Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Missouri House Bill 952 reformulates tort liability payment evidence rules

March 05, 2025 | House Introduced Bills, House Bills, 2025 Bills, Missouri Legislation Bills, Missouri


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Missouri House Bill 952 reformulates tort liability payment evidence rules
A new legislative proposal, House Bill 952, introduced by Representative Overcast, aims to reshape the landscape of tort liability payments in Missouri. The bill, presented on March 5, 2025, seeks to amend existing laws regarding how payments for special damages are handled in personal injury cases, potentially impacting both plaintiffs and defendants in the state.

At its core, House Bill 952 proposes to repeal and replace section 490.715 of Missouri's Revised Statutes. The key provision of the bill stipulates that if a defendant or their insurer pays any part of a plaintiff's special damages before a trial, that amount cannot be claimed again by the plaintiff from the same defendant. This means that if a defendant reimburses a plaintiff's insurer for damages or deductible costs, the plaintiff cannot seek further compensation for those same damages in court.

The bill addresses concerns about "double recovery," where a plaintiff might receive compensation from both the defendant and their own insurance for the same damages. By clarifying the rules around these payments, the legislation aims to streamline the legal process and reduce the potential for conflicting claims.

However, the bill has sparked notable debate among lawmakers and legal experts. Proponents argue that it will create a fairer system by preventing plaintiffs from receiving more than what they are entitled to, thus protecting defendants from excessive liability. Critics, on the other hand, express concerns that it may disadvantage plaintiffs, particularly those who rely on insurance payouts to cover immediate medical expenses while awaiting trial.

The implications of House Bill 952 extend beyond legal technicalities; they touch on broader economic and social issues. If passed, the bill could lead to lower insurance premiums for defendants, as insurers may face reduced payouts. Conversely, plaintiffs may find themselves in a more precarious position, potentially facing higher out-of-pocket costs if their claims are limited.

As the bill moves through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain. Legal experts suggest that further amendments may be necessary to balance the interests of both plaintiffs and defendants. The ongoing discussions surrounding House Bill 952 highlight the complexities of tort reform and its direct impact on Missouri residents, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of how such changes will affect access to justice and financial recovery for those injured.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Missouri articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI