[{"_1":2,"_122":-5,"_123":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,98,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6291297,"mediaKeyId","2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473","parentId",2530089,"title","Senate committee debates SB250, a bill to limit local use of resources for federal immigration enforcement","audioSeconds",3035,"startMs",441000,"endMs",3476000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473&start=441&end=3476","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473/thumbnail_441000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6291297/New-Mexico/Senate-committee-debates-SB250-a-bill-to-limit-local-use-of-resources-for-federal-immigration-enforcement","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6291297-21820157da2675d936cee0dda4c28662/orig.mp4?Expires=1776552220&Signature=Qhv-klIQNKFslnGZXGxxQrtmK4Ym7EY-groNaGrUF1xTRw86DZU2sLr8zScSkCHPsVnuF7lBbuXDFEyhWELdXr8CbHgktjj4LRxChkerFA7ZEAvkq0caxVsvaJLC6b4xN~ImKVV1~hkjV2GXg~frjScYFy8Lll~DV7-S7d2ddm5GXMg9-faIBPa-7ymkcgjBUaamJNdyv-UG3CosADKxdLZI13C3qg8SODIzfXLuji3q4Zt1FyUZebF6oEkMs69kCtsEhcib9J7SGITldJ1ydxoDYrmetA6OpmzXghpiqC7IPeXSDb87wsgcXF8GQsjOH9HF7dRhf-kUXouN3hUEog__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","New Mexico Legislature","date","2025-03-05T00:00:00Z","article","Senate Bill 250, which would prohibit state and political subdivisions from using public funds, personnel, property or equipment to identify, detect, apprehend, arrest, detain or prolong the detention of a person solely because of suspected civil violations of federal immigration law, was the central, contested item in the committee's Jan. 21 hearing.

Senator Nava summarized the sponsor's intent: “Senate bill 2 50 will ensure that all local and state jurisdictions do not use local resources to aid federal agencies in the enforcement of immigration laws. Resources include, but are not limited to public funds, personnel time, and use of property and equipment.” She added the bill “will ensure that only people with criminal warrants are being detained for federal immigration purposes in local jails.”

Committee members pressed a range of questions about likely effects. Senator Gallegos asked whether the bill could “affect federal resources” and cited analyses from county and state agencies suggesting possible fiscal or operational consequences. Committee witnesses and the sponsor pointed to court rulings and legal interpretations discussed in the hearing, noting that federal attempts to compel state or local enforcement can run afoul of the anti‑commandeering principle, and that several courts have found 8 U.S.C. §1373 unconstitutional in particular circumstances. As the sponsor summarized: “Nothing in section 1 prohibits police or any other state resources to deal with criminals who have felony warrants or with persons who were suspected of criminal activity.”

Several members raised operational and fiscal concerns. Senators asked whether state police and local jails would still be able to cooperate with federal authorities on criminal investigations, human‑trafficking task forces and other joint operations; proponents repeatedly said the bill does not prevent criminal investigations or federal agents from operating in New Mexico. Committee members also cited fiscal-impact reports submitted by agencies and counties; proponents said at least one county analysis cited the wrong bill and that the committee should not conflate those figures with SB250.

Public safety and oath-of-office arguments were prominent. Senator Block asked directly whether the state or local governments would be sued or lose federal funding if the legislation became law; proponents said courts have limited the federal government's ability to withhold funds for nonparticipation in federal immigration enforcement, and that past administrations did not cut off funding in similar circumstances.

A formal motion for a due‑pass recommendation was made in committee (mover: Senator Pinto; seconder: Senator Nava and Senator Gallegos were listed as supporting a second). A roll-call occurred and several members explained their votes on the record. The transcript records named votes during roll-call (for example, Senator Block recorded “Nay”; Senator Boone recorded “No”; Senator Sergio Lopez recorded “Yes”), but the final tally and the committee's formal outcome are not explicitly stated in the segment of the transcript provided.

Committee debate documented detailed legal references and procedural clarifications but left some fiscal questions unresolved on the record. Committee members asked staff to verify statutory cross‑references and contract impacts cited in agency fiscal analyses.

