[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6287515,"mediaKeyId","2551439-d764a234670acbd9925a9ce33ce24125","parentId",2551439,"title","HDC approvals and holds: platform lift, house modifications and other votes from March 11 meeting","audioSeconds",2880,"startMs",5400000,"endMs",8280000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2551439-d764a234670acbd9925a9ce33ce24125&start=5400&end=8280","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2551439-d764a234670acbd9925a9ce33ce24125/thumbnail_5400000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6287515/Nantucket-County/Massachusetts/HDC-approvals-and-holds-platform-lift-house-modifications-and-other-votes-from-March-11-meeting","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6287515-e0d5ed957c13e6857d7a6914d6818150/orig.mp4?Expires=1776417050&Signature=I2RV-MjHZ8RkR8adsiRmulH6TzsfCESqybIZ5d2qBEGwuy761WacSQ5R6z1D0wu46-fQIPZsvb7rttkcSHZpvPj3vN~eZ1q6d4g2p2UHjxslB6NmQXDmE1sGw8tlE6tu-MeHYEL2Rh3-e6zJBmrBdG8FsoYWlB7NdYdLCClUevsnEVDvE~eFZGXxzXWV7IBp64Zm8uGp07g8EMX2fDGT-1-36gR0ldl5NAzC3kLiKfLeU0CZ8-4jDi6Cp9jYUcTwMM7MlpGA46PTJ-MDIKOMYmMxqWhn8zjZ0R~GA4hvYvs45NHc4aY0JbO3qORDxGaN9r9x1nQ2xhtqBAVzIHe9SQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Town-County of Nantucket, MA","date","2025-03-12T00:37:51Z","article","Several additional agenda items received final action or were continued during the commission’s March 11 meeting. Highlights below list each item, the commission’s determination and the basic instruction to staff and applicants.

Votes at a glance

- 4 East Chestnut Street (platform lift): Approved as a test case. Vote 4‑in favor, 1 opposed (Angus). The commission accepted a temporary/test approval with the understanding the device would be re‑evaluated after the trial period.

- 11 Pine Street (fenestration and garage demolition/new garage/shed): The commission approved a package of changes to the main house with a modification on the north elevation fenestration (the French door configuration was to be revised); commissioners also approved the property’s replacement garage and a garden shed, and placed conditions requiring salvage/reuse of recoverable materials from the existing garage where feasible.

- 3 Pops Lane (infill/main house, garage demo and replacement, staff housing): After revisions the commission approved the main house design (commissioners endorsed an option of clipped gables and requested removal of two right‑most dormers), required deconstruction and reuse of salvageable materials from the existing garage rather than wholesale demolition, and approved the new garage and a small accessory shed. Approvals were recorded by voice vote and carried without recorded opposition.

- 27 Willard Street: Approved with the revisions discussed in the packet; commissioners had asked for modest dormer and window changes and the application passed.

- 85 Orange Street: Continued for revised existing‑conditions drawings and corrected roof plan; commissioners asked the applicant to resubmit accurate as‑built plans and to clarify hardscape scope before opening the application for a decision.

- 36 Tennessee Avenue and 4 East Lincoln Avenue: Continued for additional revisions requested by commissioners, including eave and fenestration modifications and clearer site sections and landscape context.

Why it matters: The votes reflect a mix — the HDC approved multiple new and replacement structures after design modifications but remained willing to require reuse of materials for demolition candidates and to hold files for additional information where existing‑conditions drawings or context were insufficient.

