[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6301525,"mediaKeyId","2487715-04310fa05e8ae8511b3ca1f4ef3ecd2f","parentId",2487715,"title","Commission continues several primary-plat items to March 24","audioSeconds",161,"startMs",347000,"endMs",508000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2487715-04310fa05e8ae8511b3ca1f4ef3ecd2f&start=347&end=508","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2487715-04310fa05e8ae8511b3ca1f4ef3ecd2f/thumbnail_347000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6301525/Greenwood/Johnson-County/Indiana/Commission-continues-several-primary-plat-items-to-March-24","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6301525-4759cec3782ffe703ed7f794b108e33e/orig.mp4?Expires=1775394165&Signature=DZ-ZqBBqg5-iiOJt1z~vnCiXZE5VFR7hXX12lCHy4I98lZmcZy73rl7HFD4WZgZnsMg8BsQP8~apSL3ihPbRYMVpDYi~gjabQ8t07gvNLEjePHA9mNF1cDU6ECv4h46t~VS4ejNa1kSdNG6br5dPJOIVDPSRUBQ8OVWdihhK-tI6Bh3UZjjNiwfr6xVfU3qiXD9vF3PXho8pGORKtEU4WgMHiP7uF3vUGsrU2LGd8kgOze972dclnRH8REHUkCgcGwBl8hkpHpdWgmYzKi8-YnvSgWUah-7UX50IArmz9grHEmgBAxTBZ7InJdKiA9vCyxEd9xtfMWMcQmntgcf9rw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City Council of Greenwood IN","date","2025-03-03T23:40:41Z","article","At its Feb. 24 meeting the Greenwood Advisory Planning Commission continued multiple primary-plat items to the March 24 meeting so petitioners could address technical-review committee comments.

Centerville Park (PC2024-077) — Staff requested a continuance after identifying outstanding items including street calming, drainage, and a curb cut requiring coordination with the Indiana Department of Transportation. Taylor Navarre, representing Lennar Homes, asked for a 30-day continuance; the commission continued the matter to the March 24 meeting by unanimous vote (9-0).

Leatherwood Trails (BC2024-481) — Rhine Homes representative Mike Gordon said a traffic study remained outstanding and requested a 30-day continuance to submit that study to the technical review committee. Staff agreed. Commissioner Walker moved to continue to March 24; Commissioner Price seconded, and the motion carried 9-0.

Sacro Park primary plat — the commission noted this item had also been continued to March 24 during the meeting's recap.

Why it matters: The continuances give petitioners time to address TRC comments and provide studies (for example, a traffic study) required before the commission can make recommendations on the primary plats.

Ending
All continuance motions recorded at this time carried unanimously, and the items will return to the March 24 meeting for further action.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Plan Commission Meeting 02-24-2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Greenwood Advisory Planning Commission continued Centerville Park, Leatherwood Trails and Sacro Park primary plat items to the March 24 meeting to allow petitioners to address technical-review comments and submit required studies.","taxTitle","Greenwood, Johnson County, Indiana","taxId",4102,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6301529,"Greenwood panel extends Redwood Apartments Phase 2 approvals",165,44000,209000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2487715-04310fa05e8ae8511b3ca1f4ef3ecd2f&start=44&end=209","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2487715-04310fa05e8ae8511b3ca1f4ef3ecd2f/thumbnail_44000.jpg","/articles/6301529/Greenwood/Johnson-County/Indiana/Greenwood-panel-extends-Redwood-Apartments-Phase-2-approvals","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6301529-f31009767fa8947c837a5ebd1d9fd03d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775394165&Signature=kKt0andHbJa11KQss3DvpvRwsH5GaGO8tCaysCXDc-Ki1c2YChSKVRSAyDOcXKLgU~mBDyR5drRVro~s7xgg4Mx0CzVNaac0r43dqAOPb5rhMvfBqazkUOl6OofLPL3ozlNAp6gc5O7JOAA8hQbs-X3bGvuHyj3xp3CQ8sU0bPXoureD1VAPgAuoNcGYrtGslZamUcJIYgyjYewK992LmCs0G3JPjpsbAp5Ao0DvsX7SCMX-hmQquD69fmn04ITu3qauBByKFfQLAdLBXeWvRnTYKWwjPMH3jGoR8~zC7AYpTHjofzxBjvt~d8TLWl7jt4HTPEdxkGyCnsBMWDZLKQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Greenwood Advisory Planning Commission voted Feb. 24 to extend approvals for Redwood Apartments Phase 2 after petitioners told the commission they are not yet ready to develop the next phase.

The first motion addressed petition PC2022-029, a commercial site-plan approval for Redwood Apartments Phase 2. Josh Kravler of American StructurePoint, participating by Zoom, told the commission the developer is not currently positioned to build phase two and requested the maximum two-year extension. Staff reported no objection to the extension. Commissioner Walker moved to grant the extension through March 22, 2027, subject to addressing staff comments before release; Commissioner Lacey seconded. The motion carried 9-0.

A separate motion covered the primary plat approval, recorded as PC2022-062. Greg Thurman of Redwood and Josh Kravler again asked for additional time. The commission approved a primary-plat extension to July 6, 2027, subject to technical-review conditions; Commissioner Stambaugh moved, and Commissioner King seconded. The motion carried 9-0.

Why it matters: The extensions keep the development approvals active while preventing expiration of site-plan and plat approvals. Staff conditions require petitioners to address outstanding technical-review comments before final releases.

Quotes and details
Josh Kravler (American StructurePoint) said: \"We're requesting the extension; we're not in a position to develop the phase 2 of this yet, but we expect to be in the next year.\" (Josh Kravler).

Both extensions were approved with identical conditions that staff comments be addressed before final release. Each vote was unanimous, recorded as 9-0.

Ending
The commission’s approvals maintain the developer’s current approvals through the new expiration dates while reserving staff oversight to ensure technical comments are addressed prior to issuance of permits or final releases.","The Advisory Planning Commission granted two separate extensions for Redwood Apartments Phase 2: a site-plan approval extension to March 22, 2027, and a primary-plat approval extension to July 6, 2027; both motions carried unanimously.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6301534,"Planning commission approves two changes for Davis Homes commitments, delays third for legal review",1932,738000,2670000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2487715-04310fa05e8ae8511b3ca1f4ef3ecd2f&start=738&end=2670","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2487715-04310fa05e8ae8511b3ca1f4ef3ecd2f/thumbnail_738000.jpg","/articles/6301534/Greenwood/Johnson-County/Indiana/Planning-commission-approves-two-changes-for-Davis-Homes-commitments-delays-third-for-legal-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6301534-cd337930d7c570d50867e2a73e9d1ff6/orig.mp4?Expires=1775394165&Signature=CpJzb60Q1Doi7ALKJqVaFcqiB6JtHkTEzqqlr~f9u53LHTm5ybyVTmyfRMtRqTKF689tTlFwrW2DF4t43opXEfw2kKypsF22D~0BAhr7r8B4SPEKyzu7cy7Fuq0tEytS3VMq-JEV1iVRIXGdcarqXj8PfNMBEGpXn15qYk~Cqo-atu~9fe2C6XblzZ5j~vhVHh2JwGPW8OjtR0~T455WSRJOK2T9AMmUHv1cGH6dhLv9FOs-jC~WGhgpcRZFAQVFwO5jfB4EBotnf2cHr3JUMr5SNt8VvKj0sgo7ldvFZqGBti0GmPK1FJJ8OSOJB7vxjaAtmlkTVxherl42TSap7g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Greenwood Advisory Planning Commission on Feb. 24 approved modifications to two of the rezoning commitments attached to a 32.93-acre Davis Homes development and continued a third commitment for two weeks for legal and boundary review.

The actions followed a public hearing on petition PC2025-007, when attorney Scribe Bay of Baywood Law Firm, representing the petitioner Davis Homes, asked the commission to revise three of the commitments that were entered during an earlier annexation and rezoning (Ordinance 21-14). Bay said Davis Homes can accept most previous commitments but seeks to change two items and clarify a third. \"All internal roads per municipal code shall be constructed per city agreement standards. Internal roads shall be public,\" Bay read as the proposed amended wording for the internal-roads commitment, and staff signaled support for that change.

Why it matters: The changes alter who will own and maintain streets inside the new neighborhood, permit the developer to seek dimensional variances from the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) rather than being barred from requesting variance relief, and leave unresolved how far Davis Homes must construct Combs Road southward where parcels remain in county jurisdiction. Neighbors said the road and sight-distance issues affect safety and tree removal could be harmful to existing properties.

Commission action and key details
- The commission voted 9-0 to continue Commitment 1b (the scope of Combs Road reconstruction) to the March 10 meeting to allow staff and the city attorney to verify annexation legal descriptions and statutory authority. Motion to continue was made by Commissioner King and seconded by Commissioner Lexi.
- The commission voted 9-0 to modify Commitment 1e to require that internal roads be publicly dedicated and built to municipal standards. The motion was made by Commissioner Stambaugh and seconded by Commissioner Billborn.
- The commission voted 9-0 to modify Commitment 6 to permit the filing of dimensional variance petitions with the Board of Zoning Appeals and to delete the cut-and-pasted partial development standards in the original commitment; the revised language makes the development subject to the UDO. The motion was made by Commissioner Lexi and seconded by Commissioner King.

What proponents and opponents said
Scribe Bay, attorney for the petitioner, described the prior rezoning as having been prepared for a single-owner, rental project (identified in the record as PrideOne) that planned private internal roads. Bay said Davis Homes intends individual lots and an eventual homeowners association and therefore requests the streets be dedicated to the city.

Bay also proposed simplifying a set of long, pasted development snippets and replacing them with a commitment that the project comply with the UDO while allowing specific variance petitions. Bay told the commission the petitioner \"would make our best efforts to try to obtain the necessary easements to widen the road through there.\" (Scribe Bay).

Resident Jason Hiscox of 747 North Combs Road testified as a remonstrator and said he opposed sidewalks crossing his property and the removal of trees. Hiscox also urged that the commission consider lowering the road grade at a blind hill by his driveway to improve sight distance.

Staff and commission concerns
City staff indicated support for changes to the internal-roads commitment and for allowing variance requests, but staff also said the disputed Combs Road language needed clarification. Engineering staff (Mr. Peck) emphasized that sight distance on the hill near the s-curve is a public-safety issue and recommended that the road be reconstructed \"in some way, shape, or form\" to provide safe sight lines.

The commission discussed whether the city has the right-of-way authority to require reconstruction beyond the developer's property and whether annexation legal descriptions included the adjacent roadway. Commissioners agreed to continue Commitment 1b so staff can confirm whether the city's annexation and statutory authority cover the part of Combs Road in question.

Next steps
The commission left two commitment modifications approved and scheduled Commitment 1b for additional legal and engineering review; staff expects to return with clarified language by the March 10 meeting so the commission can decide whether to require reconstruction beyond the petitioner's property line or to craft an alternative condition.

Ending
All three votes recorded during the Davis Homes item carried unanimously, 9-0, with the commission directing staff to research annexation language and statutory authority before resolving the Combs Road obligation.","The Greenwood Advisory Planning Commission approved modifying two development commitments for a 32.93-acre Davis Homes subdivision and continued a third condition to allow staff to research right-of-way and annexation questions raised at a public hearing.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission continues several primary-plat items to March 24

Greenwood panel extends Redwood Apartments Phase 2 approvals

Planning commission approves two changes for Davis Homes commitments, delays third for legal review