The committee hearing transcript captures extended exchanges but does not contain a clear, explicit final tally or disposition for SB250 within the provided excerpt; the motion, substantive questions and roll‑call statements are recorded.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Senate - Health and Public Affairs Mar 5, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Senate Bill 250, which would limit the use of state and local resources to assist federal immigration enforcement, drew sustained debate in the Senate Health Public Affairs Committee on Jan. 21.","taxTitle","Senate, Committees, Legislative, New Mexico","taxId",29062,"location","New Mexico","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6291302,"Senate Health Public Affairs Committee advances nine funding bills on consent agenda",126,0,126000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473&start=0&end=126","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473/thumbnail_0.jpg","/articles/6291302/New-Mexico/Senate-Health-Public-Affairs-Committee-advances-nine-funding-bills-on-consent-agenda","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6291302-516bf6b98601715bf52b54939fc5bb16/orig.mp4?Expires=1776552220&Signature=nnnc8oTJ0xY~uCaRJskRogu5c8Ei-737Wt4jzsGqaivi5DLQ3w2cNwc1p6qc2~c8n4U~keTdBCCv5U4mrN1A99k0GoN2U3SwFSVbj2ekgRXyYuo7sAMgtgPgzoUMApJRmIWp-jyKThrO3B2clvUYTLHvA14Ar0zLxnA4~gfM8SuxnJ8GEd7pbM556HsPh3IhvTYa7gD2uxPadqHaKEZpOx32q6bhMuTjSM26PPRdxFdTuEr2QLF7zwkJdgLvz~heaABNmym-bb~WP67qE8TlMY17RSVqBxc96D7Xp2sF0zOxhTLOP~cxg6Jk~ygBQbyYz4YhuHyf5IkDPEV3fRyzEA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Senate Health Public Affairs Committee on Jan. 21 voted to advance a group of appropriation bills on a consent agenda, giving each a due-pass recommendation to the Senate Finance Committee.

Committee chair opened the meeting by reading the consent list and asking if any member objected. For each listed bill, with no objections raised, the committee secretary recorded a due-pass recommendation, consistently stated on the record as by a vote of 10 to 0.

Bills moved on the consent agenda included: Senate Bill 270 (Federally Qualified Health Center operations); SB 288 (increase aging network reimbursements); SB 338 (recruit and retain rural health care workers); SB 346 (statewide capital improvements); SB 365 (Commission on the Status of Women funding); SB 366 (Children's Code Reform Task Force funding); SB 395 (Special Olympics funding); SB 427 (new physician residency programs); and SB 436 (Workforce Solutions Department funding). Each was announced as receiving a due-pass recommendation, 10-0, and will be considered by the Senate Finance Committee.

Committee members did not request separate hearings on these bills during the session excerpted on the record.

The committee returned later in the hearing to consider other, more contested bills.","The Senate Health Public Affairs Committee gave due-pass recommendations to nine appropriation bills on a consent agenda, with unanimous committee support, forwarding them to the Senate Finance Committee.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":80,"_43":91,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6291283,"Committee advances bill to create Office of Housing, Planning and Production amid debate over roles and data mapping",8253000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473&start=8253&end=8253","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473/thumbnail_8253000.jpg","/articles/6291283/New-Mexico/Committee-advances-bill-to-create-Office-of-Housing-Planning-and-Production-amid-debate-over-roles-and-data-mapping","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6291283-52bf3a63a19e3c6e6d5633d6a81ccea5/orig.mp4?Expires=1776552220&Signature=ZpL1upIsBMpHIGlxcDnRKRosRjDTKzJ88tAwE936DVg4JScUhvozOhqWe40T83ub1qjH1Jj-W6iuhNvXWjLre3P2Yc4sqlVNRjq4dwCYKhnaPK05sdPi2eP5pjqmLERJDIEL47X0Us3jFpjFdV3OKUhKYOn3tRBImmO8Z-PKSBMfK~RiTlAgqGJaZnYDZSyh-vHUQgZzlsa7CnbdWdsGxj~622UOk~2HNLDNNBHDHSpgoJE60HK6wTe05bcLm~U5SbgAKGuf8HzoALc4udbbxTicsvPcj1J3BzRj38uTfx~4UXpyADRaqQrbR8gUVpcfsxjoBWpk8A3mc45HunwBpA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senate Bill 205 proposes creating an Office of Housing, Planning and Production, administratively attached to the Department of Finance and Administration and aligned with the governor's office, to coordinate statewide housing strategy and reduce housing costs.

