Montgomery County Council faces backlash on housing density changes and ZTA 25-02

Montgomery County Council members gathered on March 11, 2025, to discuss the proposed "Housing Now" package, which aims to address the county's affordable housing crisis. The meeting highlighted a mix of support and opposition from residents, reflecting deep community concerns about the implications of the proposed zoning text amendment (ZTA) 25-02.

Supporters of the initiative, including representatives from Habitat for Humanity, emphasized the need for reducing barriers to housing development. They argued that the ZTA is a crucial step toward implementing the Thrive Montgomery 2050 plan, which envisions a more integrated and accessible community. Advocates believe that increasing housing supply will promote affordable homeownership opportunities and provide certainty for builders.

However, significant opposition emerged from residents like Michelle Penn, who voiced strong concerns about the feasibility of the "15-minute city" concept within Montgomery County's existing suburban framework. Penn argued that the proposed density increases would exacerbate traffic congestion and strain local infrastructure, making it difficult for current residents to navigate their neighborhoods. She criticized the lack of community engagement in the planning process, stating that many residents felt blindsided by the proposals.

Roman Nelson echoed these sentiments, raising alarms about the transparency of the planning process and the potential for unequal application of zoning laws. He called for a pause on the ZTA until a comprehensive infrastructure impact study could be conducted, highlighting concerns about overcrowded schools and inadequate stormwater management systems.

Other residents, including Patricia Johnson and John Holden, expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of the proposed housing solutions, arguing that the majority of new units would be priced at market rates rather than providing affordable options for low-income families. They urged the council to focus on job creation and economic growth rather than rushing through housing legislation that may not adequately address the community's needs.

In contrast, Scott Goldberg from the Bethesda Chamber of Commerce advocated for the initiative, emphasizing the importance of expanding housing supply to ensure that future generations can afford to live in the county. He acknowledged the complexities of the housing market but expressed optimism that the council's deliberative process would refine the legislation.

As the council continues to navigate these discussions, the community remains divided on the best path forward. The meeting underscored the urgent need for a balanced approach that considers both the demand for affordable housing and the existing infrastructure challenges faced by Montgomery County residents. The council's next steps will be crucial in determining how these proposals will shape the future of housing in the area.