The Maryland State Board of Education convened on July 25, 2023, to address a significant case involving the potential removal of local board member Juanita Miller. This exceptions hearing was initiated by a petition from the appellant, challenging an administrative law judge's (ALJ) previous decision that found insufficient evidence to support the removal charges against Miller.

During the hearing, attorney Brandon Cooper, representing the petitioners, argued that the ALJ's ruling was flawed due to a misinterpretation of the law. He emphasized that the ALJ incorrectly stated he was not obligated to adhere to the board's policies and procedures, which he claimed tainted the decision. Cooper presented various allegations against Miller, including claims that she acted unilaterally in executing contracts without board approval, thereby violating board bylaws and state law.

Cooper referenced multiple investigations and audits that purportedly substantiated claims of misconduct by Miller, including findings from the Maryland State Department of Education and the Office of Inspector General for Education. He argued that these reports highlighted a pattern of inappropriate behavior that warranted her removal.

In response, Miller's attorney, Bruce Marcus, defended her actions, asserting that the allegations were unfounded and that Miller had acted within her rights as a board member. He contended that the administrative law judge had thoroughly examined the evidence and concluded that Miller had performed her duties competently, despite the challenging environment within the board.

The board members engaged in a dialogue, seeking clarification on the ALJ's statements and the implications of the evidence presented. They expressed concerns about the potential ramifications of the case, particularly regarding the authority of board members and the integrity of the decision-making process.

As the hearing concluded, the board was tasked with determining whether to uphold the ALJ's recommendation or to exercise its independent judgment in the matter. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for governance within the Prince George's County Board of Education and set a precedent for future removal proceedings. The board's decision is anticipated to reflect its commitment to upholding ethical standards and ensuring accountability among its members.