[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6643303,"mediaKeyId","2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08","parentId",2532507,"title","Sedona council pauses mechanical upgrades at ranger station; commission discusses fans and floor sealing","audioSeconds",481,"startMs",5091000,"endMs",5572000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08&start=5091&end=5572","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08/thumbnail_5091000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6643303/Sedona/Yavapai-County/Arizona/Sedona-council-pauses-mechanical-upgrades-at-ranger-station-commission-discusses-fans-and-floor-sealing","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6643303-a739e956fab3554531cd5ad52183a770/orig.mp4?Expires=1774961885&Signature=OZDOFnxftsHI~09R3imgpp2OtbvtpZ5nCl0y3tSnPuTxSgstS2VO8X3C0ZFLhZCq8Q--Qvs0CGRUDbA7j3Ike-9BDzNj38DOJm6d9wnW2wrQJ4F5EhROve34iK2farjLF~k7sjQEwo8koDdoFH8CwLTUZK3nDuicKqyaAxUz5sloeIu0naY1BVdMefUKwd0Bb9Hq5OQLWVcL4tQzCEf9WaNpCDJWWbkisC-NfmlUZ1-B4KItBec7QVl1ZBGAJvMpYEIDZkFfnTY~Hl33mBXw7ZTNF8YW88d8Ss9eD4PwADMCv0qq3c7wA3~WfuK6~A-M62X2V5kh8FHFKtJhskDGdQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Sedona","date","2025-03-10T00:00:00Z","article","The Sedona Historic Preservation Commission discussed City Council direction on the Ranger Station park at its March 10 meeting, where the council indicated it would delay installation of mechanical heating and cooling in the historic barn and first assess usage and needs.

Staff recapped the council discussion: installing full HVAC would trigger more stringent energy-code compliance and likely require interior insulation or finishes that could alter the barn’s historic appearance. Because of those trade-offs, the council’s direction was to hold off on mechanical systems for now and observe how the space is used in coming months.

Staff noted alternative, less invasive measures such as installing large ceiling fans to circulate air and polishing or sealing the barn floor to improve accessibility and maintenance. “Polishing the floor is an excellent idea to comply with ADA,” a staff member told the commission, and commissioners discussed sealer choices to balance durability with the barn’s character.

Commissioners expressed support for a cautious, iterative approach: improve usability with reversible measures such as fans and a sealed floor, track seasonal use and event demand, and revisit mechanical systems only if ongoing use demonstrates the need and if solutions can avoid permanent character changes.

Staff said public-works and parks staff will collect usage data and evaluate whether further changes are warranted; no final construction decision was made at the meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Sedona - Historic Preservation - Mar 10, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Council direction favored delaying installation of HVAC in the ranger station barn and assessing usage before committing; commissioners supported polishing and sealing the floor and adding fans to improve usability without altering historic character.","taxTitle","Sedona, Yavapai County, Arizona","taxId",54295,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6643306,"Sedona commission compiles candidates for landmarking; owners and commissioners show interest in mid-century and adobe properties",1565,3121000,4686000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08&start=3121&end=4686","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08/thumbnail_3121000.jpg","/articles/6643306/Sedona/Yavapai-County/Arizona/Sedona-commission-compiles-candidates-for-landmarking-owners-and-commissioners-show-interest-in-mid-century-and-adobe-properties","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6643306-26fb989c0324954d825cf28e2ffb7ea7/orig.mp4?Expires=1774961885&Signature=W5DyJTU0MBg4ciPRqtVNFRcCBpFFHcBIAxY4x2cg2rNvHvbJ6W0n~U28UfUeWUzBFuS9GcISSptE0EcSdtuMRb2X~7bFyMVJq0Dhe3hMFleEegcVTvXclPYs9yErcTzzbccPOthiNchoGkq4ZxqQe~uKhrmRhP78Nps0WnW10-q6HKqePN7dJ2kpRw2bRIyBV5EpEJ7DUt0AVdn6Neqnz2Ou3RSesvZN9b3HZ67HSc8FjO77J29LA5r5aSv3ZI9knYfEAQ8Nm62OiuUaE3jDN9D4KXjk-Kq7Y~P9wFJ9Wmmp3ZlYu7lCkDPP77iSny8yTztO97ur7qBFCv87Dtj02Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Sedona Historic Preservation Commission on March 10 discussed prioritizing properties for possible landmark designation, hearing a list of candidate sites from commissioners and staff and agreeing to follow up with property owners.

Commissioner Feeney presented a list drawn from an archive of her father’s architectural projects, highlighting several homes and a mid-century modern residence whose owner signaled interest in nomination. Feeney said she had contacted the property owner and that the owner, identified in the meeting as Tom Albright, “said fine” when asked about the possibility of recognition.

Commissioners and staff discussed other potential candidates: an adobe house that may date to the 1960s, commercial buildings in Uptown (including the building that houses a local restaurant), the local Elks Lodge, and other architecturally notable homes. Several commissioners suggested focusing on commercial or more publicly accessible sites to maximize public benefit and reduce neighborhood friction; staff noted owner permission remains a key step for residential nominations.

