[{"_1":2,"_100":-5,"_101":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6295393,"mediaKeyId","2520874-7c6eaf8c2a23ffc42f8d9d9cfa9d3d3f","parentId",2520874,"title","Board renews principal contracts and approves minutes; motions pass unanimously","audioSeconds",146,"startMs",7985000,"endMs",8131000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2520874-7c6eaf8c2a23ffc42f8d9d9cfa9d3d3f&start=7985&end=8131","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2520874-7c6eaf8c2a23ffc42f8d9d9cfa9d3d3f/thumbnail_7985000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6295393/Maine/Board-renews-principal-contracts-and-approves-minutes-motions-pass-unanimously","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6295393-fc94ea618d3974037a87c11a19dbcc46/orig.mp4?Expires=1771088029&Signature=Fn5RIZr31qxA9C0OUrwGlmrR9GECJWdNFs8zIbTLl0pYAq2B4YC5ni7DzXe-IKtM9NdBS65XVLZU88ym16oloIB16-Mer03JSoqHjRgv9558vLWVLkovbIZ6PUipdRsFY4YmIJJIsBEBUbmHqc5hX9adWw7DV1epvQu~6OuzJsFefWFZ~18pzmFQ40WHjGqqKWB6nkuUzl0NCHbE5qM2ZiCD2y-zHOl40avq9bfy3qgZP-KVmsq59d4aZyqwtSybE0NLYIMtTHerkgMrYEH8pr3x2rpDz4GtfN4a~Y-CnthRCJe6kQWK07MzOqcwQKbwqk~dERZWvn5fR2o6ZX9yZQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Portland Public Schools","date","2025-03-05T15:26:15Z","article","The board approved three personnel‑related items during the meeting: renewal of probationary principal and assistant principal contracts for the 2025–26 school year, renewal of continuing (non‑probationary) principal and assistant principal contracts, and the meeting minutes from Feb. 11, 2025 with a correction to the stated reason for an earlier executive session.

Procedural background: District staff presented the items under the personnel section; the superintendent and secretary noted the renewals are being made pursuant to M.R.S.A. Title 20‑A, Chapter 504, §13301 (employment of principals). The board considered and voted on probationary renewals first and then continuing renewals.

Votes and outcomes: The motions were made and seconded as recorded in the meeting transcript; each motion was approved on a roll‑call vote with all members and the student representatives recorded in the affirmative. The board approved the Feb. 11 meeting minutes with a friendly amendment to clarify that the earlier executive session had been held \"to consult with legal counsel,\" rather than the alternate description that had appeared in the draft minutes.

Why it matters: Renewals preserve continuity of school leadership for the coming school year and reflect the board's use of state statutory authority for principal employment. The approved minutes include the requested editorial correction about the executive‑session topic.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Portland Board of Public Education Business Meeting March 4, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Portland school board approved renewal of probationary and continuing principal/assistant‑principal contracts and approved February minutes with a correction; roll‑call votes were recorded and motions carried unanimously.","taxTitle","Portland Public Schools, School Districts, Maine","taxId",38492,"location","Maine","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6295398,"District consultants and staff present special‑education opportunity review; focus on data, IEPs and staff supports",2036,8238000,10274000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2520874-7c6eaf8c2a23ffc42f8d9d9cfa9d3d3f&start=8238&end=10274","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2520874-7c6eaf8c2a23ffc42f8d9d9cfa9d3d3f/thumbnail_8238000.jpg","/articles/6295398/Maine/District-consultants-and-staff-present-specialeducation-opportunity-review-focus-on-data-IEPs-and-staff-supports","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6295398-8e28f174761018091ca96dbeec017379/orig.mp4?Expires=1771088029&Signature=BRrPAldCAAk0GDjg8SKg11Gb4VsjtfCeUr9B6ovMqafzPEmawLD7XSxTyN9kee3BmPXYuvNGbxand7sBRn5GJRs2RJgbbZphVmgO1j2Uiab9gj24mWErNxYvjzYYxgKifLqevrVryuizmUOfxtsvhOQsbzGmMGlGHjKYAQrHLE7zKSxZAlYUq1Quh085mXGDThqQ2o~lsq2TcnmEQG2L2uncwh4Jk7dag9mUvOkJV4k6jJiPmNWf8QJJ-uqGQboIjeDIdvpK0o7~K9kNzrnE7NgBR~uGGuaLySLzms7MTrgAlEzgvlVSHSzWssl6TSF8WwDlQaDi-Z7Uo39B43MJZg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","District Management Group presented findings from a multi‑month opportunity review of Portland Public Schools’ special‑education continuum, saying the review identified uses of existing strengths and a set of prioritized changes to improve outcomes for students with disabilities.

