[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6646764,"mediaKeyId","2528210-5fb25d2db28ec80d21e9ca36c9d55b9b","parentId",2528210,"title","Council reappoints Joel Fine and Ian Scofield to Mountain Regional Water board after remote interviews","audioSeconds",1500,"startMs",1680000,"endMs",3180000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2528210-5fb25d2db28ec80d21e9ca36c9d55b9b&start=1680&end=3180","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2528210-5fb25d2db28ec80d21e9ca36c9d55b9b/thumbnail_1680000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6646764/Utah/Council-reappoints-Joel-Fine-and-Ian-Scofield-to-Mountain-Regional-Water-board-after-remote-interviews","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6646764-6fc5969ab72653f92eb8fb7a3e8f3a15/orig.mp4?Expires=1771027176&Signature=nVbNfyErnjf72A-d~3KEvZBqf45EcPZwcCq9rB8BGp5dnwwdGw1ht5wXe2F6ahZDL2LMaYYiEnrhyPX3Gk9ZPFonHwULcFxtLW--fYtFnglyiNncF780-VV3AXMuugGKdeUejCw3DWmyUnzqwFB-vcTEK7f85JZl60XwPwKG0O67V1oS~Mk2t~udKgZpjo1xjTJS04Ndt9R-fXH86OC4yE9Yw9ZZxJFUmZg5M~QKG7zQAMY6hZWaoFx7ugOk~vuwTsSmsTGWEF-OIWH7o--VU4SaSidSvzcIcKTJEDSesab~9HXMSX9vtETlONFsG32QrgS3gusJNe~c08zs-8BcuQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Summit County County Council","date","2025-02-19T16:37:00Z","article","Summit County Council voted Feb. 19 to reappoint Joel Fine and Ian Scofield to the Mountain Regional Water Special Service District administrative control board following remote interviews with both applicants.

Both applicants told the council they sought another term to continue work on long-term infrastructure and planning. Joel Fine said he tries to focus on the \"big picture\" of the district and urged attention to aging pipes and system-wide repairs. \"Some parts are a freaking mess,\" Fine said during his interview, adding that he supports pursuing growth through acquisition or consolidation where feasible.

Ian Scofield, a hydrogeologist who said this would be his third term, described operational priorities that include a new centralized facility, optimizing water-treatment systems and anticipating climatic changes that could shift the balance from surface-water runoff toward more groundwater reliance. \"We're in the middle of processes on [treatment] ... and we should look at how to get the most out of the Signal Hill Water Treatment Plant,\" Scofield said. He also urged attention to facility storage for vehicles and equipment to extend asset longevity.

Council members thanked both applicants for their service. Candace (first name only in the record) thanked Fine for his time on both the planning commission and the water board; Megan (first name only) repeated appreciation for Fine and for Scofield's technical background.

The council made the reappointments by motion later in the meeting. The motion to reappoint Joel Fine and Ian Scofield passed on a voice vote and was recorded as approved.

Why it matters: Mountain Regional Water operates infrastructure that serves residents and businesses across Summit County; council and board members said the district faces capital needs for piping replacement, facility consolidation and water-treatment optimization amid changing climatic conditions. Applicants identified growth, system repairs and improved facilities as near-term priorities.

What happens next: Staff said the council would notify the applicants of the decision later that afternoon.

Notes: Quotations and interview summaries are taken directly from the Feb. 19 council meeting transcript.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Summit County County Council - County Council - Feb 19, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Summit County Council reappointed two incumbents to the Mountain Regional Water Special Service District administrative control board after interviewing both applicants, who emphasized infrastructure replacement, growth strategies and climate-driven shifts toward groundwater.","taxTitle","Summit County Council, Summit County Commission and Boards, Summit County, Utah","taxId",75367,"location","Utah","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6646768,"Summit County officials raise concerns about HB356 districting provisions that would force district-based council seats",1920,3600000,5520000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2528210-5fb25d2db28ec80d21e9ca36c9d55b9b&start=3600&end=5520","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2528210-5fb25d2db28ec80d21e9ca36c9d55b9b/thumbnail_3600000.jpg","/articles/6646768/Utah/Summit-County-officials-raise-concerns-about-HB356-districting-provisions-that-would-force-district-based-council-seats","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6646768-a54412e8c51c278f302eac014d56aa9a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771027176&Signature=nr5~bRpr6G-aG7sxiSItdj4FyXM66IlsXjjaCJK~F2DkiDz5mHupOLT999Kdd4RGnN9gh6aIdtb1RsQxj5uwbVBksrFqwx2zjhrnFxS49G7NLZdwfCthOfN374wLKE7tbvQuDGTx6-GP8kIwIJeKOP4~Klyh3FjlOb7s~GFGmTy62Lu~QcIxvzgwzL-hs8Q4pW7yKaFxqJGGHPqufMT8wdNv-gQdTl5yx69EG0vVrofA~AHbrOU5uBZn7nS-8q4UpPTyEO7QS5HpmWgbVIB4scmTmah7bgDdLmO7Kf3eb~uL1rpJxMEAMPLkK6DB3Htzuj-BkvNRA2Hq~u87d2oQ5g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Summit County officials warned Feb. 19 that a proposed state bill, HB356, would force council-manager counties to move to district-based council seats and could reduce representation for the county's eastern communities.