Staff said a fillable survey form exists and will be shared with commissioners to streamline preliminary documentation. Commissioners discussed options for who conducts initial surveys—commission volunteers, staff-led site visits or consultant hires—depending on time and budget. The commission also discussed timing relative to the city’s budget cycle and noted that some survey funds are being considered in the FY26 budget process.

No formal landmark nominations were made. Commissioners agreed to continue outreach, to circulate the fillable survey form, and to schedule preliminary site reviews in coordination with property owners.","Commissioners reviewed a roster of potential landmark properties—including Don Woods-era homes, a mid-century modern in Broken Arrow and an adobe structure—and discussed outreach to owners and use of a fillable survey form to advance nominations.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6643308,"Commissioners plan updated survey of Bridal Rigby House after rezoning pause",432,2527000,2959000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08&start=2527&end=2959","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08/thumbnail_2527000.jpg","/articles/6643308/Sedona/Yavapai-County/Arizona/Commissioners-plan-updated-survey-of-Bridal-Rigby-House-after-rezoning-pause","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6643308-ed1edf379ccb90aff528c1f8c16ca1db/orig.mp4?Expires=1774961885&Signature=m46eXCTVc76GCidAZFApOSZEBeIb7MwzDqSD9ADrOG9DV5n3rZz3Wxfq-T~Te7-FUwRvMfMMQiPm4i0k2cqFwE3L5~Nm4pBx4FtNrZyBQs-Xly9RFoR1OsiI3mXz5hFKqIc9tDhncVNW6ztXmF1ahXpBsecp3YVBsiUOjaEbtYe5sI2M33xbizERZtkUFB9wAHMXLJmVtdU-piI0eJ1jCwOPq0e34wWGUKgPRiAnhJpLMpf6PwiOvdIPzSHJvxs7fab2a7umB~X5Fz5NsluINdqmGmlk4mFMOvNGWHCwOvj9Soh9~yHRmn2WIbXJC3LJywKxmvL4ziMrmfQUD3T55w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners discussed the Bridal Rigby House and the prospect of a new survey on March 10 after staff said a rezoning applicant had paused the process while reviewing staff comments.

Donna, the staff liaison, told the commission that corrections and comments were returned to the property owner and that the rezoning effort had “slowed” while those comments are addressed. She said the city did not expect rezoning to move quickly in the near term.

Commissioners said they planned to re-survey the property once access and owner permission are secured. Commissioner Feeney and another commissioner said they intend to perform a site check about a week after local storms, noting that the 2014 survey found the house “not necessarily in shape to be landmarked.” Staff said the updated information would determine whether landmark nomination is appropriate.

Commissioners and staff emphasized that a property owner’s permission is required for interior access: “If they’re not home, I can’t go inside, but I can surely walk around,” a commissioner said during the discussion. Staff advised that a preliminary commissioner-led inspection can be followed by a consultant-led, full survey if the commission decides to pursue a landmark nomination.

The commission also said a more complete survey is useful as a standalone record even if a rezoning application does not move forward.","Sedona commissioners said staff comments slowed a private rezoning proposal for the Bridal Rigby property; commissioners plan to revisit the property with the owner’s permission and update a prior 2014 survey.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6643309,"Sedona Historic Preservation Commission adopts 2025–26 work plan",149,2311000,2460000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08&start=2311&end=2460","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08/thumbnail_2311000.jpg","/articles/6643309/Sedona/Yavapai-County/Arizona/Sedona-Historic-Preservation-Commission-adopts-202526-work-plan","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6643309-578400506f73748213f32d511af7abd2/orig.mp4?Expires=1774961885&Signature=WKgypa9R49SUlUQB0wJWRv88uYpd88~o3PUXROwLLCdM1OLgi3Ih--YXropVoMQUsi0yoTMA3BhjVC5CLZeJGr~7cWaIEDq96k1~XiEb8~19Zz2PydHlZeFTSHSW~Pee0cAG~i-43LSN30rEJovon-rdmD4LS6hQRToUdE~F3etGFcRMykBVoR6MGqd2xtA7Nl5R1qdCvKOsFR~kRZjLC71zLhYlpBDatqC~rlBgdNfk5-CZW8FlS0Y4V8Xr7w4erjCbw7k3R~z7XlxdTGfTGpU1qVwqx6eO74AfHqu5q5efvrMGfl9GQzSq49W1rugwEWNnlYQQZQcqQ4A9HslgQg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The City of Sedona’s Historic Preservation Commission voted to approve its 2025–2026 work plan during the March 10 meeting, formalizing a timetable that aligns the commission’s projects with the city’s fiscal year.

Commissioners approved the plan after discussion about minor clarifications. The plan was revised to reflect the July-to-June fiscal cycle and to add surveying and funding-seeking activities to the commission’s priorities.

