,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6653161,"Board rejects alternate personal-property tax proposal, adopts staff starting rates for FY26 deliberations",1295,926000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614&start=926&end=2221","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2485506-fee016e3f4bba0d83b0afaf28c71b614/thumbnail_926000.jpg","/articles/6653161/Virginia/Board-rejects-alternate-personal-property-tax-proposal-adopts-staff-starting-rates-for-FY26-deliberations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6653161-2223c0cd4c84363eb37cdcf43f1382e1/orig.mp4?Expires=1775702927&Signature=WCPvw54yU9rjSD9kIkkyN2wppvMGOmxaqdyz3cMuHOptiAT6YFR9QnMr20IMddjIdnym6pWgoAWD8P5klp76sWztSWO2Kgs6aFGeiqxpt5pqCTRGqhjX3Ks9ohgXyDrsAWeOWMpcvSO8k4eOlyTN-pCygyTM1oUx~Lu5k3uH-6W7yMCC~Vzb2ZjgJ4-qe-CcuEEgUcOOcTueavkmMYtN4AkwCY0c-qSZnXqz4wrbiRL~1yrWpTnQahGt5cQ4Y2DSOOjgZJRbqqRZruOnV2BcS01Zdhqy1drlXUmpMLWVggBUyLsm0-vp20Sr24xvmO2RZg4g-KHFazjJg-xDf5TJlA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Loudoun County supervisors debated whether to restore a historic general personal-property tax rate that would chiefly affect data-center computer equipment and other non-vehicle property while using savings to reduce vehicle taxes.

Supervisor Subrata Tacconi moved an alternate set of starting rates that would have kept the general personal-property rate at the historic $4.20 and cut the vehicle personal property rate to $3.25 for tax year 2026. Tacconi argued the change would “provide relief for residents” by lowering the vehicle tax and that the general rate historically had been $4.20 for decades. The motion text recorded in the transcript began: “I move that the Board of Supervisors begin budget deliberations at the real property tax rate of 0.805 for tax year 2025, the general personal property tax rate of 4.20 … and the personal property tax rate on vehicles … 3.25 for tax year 2026.”

But county staff cautioned about unintended consequences. County budget staff and the county’s chief financial presenter warned that raising the general personal-property rate would increase the county’s reliance on revenue from data-center computer equipment — a rapidly growing and concentrated revenue source — and would raise taxes for many small businesses and other personal-property owners. The county’s fiscal presentation noted that computer equipment already represents a significant share of the general personal-property taxable base and has been growing quickly. Staff advised that the proposed personal-property structure in the administrator’s proposed budget better balances risk and revenue stability.

After extended discussion, the alternate motion failed on a recorded voice vote (aye: 2; nay: 5; 2 supervisors absent). The board then adopted the county administrator’s package as the starting point for budget deliberations: a real-property rate of $0.805, a general personal-property rate of $4.15 and a vehicle personal-property rate of $3.48 for tax year 2026, along with a staff correction that increased the human services nonprofit grant pool by 3 percent (an $86,000 correction staff described as an omission in the packet).

Why it matters: The choice sets which revenue streams the county will lean on as it finalizes the FY26 budget. Staff flagged the risk of concentrating revenues in computer-equipment assessments; supervisors who opposed the alternate motion cited the need for more analysis and the risk of increasing dependence on a single revenue source.

Speakers (key participants)
- Supervisor Subrata Tacconi — moved the alternate tax-rate motion.
- Chair Turner — made the county-administrator base motion after the alternate failed.
- Miss Burke — Office of Management & Budget staff presenting packet details and revenue implications.
- Mr. Hemstreet — county budget/finance staff who explained the revenue-concentration risks.

Provenance: discussion and the two recorded voice votes appear in the meeting transcript during the portion where the board took up the alternate motion and the subsequent base motion (topic introduction and vote results captured in the official transcript).","An alternate motion to raise the general personal property rate to $4.20 while lowering the vehicle rate to $3.25 failed; the board adopted the county administrator’s proposed starting tax rates and corrected a funding error for human-service nonprofit grants.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board records several budget decisions including recognition of school revenue and a county stipend for state probation officers

Clerk asks for expungement and probate staff to handle rising caseloads and new state mandate

Sheriff outlines staffing, decentralization and victim‑advocate expansion in FY26 budget request

Board rejects alternate personal-property tax proposal, adopts staff starting rates for FY26 deliberations