Senator Padilla, a sponsor, told the committee the state faces a large shortfall in housing units (which he described as a roughly 42,000‑unit gap now and projected to grow to as much as 85,000 over a decade if unaddressed). He said the office would develop a statewide strategy, provide technical assistance to local governments, align resources across agencies, collect and report housing and land‑use data, and identify regulatory barriers that drive construction costs.

Administration witnesses, including Daniel Werweth and Taylor Cook, described the office as a coordination mechanism that would “make the state's dollars go further,” provide technical support to rural communities, and examine regulatory and permitting reforms that can lower housing costs. Local officials and housing stakeholders — including representatives of Bernalillo County, Las Cruces, the New Mexico Home Builders Association and Homewise — testified in support and urged the state to streamline permitting and regulatory frameworks.

Committee members pressed sponsors on duplication, data and measurable goals. Senator Block asked how many state agencies currently address housing issues; sponsors said they had identified many agencies and were still mapping them (the testimony referenced roughly 17 agencies engaged in housing activities, though sponsors said mapping was ongoing). Block and others requested more specificity on measurable statewide goals and how the new office would avoid duplicating existing programs.

The committee recorded a due‑pass recommendation on SB205. The transcript records a roll call and a stated outcome phrased as “7 to 3,” which the chair announced as the committee result in the provided excerpt.","Senate Bill 205 would establish an Office of Housing, Planning and Production to coordinate housing strategy, data, and regulatory reforms across state government. Sponsors argue the office is needed to address a projected shortage of dwelling units and rising rents; some senators urged clearer mapping of existing programs and measurable goals.",{"_33":99,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":100,"_41":101,"_43":102,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6291288,"Committee backs task force to study foster‑care recruitment, retention and alternatives after reports of children sleeping in state offices",1219,6987000,8206000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473&start=6987&end=8206","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473/thumbnail_6987000.jpg","/articles/6291288/New-Mexico/Committee-backs-task-force-to-study-fostercare-recruitment-retention-and-alternatives-after-reports-of-children-sleeping-in-state-offices","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6291288-6916076612939de6d21c6a1e63637a06/orig.mp4?Expires=1776552220&Signature=Vw4zhYSo7Ox3IIwAbdifCnBIHxzj6wTp12DUiw4JpNeo6nTxOT~p8ve-y7DniPqLpoT5dmqSmEYu4CyM0iYQHvwAx956Y48Dlw68soSOifgZZzoB1acNVlTaABFK8jgWaZz40NPuN0sD8OhtF8okmbGnlQJmNGoest8Vf360A3YrJMFNO31FYIpbdstQjakIayREKj8hQ4jBJetgTdXcCjzBPHwQBR8wC~oNy8VZ7hrg~aOjnOQkdmduYTNU8FLE7BQ1xvtyCBZgrS-Ez-No4pDW3EXoCMxkBhv37azRflAN88btFI6mozxO1VanG1zubTB9t-0TsoOFcBcHSXNiSQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senate Bill 305 (committee substitute) would create a task force to examine foster‑parent recruitment and retention, explore alternative models such as county‑run systems and nonprofit partnerships, and recommend actions to reduce the number of children sleeping in state offices, according to sponsor testimony during the Jan. 21 committee hearing.

Senator Biosyn (sponsor) said the bill was driven by reports that at least 41 children for whom the Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD) is legal guardian were “on the run or missing” and by accounts of children forced to sleep in state offices. She described the situation as “untenable,” cited the Kevin S. settlement the state reached in 2020, and said reforms promised under that settlement remain incomplete.

Marilyn Beck, founder of New Mexico Child First Network, testified in support and described models used in other states—particularly Utah—where statutory, nonprofit and county innovations had reduced or eliminated the practice of children sleeping in offices. Beck said the panel could examine county‑run systems and nonprofit partnerships that recruit and train foster parents.

