Alaska Senate considers bill for permanent standard time to end clock changes

The Senate Community and Regional Affairs Committee convened on March 11, 2025, to discuss Senate Bill 102, which proposes to exempt Alaska from the practice of Daylight Saving Time (DST). The bill aims to establish permanent standard time in the state, a move that supporters argue would enhance the mental and physical well-being of Alaskans and provide economic benefits by eliminating the biannual clock changes.

The discussion began with an overview of the history of Daylight Saving Time, noting that it has been observed in Alaska since 1966. Proponents of the bill highlighted the negative health impacts associated with the time change, citing studies from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine that link DST to increased risks of physical and mental health issues, as well as public safety concerns. The committee noted that several regions, including Arizona and Hawaii, have already opted out of DST, and neighboring states like Washington and Oregon are considering similar legislation.

Joe Hayes, a staff member for Senator Kawasaki, presented data showing that the disruption caused by changing clocks twice a year can lead to significant health risks, including cardiovascular issues and increased workplace injuries. He emphasized that adopting permanent standard time would align better with natural daylight patterns, particularly in northern regions like Alaska, where daylight hours vary dramatically throughout the year.

Senator Dunbar raised concerns about the unique challenges faced by different regions within Alaska, noting that the extreme variations in daylight can make the debate over DST less relevant. He pointed out that the most significant issue for Alaskans is the disruption caused by the time change itself, rather than the preference for morning or evening light.

Senator Kawasaki confirmed Dunbar's observations, stating that the health effects of the time change are well-documented and particularly detrimental to Alaskans. He noted that the rapid changes in daylight hours in the state exacerbate the negative impacts of DST.

The committee concluded the discussion by acknowledging the complexities of the issue and the potential benefits of moving to a permanent standard time. The next steps for the bill will involve further deliberation and potential voting in upcoming sessions.