Next steps: Applicants with continuances were given specific follow‑up tasks (revised drawings, cross sections, clearer landscape plans), and staff set resubmission deadlines so items can return quickly on the next old‑business agenda.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Nantucket Historic District Commission - March 11, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Nantucket Historic District Commission voted on several permit applications: approved a platform lift as a test case, signed off on several house modifications, approved a large Madaket infill with minor changes and set holds on others pending revised drawings or additional outreach.","taxTitle","Nantucket County, Massachusetts","taxId",61456,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6287519,"Commission holds 2 Dukes Road case to give neighbors one month to find a new site for historic 'Daisy Hill'",420,3900000,4320000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2551439-d764a234670acbd9925a9ce33ce24125&start=3900&end=4320","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2551439-d764a234670acbd9925a9ce33ce24125/thumbnail_3900000.jpg","/articles/6287519/Nantucket-County/Massachusetts/Commission-holds-2-Dukes-Road-case-to-give-neighbors-one-month-to-find-a-new-site-for-historic-Daisy-Hill","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6287519-4b0821130724a98ce6aac8acf3e47ec7/orig.mp4?Expires=1776417050&Signature=YDoH7qLJI015Vz0baveYp8fnugFsyAVzN3H1knFa2reD3~thTqMzsk~o3~VdYEWOBnouAHA7xHAllDzbfao8k2Sznp975KmKPVIjjPje4IHNpjg-1jj4u4Lnje1ELveShSdqhpCNRoSxz5Ro3c6GoqfH7svTYjamNicN4hg-ngc0cMoOHVA76fFHXtkDRLbIwemlElh3zl-9MfjYDKAdn9viNGCRFCu6Q~MOYNv5PL7f5TOOOSDLbjHW2xw15i4iqdVCrjQmf-y8KF6VMHuXKGi1R1sBLmKMvVyE-lBFXhdunDDMKRzJKGDSgZHHpeBtd4IWW8hI50HCxoi6QXAfzg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Nantucket Historic District Commission on March 11 agreed to postpone a decision on a demolition request for a contributing house at 2 Dukes Road — locally known as “Daisy Hill” — and asked the owner to allow one month of additional outreach to find a relocation or reuse option.

Why it matters: Several longtime residents and preservation advocates urged the commission to preserve the house, describing it as an intact cottage with historical character and community meaning. Commission members said they were sympathetic but also noted the economic realities: multiple potential movers have inspected the structure and declined for cost reasons.

What the commission heard: Kathy Kelm Cronin, who lives nearby, described the house as having “a spirit” and urged commissioners to find a way to keep it. Patron representatives said the owner had prepared the building for transport — including raising it and placing it on dollies — and had shown it to several possible takers but that none had proceeded because of the cost and lack of suitable receiving sites.

After discussion the commission voted unanimously on a motion by Commissioner Abby to hold the application for 30 days and to publicize the availability of the building more broadly, giving preservation‑minded buyers or institutions a final opportunity to step forward. The motion carried without dissent.

Background and context: The property’s proponents said the owner has taken steps to make the house movable but that earlier interested parties found the cost or logistics prohibitive. Commissioners and members of the public suggested several potential paths — expanded advertising, outreach to local preservation nonprofits and housing groups, and a short holding period for intensified recruitment — rather than an immediate demolition approval.