Committee members asked about task‑force membership, reporting and funding. The committee substitute added members requested by stakeholders, including a tribal member with lived experience and representation for kinship caregivers and LGBTQ+ community members; it also specifies reporting to CYFD and the Legislative Finance Committee. The sponsor noted existing FY25 funds ($1.25 million in prior appropriation) devoted to foster‑parent recruitment and retention and said a separate appropriation had been removed from the substitute.

Senators discussed whether the task force should be statutory or a memorial, and the chair advised sponsors they could convert the measure into a memorial later if they preferred statutory removal of an appropriation. A motion for a due‑pass recommendation carried; the transcript records a committee vote of 9 to 0 on the committee substitute.

Supporters argued the task force would allow evidence‑based review, bring in institutions of higher education for research, and examine innovative models to keep children out of state offices and stabilize placements.","Committee substitute for Senate Bill 305 would create a task force to study and recommend reforms to foster‑care recruitment and retention. Sponsors said the panel aims to get children out of state offices and improve supports for foster families; the committee gave the measure a due‑pass recommendation.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":113,"_43":114,"_45":115,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6291292,"Committee advances bill to reduce prior‑authorization barriers for rare‑disease treatments",3435,3518000,6953000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473&start=3518&end=6953","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2530089-14052ca6770419c10f6e8a9e346c2473/thumbnail_3518000.jpg","/articles/6291292/New-Mexico/Committee-advances-bill-to-reduce-priorauthorization-barriers-for-raredisease-treatments","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6291292-196d50942a3eb32b76c28baf8442eb17/orig.mp4?Expires=1776552220&Signature=KoJjngtzOhPtQMcvgCFqHNiCSiW18losvtcbhgENqQBsHbjaLRJAHC1-Xeo6OcAGdHRJh4P6C8i3QxKopBEcKqYBqbuDXUBV3h9dglqu7BANGf~9ex0T1wNRtAIk-EB4uStMnnzmg-y~ad5jyOorCMcWiIIHoG-DqerRg1usNNwDZkX7yyiwE9-5-L4nM8m~jRVFFB2MnbR~kQ4-Gpqqsqr17d5R7Dr1yNqwdmetG7eadDmcZJB~szXy26PQrGC1PXmqNJXJzYnwl-0OrTf5m6ckl4NhdcqN5NPK4YXgfjmw84yEjxkI1lOgJx~OPgxaK6l7g9OhiFe2xP5i3rL2Gw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senate Bill 39, presented as a governor-sponsored bill, would limit prior‑authorization barriers for people with rare diseases who need on‑label or off‑label uses of FDA‑approved medications in the commercial insurance market. The sponsor characterized rare diseases as those affecting fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S., citing definitions used by federal agencies.

Sponsor remarks and a patient witness framed the bill around delayed access to treatment. Debbie Armstrong, who testified as a patient and representative of the governor's office, described being denied immunoglobulin therapy multiple times for a rare necrotizing myopathy and said delays caused significant functional decline. Armstrong said she was denied three times and that “by the time I managed to fight the referral denials and get approval for treatment, I was almost completely dependent.”

The Office of the Superintendent of Insurance (OSI) testified in support, noting that “eliminating prior authorization for off‑label use of FDA‑approved medication removes unnecessary barriers” and urging committee approval. A representative of the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PBM trade group) expressed concerns about patient safety, fiscal impact and implementation and said they were continuing to work with sponsors on amendments.

Senators clarified that SB39 applies to the commercial market (subject to OSI jurisdiction) and does not change Medicaid or Medicare coverage processes. Committee members also noted existing appeals and peer‑review procedures at OSI that would remain available when insurers initially deny coverage.

The committee voted; the transcript records a roll call and reports the outcome as a due‑pass recommendation by a vote of 9 to 0.","Senate Bill 39, a governor-sponsored measure to remove prior authorization requirements for certain on‑label and off‑label uses of FDA‑approved drugs treating rare diseases in the commercial market, received a unanimous due‑pass recommendation from the committee.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Senate committee debates SB250, a bill to limit local use of resources for federal immigration enforcement

Senate Health Public Affairs Committee advances nine funding bills on consent agenda

Committee advances bill to create Office of Housing, Planning and Production amid debate over roles and data mapping

Committee backs task force to study foster‑care recruitment, retention and alternatives after reports of children sleeping in state offices

Committee advances bill to reduce prior‑authorization barriers for rare‑disease treatments