On March 10, 2025, the Minnesota State Legislature introduced Senate Bill 2335, a resolution aimed at addressing the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC. The bill seeks to memorialize Congress to clarify that constitutional rights are reserved for natural persons, not artificial entities like corporations, and to assert that spending money to influence elections does not constitute free speech under the First Amendment.

The bill's proponents argue that the Supreme Court's interpretation has allowed corporations and other entities to exert disproportionate influence over the political process, undermining the democratic principle of equal participation for all citizens. They contend that this has led to a significant imbalance in political discourse, where the voices of ordinary voters are drowned out by the financial power of corporations.

Key provisions of Senate Bill 2335 include a request for Congress to propose a constitutional amendment that would explicitly define the rights of individuals versus those of corporations. The bill emphasizes the need for regulation of corporate political spending to restore public confidence in democratic institutions and processes.

Debate surrounding the bill is expected to focus on the implications of limiting corporate influence in politics. Supporters argue that it is essential for ensuring a fair electoral process, while opponents may raise concerns about the potential impact on free speech and the rights of businesses to participate in political discourse.

The introduction of Senate Bill 2335 comes at a time when discussions about campaign finance reform are gaining traction across the nation. If passed, the bill could have significant political implications, potentially setting a precedent for similar measures in other states and influencing the national conversation on campaign finance and corporate influence in politics.

As the bill moves forward, it will be referred to the Elections Committee for further consideration, where lawmakers will assess its viability and potential impact on Minnesota's electoral landscape.