Sarah Warren, senior executive director of strategy for the district, introduced the review and noted the district had engaged the external consultant to examine capacity, program design and family engagement. Tess Nicholson Powers of District Management Group summarized interviews, classroom observations, family meetings (held in multiple languages), staff surveys and an IEP sample audit.

Key findings: the review team reported five main opportunity areas: strengthening IEP and student‑achievement data practices; improving IEP development and documentation; increasing structured supports for students with mild‑to‑moderate disabilities in general education (scheduling, collaboration and targeted professional learning); refining specialized program implementation and management; and improving family engagement (access, consistent communication and multilingual support).

IEP documentation: the state audit reviewed 59 IEPs and the consultant group focused on four core criteria: accurate statements of present levels and needs, measurable goals, services aligned to goals and the least‑restrictive‑environment explanation. The consultants reported that many IEPs lacked consistent, clearly documented needs statements and that misidentified or under‑specified needs make downstream service alignment difficult.

Staffing and schedules: the review noted the district’s dedicated special‑education coordinator roles and community‑engagement specialists as strengths but concluded staff lack protected, structured time for collaboration and co‑planning; the consultants recommended using existing early‑release time more strategically, developing a process for staff schedules to maximize student‑facing service delivery, and expanded coaching and professional development for special educators and education technicians.

Specialized programs: DMGroup reviewed the district’s in‑district specialized programs and found clear program visions in many cases but inconsistent implementation protocols and unevenly documented staffing formulas; the consultants recommended codified program management protocols, targeted program supervision capacity and a review of feasibility for any large programmatic additions (for example, day‑treatment models that carry Medicaid and other external‑funding considerations).

Family engagement: the review flagged gaps in access for multilingual families, inconsistent communications and a perception among some parents that they must repeatedly advocate for services. Recommendations included translation and interpretation protocols for IEP meetings, a staffed pathway for family questions and an ongoing family feedback loop.

Next steps: the consultants proposed a phased implementation roadmap that starts with data and IEP quality work, targeted professional learning for ed‑techs and teachers, and program management capacity building. The board was told working groups and owners will be named in the coming weeks; the consultants and district staff emphasized sequencing to avoid overloading staff and recommended a short list of high‑impact actions for the first 6–12 months.

Board reaction and questions: board members asked for comparisons to other districts (the consultants noted Portland’s IEP rate is slightly above national averages), for clarification about the scope of a potential day‑treatment program and for the implications of technology integration (some systems such as Acuity do not currently integrate with the district’s main financial/HR platforms). The presentation closed with the district committing to set up implementation working groups and to return with concrete action steps and measures of success.","A consultant team from District Management Group briefed the board on an opportunity review of the district’s special‑education services, recommending improvements in IEP data quality, staff scheduling and professional development; the board heard next‑step timelines and proposals for working groups.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6295403,"Portland school board presents $171.7 million budget, refers plan to finance committee",6800,267000,7067000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2520874-7c6eaf8c2a23ffc42f8d9d9cfa9d3d3f&start=267&end=7067","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2520874-7c6eaf8c2a23ffc42f8d9d9cfa9d3d3f/thumbnail_267000.jpg","/articles/6295403/Maine/Portland-school-board-presents-1717-million-budget-refers-plan-to-finance-committee","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6295403-0ce2180a5f4f212a41c2860e3e657380/orig.mp4?Expires=1771088029&Signature=RVvkPGGhto2QlHN-lnxCQlXwnp03haOJKpg1ovYnAw8fFhmTL4zbxtB-VdQlEhmi8RIEvhXgsU~Z3Z22y4MvfAdobbc9zPPXGicp2nR1S80tKh-s-LKjwtCIqhSquv6KZd2RbsP29THCeWlkiAh6goRO1CSsQGnLH-i8g-s36~iJzd5M7CuPzmQnn6whqq3d~fMa8abdFU~lNNDJwpl8tz9gKopM9FW3-aGlfa26YqaGLw9DSuvlsDjUhlBojjIUTTZd1o781coBE~2Ktbae~-oGgZxrIFZhtx-w3Dv1Bc0e2jd90QH1SST6DpxQSIWg6b9NqvCWWbHHp4Y4Uoafow__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Superintendent Scallon presented Portland Public Schools’ proposed fiscal 2026 budget — a comprehensive plan of $171,700,000 that he said aligns to the district’s five‑year strategic plan and includes targeted investments in literacy, special education, multilingual learning and high‑school music programming.