Commissioner Feeney moved to adopt the plan, and a second was recorded. Chair Nate Myers called the voice vote; all present answered in the affirmative and the motion carried.

Commissioners said the update codifies work the commission has already been pursuing—landmark nominations, survey updates, district studies and continuing commissioner training—and gives staff a clearer set of tasks for the coming fiscal cycle. The commission also discussed potential grant support from the Certified Local Government (CLG) program and the possibility of arranging on-site training with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).

The motion to adopt the plan was made during the meeting’s regular business item on the work plan; no public comment was offered during the brief public forum for that item.

Commissioners noted that the city’s fiscal year ends June 30 and that some budgeted funds for landmark surveys are already in the 2026 budget process. Staff said it will present the commission’s budget requests to City Council as part of the budget cycle.","The Sedona Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously to adopt its 2025–2026 work plan, aligning its schedule to the city's fiscal year and explicitly adding surveying work to the plan.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6643310,"Sedona commissioners receive refresher on open meetings and conflict-of-interest rules",1798,298000,2096000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08&start=298&end=2096","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2532507-b7f8346f90fe4e53727765180d9f4a08/thumbnail_298000.jpg","/articles/6643310/Sedona/Yavapai-County/Arizona/Sedona-commissioners-receive-refresher-on-open-meetings-and-conflict-of-interest-rules","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6643310-9a2b5de890cb913e5371cc5b19467c6b/orig.mp4?Expires=1774961885&Signature=ZL0oe46m2e4fBhx9kOC5GlCuTcwBcKz-uuI7Ct92LNMzcQQLwI1nv3i82Fa1YeOkbn6ntFMyP57cxVT73CObX~4UI~IwuW~IGQqhL6taIlTJjIbl1jjTSDPhfd7bJp4g2lL25aRyMgXJ9Zi9pOvpduVIZySwaY6Nc84ikbXobu9d2RDale8hRSTvOS0DlMrex0B8sN4LGaxnP2ZNvaUNADTKx6quA4zOwgSkPEygoGR2Ho7OSodkEi8lj4uXBbI7VZTElFV3FIi~SWec3yrqDCOX7ZsTzrY~RsfVrRML6BD1H-QKIxoU2Jl5CxLXtHa3f0WsEIIkBunY7ihPUyL5oQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Kurt Christiansen, a legal advisor to Sedona’s boards, told the Historic Preservation Commission on March 10 that Arizona’s open meeting and conflict-of-interest rules require care when commissioners discuss agenda items outside public meetings.

Christiansen said the state’s public-meeting law requires meetings of public bodies to be open and that “all legal action of public bodies shall occur during a public meeting.” He told commissioners the law is to be construed in favor of openness where there is doubt.

The presentation summarized several persistent compliance issues for small commissions: quorum rules, the danger of “hub-and-spoke” communications, using staff as a conduit for views expressed outside a public meeting, and when an abstention is allowed. Christiansen emphasized that an abstention on an agenda item is generally permitted only when a commissioner has an actual conflict of interest.

“Any time anyone wants to abstain from something through, in your case, through a conflict of interest, then you’re just supposed to announce it ahead of time and then not participate at all in the discussion,” Christiansen said. He described typical recusal practice—step off the dais, take a seat in the audience and do not try to influence other commissioners.

Christiansen also reviewed the hierarchy of law that governs the commission’s duties—constitutional law, state statutes, local code and the commission’s operating rules—and urged commissioners to consult the city attorney’s office when in doubt. He noted the state civil penalty for open-meeting violations and explained that intentional conflict-of-interest violations can have criminal consequences under Arizona law.

Commissioners asked practical questions about site visits, small work groups and what to do when several members attend the same conference. Christiansen said a work group of three members would constitute a quorum and must be announced; smaller site-visit teams of two members can meet informally but should avoid deliberations that would affect a later formal action. He also advised that if a quorum of commissioners will attend an outside event, the commission should post a notice that a quorum is anticipated and indicate that no legal action is expected.

Chair Nate Myers and staff liaison Donna (last name not specified in the record) confirmed that the city’s recording and minute procedures satisfy the open meeting statutory requirements and reminded commissioners that the city attorney’s office will provide written opinions on conflicts when requested.

The training concluded with a reminder that the commission’s handbook and the Land Development Code set out the commission’s substantive duties—historic landmark designation, district designation, economic hardship review and certificates of appropriateness or no effect—and that the handbook may need periodic updates.","Attorney Kurt Christiansen reviewed Arizona open meeting law, when commissioners may recuse themselves and limits on informal conversations among members at a Sedona Historic Preservation Commission meeting.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Sedona council pauses mechanical upgrades at ranger station; commission discusses fans and floor sealing

Sedona commission compiles candidates for landmarking; owners and commissioners show interest in mid-century and adobe properties

Commissioners plan updated survey of Bridal Rigby House after rezoning pause

Sedona Historic Preservation Commission adopts 2025–26 work plan

Sedona commissioners receive refresher on open meetings and conflict-of-interest rules