Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Representative Schultz advocates for June primary to enhance voter engagement

February 25, 2024 | Election Law, House of Representatives, Committees , Legislative, New Hampshire



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Representative Schultz advocates for June primary to enhance voter engagement
During a recent meeting of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, discussions centered on the pressing need to move the state’s primary election date, with a strong push for a June timeframe. Representative Chris Schultz, a Concord state representative, emphasized the importance of this change, arguing that the current primary schedule serves as an "incumbent protection plan," limiting the time candidates have to connect with voters before the general election.

Schultz, drawing from his extensive experience in various states, highlighted that the average time between the primary and general elections is insufficient for candidates to recover from contentious primaries. He noted that a mere 58 days is not enough for candidates to pivot their messaging and engage with a broader electorate, particularly when many voters do not participate in primaries. Schultz proposed that moving the primary to June would allow for a more effective campaign period, giving candidates the opportunity to communicate their messages to general election voters before summer vacations begin.

The committee also heard from Chairman Berry, who echoed Schultz's sentiments, stating that the current primary system disadvantages challengers and favors incumbents. He pointed out that the existing timeline creates a significant hurdle for candidates, particularly those facing contested primaries, as they struggle to gain traction and funding in a compressed timeframe.

Both representatives stressed the need for a collaborative approach to determine the best date for the primary, suggesting a ranked-choice voting method to explore various options. They argued that an earlier primary would not only enhance the democratic process but also ensure that voters receive adequate information about all candidates, thereby fostering a more informed electorate.

As the committee continues to deliberate on this issue, the proposed shift to a June primary date remains a focal point, with advocates believing it could lead to a more equitable and engaging electoral process for New Hampshire voters.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI