A new legislative proposal, House Bill 1991, introduced in the Maine State Legislature on March 6, 2025, aims to restrict minors' access to chatbots for recreational purposes. This bill, which has sparked discussions among lawmakers and community members alike, seeks to address growing concerns about the potential risks associated with young users interacting with artificial intelligence.

The primary provision of House Bill 1991 prohibits website and application owners from allowing individuals under the age of 18 to access chatbots for non-educational uses. To enforce this, the bill mandates that service providers require proof of age before granting access. Violators of this law could face civil penalties, including damages up to $1,000, as well as the possibility of injunctive relief for those harmed by such violations.

Supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary step to protect minors from inappropriate content and interactions that could arise from unregulated chatbot use. They emphasize the importance of safeguarding young users in an increasingly digital world where technology can sometimes outpace protective measures. However, critics raise concerns about the feasibility of enforcing age verification and the potential for overreach, suggesting that such restrictions could limit beneficial educational opportunities for youth.

The implications of House Bill 1991 extend beyond mere regulation; they touch on broader societal issues regarding digital literacy and the role of technology in children's lives. Experts in child development and technology have weighed in, noting that while the intention behind the bill is commendable, it must be balanced with the need for children to engage with technology in a safe and constructive manner.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, it will likely face further scrutiny and debate. Community members are encouraged to stay informed and participate in discussions about how best to protect young users while fostering a healthy relationship with technology. The outcome of House Bill 1991 could set a precedent for how states approach the regulation of digital interactions for minors, making it a significant topic for residents to follow closely.