The budget presentation set the tax impact up front: the superintendent said the proposal would raise the school portion of property taxes by 5.31%, or 42¢ per $1,000 of assessed value. Using the district’s median homeowner assumption of a $500,000 assessed value, Scallon said that would raise that homeowner’s school taxes by $210 a year, about $17.50 a month.

The district’s proposed spending covers three operating streams: preK–12 instruction ($160.8 million), adult education (about $5 million) and food service ($5.6 million). Scallon said the increase is driven largely by salary and benefits ($8.9 million in the budget) and a combination of priorities identified through the strategic‑plan process. He also told the board the budget assumes a 0.75% staffing vacancy rate, a 6% placeholder for health-benefit cost growth and a preliminary property valuation of $15.32 billion.

Why it matters: the proposal is the start of a multi‑step review process. The school board approves the local budget and then the city and voters take subsequent steps; the board referred the plan to its finance committee for detailed review and recommended public hearings in April ahead of an April 8 second read and vote and a June 10 public referendum date on the city calendar.

Details and priorities: Scallon said the FY26 proposal would pilot an early‑literacy education technician at Title I elementary schools (one technician per two kindergarten classes), add literacy specialists at two schools, expand district capacity for special education (roughly $400,000 in school‑based personnel plus about $1 million in department personnel), fund a contracted review of multilingual‑learner programs ($125,000) and delay the launch of the community‑school initiative to invest earlier in early‑childhood capacity in light of a 2028 state shift in responsibility for some early‑childhood special‑education services. He said the budget also proposes music staff increases at Portland and Deering high schools.

Revenue and reserves: Scallon said local property tax is the largest revenue source and the district intends to use $3.9 million of fund balance in FY26 (the budget book shows a projected fund balance drawdown and line items for one‑time costs). He noted the district’s pension bond payment ends after FY26 and that the elimination of that obligation will free about $2.67 million in future years.

Public comment: Dozens of public speakers responded during the public‑comment period. Student Representative Fitzgerald reported school‑level activities and accomplishments at Casco Bay High School. Several music staff and parents urged the board to add music teachers at Portland and Deering high schools; band director Audrey Cabral and Deering teacher Abby Hutchins detailed the number of ensembles and courses currently covered by a single teacher and urged expansion. Other speakers supported increased investment in special education and adult education, while some parents and staff described school‑level problems that they said should be addressed before asking for larger tax increases.

Board action: Chair Lentz moved to refer the superintendent’s FY26 budget to the finance committee for detailed review; the motion was seconded and carried on a roll‑call vote with all board members and the student representatives recorded in the affirmative. Chair Lentz announced the finance committee will begin review and public comment the following Monday and gave the committee a timeline of joint city/district meetings and public hearings through the April and May review period.

Next steps: The board instructed members to bring proposed additions or subtractions and suggested trade‑offs (tax increase, increase use of fund balance, staffing reductions) to the finance committee meeting for consideration. The finance committee will return a recommended amendment to the full board for action prior to the public referendum.","Superintendent Scallon outlined a $171.7 million fiscal 2026 budget Tuesday that would raise the school portion of property taxes 5.3% (42¢ per $1,000 of assessed value); the board voted unanimously to refer the proposal to the finance committee for review.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board renews principal contracts and approves minutes; motions pass unanimously

District consultants and staff present special‑education opportunity review; focus on data, IEPs and staff supports

Portland school board presents $171.7 million budget, refers plan to finance committee