The Town of Smithfield Council convened on December 17, 2024, to discuss various community concerns, primarily focusing on traffic impacts related to new developments in the area. The meeting featured a detailed examination of traffic flow, road capacity, and safety issues, particularly concerning the intersection of Pine Needle Shopping Center and Highway 301.

The discussion began with a resident expressing concerns about the capacity of the road and the potential for congestion during peak hours. The resident highlighted the difficulty of exiting the shopping center, especially when turning left onto Highway 301, which poses safety risks due to heavy traffic. The resident noted that while the road could handle a certain number of vehicles, the timing of traffic flow could lead to multiple cars attempting to exit simultaneously, creating hazardous conditions.

In response, Jason Hamilton, a traffic engineer, provided insights into the expected traffic patterns. He indicated that during the morning peak hour, only two vehicles from the new development would likely exit, suggesting that gaps in traffic would allow for safe exits. However, he acknowledged that the perception of traffic flow might differ from actual data, emphasizing that the projected numbers were based on the development's scale.

The conversation shifted to the overall impact of commercial developments, with Hamilton noting that fast food restaurants and other commercial entities typically generate more traffic than residential developments. This point raised further concerns about the adequacy of road infrastructure to accommodate increased traffic.

Another resident raised questions about the road's width and safety features, particularly regarding the absence of a median, which could help manage traffic flow. The council discussed the potential need for additional safety measures, especially considering the challenges posed by seasonal sun glare that could impair visibility for drivers.

As the meeting progressed, council members sought clarification on whether traffic assessments accounted for other developments in the area. Hamilton confirmed that the city had considered cumulative traffic impacts from multiple projects, ensuring a comprehensive approach to traffic management.

The session concluded with a call for further questions, but no additional comments were made regarding the traffic concerns. The council's discussions underscored the importance of addressing community safety and infrastructure needs as Smithfield continues to grow. The next steps will likely involve further evaluations of traffic patterns and potential recommendations for road improvements to enhance safety for all residents.