County staff member Jana, presenting the legislative update to the Summit County Council, said HB356 would require third- through sixth-class counties that use a council-manager form of government to ensure at least 65% of council members represent single-member districts. The bill also would require counties to form a districting commission by June 1, draft district maps using the most recent census, and present a proposed map to the county council by Aug. 1 for approval. Under the timeline Jana outlined, district-based elections would begin in November 2026 with newly staggered terms starting Jan. 1, 2027; she said current council terms would end Dec. 31, 2026 to effect the change.

“By June 1 of this year the county would need to establish a county districting commission,” Jana told the council. She said the commission would include a mayoral representative from each municipality and one resident from the unincorporated county appointed by the council, and that the map must meet standard legal requirements for population deviation, contiguity and compactness.

Eve Furze, Summit County clerk, told the council the change would increase 2026 ballot activity and election administration work. “It would increase the size of our election for 2026,” Furze said, noting that adding multiple county races could require reprecincting and more ballot processing.

Council members pressed staff and one another about the bill's likely effect on local representation. Council member Roger (first name only in the record) and others argued that fewer, larger districts risk concentrating voting power on the West Side and could make it harder for the East Side to elect a representative. “If we had 3 districts ... it really hurts the East Side voice,” Roger said during the discussion. Several council members said, if the county has any input, they would ask for more districts rather than fewer to preserve geographic balance.

The bill drew questions about who would sit on the districting commission. Furze said the commission makeup as described in the draft—mayors from municipalities plus a single representative from the unincorporated area—felt imbalanced to residents of the unincorporated county. “I'd like a little more representation than that on the commission,” Furze said.

Jana said the bill was heard that morning in the House Political Subdivisions Committee and passed favorably; she and other county staff said they would discuss the measure at the Utah Association of Counties (UAC) meeting the following day and continue communicating with legislative sponsors and the League of Cities and Towns about amendments.

The legislative briefing covered several other bills that county staff and the council said could affect Summit County's budget and operations, including:

- HB241/HB249 (energy-related bills): Staff said changes under negotiation would make some energy zone provisions voluntary and preserve local authority over tax-increment agreements; county staff were working with UAC and economic-development partners to draft amendments.

- HB332 (voter-registration database): Furze said the substitute that passed the House would remove the state's participation in the ERIC database and add new, time-consuming requirements for follow-up when mailed ballots are returned undeliverable.

- HB512 (judicial retention ballot language): Staff warned that mandated additional language on judicial-retention lines could require a two-card ballot in some elections, increasing printing, handling and verification costs.

- TRT (transient room tax) changes: Staff summarized a substitute that would add a statewide 1% TRT, carve 25% into a grant program and expand eligible uses for certain counties; Summit County staff said the county would not automatically qualify for some grants unless it raised its local rate to the new maximum.

- Property-tax / truth-in-taxation proposals (including HB511 and HB428): Staff said several bills could alter how new growth revenue is calculated and could complicate the county's budgeting process.

- HB368 (land-use task force) and HB337 (land-use / HTRZ language): Jana and council members said the county has sought a stronger role on the state land-use task force and flagged proposed deadlines for identical-floor-plan reviews and other provisions that could limit local land-use discretion.

County staff said they would continue to track the bills and seek clarifying amendments. Jana and other staff urged the council that the county's immediate priorities would be pushing for language changes that preserve at-large representation or increase the number of districts to protect East Side representation, and for clearer rules on how the districting commission would be constituted and how its maps would be adopted.

Staff said they would raise HB356 at the Utah Association of Counties meeting the following day and continue to coordinate with the League of Cities and Towns, county attorneys and local mayors.

Notes: The account above summarizes remarks and exchanges that occurred during the Feb. 19 legislative update. Quotations and procedural details come from the council's meeting transcript of that item.","County staff and council members spent more than an hour on a legislative briefing focused on HB356, a bill that would require many council-manager counties to shift to district-based seats. Officials warned the proposal could diminish representation for Summit County's East Side and requires a rapid timeline for drawing districts.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council reappoints Joel Fine and Ian Scofield to Mountain Regional Water board after remote interviews

Summit County officials raise concerns about HB356 districting provisions that would force district-based council seats