The Town Council of Lewisville, NC, convened on December 1, 2024, to discuss significant changes to the electoral structure, particularly regarding the mayor's term length. The meeting centered around the proposal to shift from a four-year to a two-year term for the mayor, a topic that sparked considerable debate among council members.

The discussion began with a council member emphasizing the importance of a referendum, stating that ultimately, it is the residents who should decide on such matters. This sentiment highlighted a concern that the council had moved forward with the proposal without adequately consulting the community's views.

Several council members expressed their opinions on the proposed term length. One member argued that four years is excessive and unnecessary, suggesting that a two-year term would allow for more responsive governance. They pointed out that the town's staff, who manage daily operations, would remain unaffected by changes in elected officials, thus ensuring continuity in town management.

Concerns were raised about the implications of partisan elections, particularly the risk of a single party dominating the council and making drastic changes that could negatively impact the town. A member articulated fears that if a majority were to implement unpopular policies, residents would be stuck with those decisions for four years. They advocated for two-year terms as a safeguard against potential mismanagement and to encourage accountability among elected officials.

The council also reflected on the unique character of Lewisville, emphasizing the need to evaluate what is best for the town rather than simply following trends from other municipalities. The discussion acknowledged the upcoming election's potential upheaval due to the introduction of partisan politics, with members expressing concerns about the viability of unaffiliated candidates in a predominantly partisan environment.

As the meeting progressed, a motion was made to propose that if the citizens approve the referendum for staggered terms, the mayor should serve a two-year term instead of four. This motion received a second, indicating support for further deliberation on the matter.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the council's commitment to engaging with residents on critical electoral changes and the ongoing debate surrounding the structure of local governance. The council plans to continue discussions in the coming months, with the referendum poised to be a pivotal issue for the community.