Next steps: The application will be held for 30 days while the owner and commissioners pursue additional outreach. If no viable relocation or reuse plan is identified within that time, the owner may return with an amended proposal; the commission left the door open to revisit the matter sooner if a taker appears.","After several speakers urged saving the early‑20th‑century cottage known as ‘Daisy Hill,’ the HDC voted unanimously to delay action and asked the owner to re‑advertise the house for 30 days while the commission weighs options.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6287524,"Nantucket HDC pauses decision after neighbors say 8 North Mill was built 5 feet off approved site",2520,1140000,3660000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2551439-d764a234670acbd9925a9ce33ce24125&start=1140&end=3660","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2551439-d764a234670acbd9925a9ce33ce24125/thumbnail_1140000.jpg","/articles/6287524/Nantucket-County/Massachusetts/Nantucket-HDC-pauses-decision-after-neighbors-say-8-North-Mill-was-built-5-feet-off-approved-site","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6287524-089859713446cc26a05d956c524aeef0/orig.mp4?Expires=1776417050&Signature=IH883LbiPUgeWhonsBcQEMwanQhPO4jeSQ~J7UQ0Bb7YmWDWV8qGCwjZDFKAfHR8LGD1-pUZbKIOixhZ-PRiWdM8SSzEaqf-6vVyem7vXqQ5K~lgZbTT1Zr8tzcHzOiaPdzpOqF28lMeLY6LQYhERTNnAsLHhNtlC0UiVF3ynouWMR8oitED-E3ebZg0KThFiKKd0Py6pNiN3LwvxWr8MU9ZNhn4RiAN~FKnJOJXy1n~tEQpOX8L5VLX0KkfVPxwu20w-XGGKTOcO4a4PVDjQc0Y1FYBhevwIooFGuhseaLl4PvGEsqxxepO-rY3EBbhHoWYiieSHQrJNBnmGchCqw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Nantucket Historic District Commission on March 11 delayed deciding whether to validate the siting of a new house at 8 North Mill Street after neighbors and staff described an unapproved 5‑foot move toward Angola Street and raised questions about grading and a sewer easement.

The commission voted unanimously to perform an on‑site view to study the structure’s relationship to nearby lots and the street, and to return at a subsequent meeting with cross‑section drawings showing existing and proposed grades. Commissioners also voted unanimously to “track” a linked hardscape revision so that the house move and hardscape are considered together.

Why it matters: Abutters say the change reduces space for landscaping and raises concerns about how the house’s exposed foundation and added fill affect the streetscape. Staff said access limits inside a town sewer easement may prevent the privet and foundation plantings the applicant proposes as mitigation. The commission’s view and requested drawings are intended to give members material to determine whether the siting is appropriate under the HDC’s standards.

What was said: Chair Kathy opened the hearing by reminding attendees of the commission’s public‑hearing protocols and asking speakers to confine remarks to architectural appropriateness. Preservation planner Holly summarized staff’s review, noting the town’s Sewer Department had approved a reduction of a previously shown 10‑foot sewer easement to 5 feet, and warned that planting within the easement “may not be feasible” and that the revised landscape plan should clearly annotate that easement and planting limitations.

Abutter Fred Mueller, who said he and family members hold adjacent property, told the commission that the owner “poured the foundation and built the home 5 feet closer to Angola Street than specified in his approved plan” and said the relocation was done without an amended certificate of appropriateness and prompted a cease‑and‑desist letter.

Commissioners focused on visible effects: several members said photos and a site visit showed steeper slopes and more exposed foundation than expected and questioned whether a water‑struck brick veneer shown in the COA would be supported by the existing foundation condition. Commissioner Joe noted the project produces some benefits (greater separation between the main house and garage) but asked the applicant to demonstrate feasible mitigation where the sewer easement limits planting.

Outcome and next steps: The HDC unanimously voted to (1) conduct a site view to study the character and setting of the lot versus nearby properties and (2) require cross‑section drawings showing proposed vs. existing grades and the relationship of plantings to the sewer easement. The commission also decided to take up the later hardscape item together with the siting question at the next old‑business meeting.

Background details: The house was reviewed by the commission in 2023; the owner says they thought an earlier plan allowed the current location. Town building staff earlier issued a cease‑and‑desist after the foundation was poured. The applicant’s agent told the commission the foundation has since been tarred and backfilled and that some utilities were put underground as part of the work.","The Historic District Commission heard objections from abutters and staff about an unapproved five‑foot shift of a new house toward Angola Street, then voted to visit the site and return with cross‑section drawings and a review of sewer easement constraints.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

HDC approvals and holds: platform lift, house modifications and other votes from March 11 meeting

Commission holds 2 Dukes Road case to give neighbors one month to find a new site for historic 'Daisy Hill'

Nantucket HDC pauses decision after neighbors say 8 North Mill was built 5 feet off approved site