Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Lincoln residents accuse city attorney of harassment and mismanagement of zoning issues

March 26, 2024 | Lincoln, Placer County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Lincoln residents accuse city attorney of harassment and mismanagement of zoning issues
The Lincoln City Council meeting on March 26, 2024, focused on ongoing disputes involving residents and the city attorney, highlighting concerns over harassment and legal processes.

During the meeting, a resident expressed frustration over the actions of the city attorney, claiming that her family had been subjected to harassment through the distribution of signs on their property. The resident detailed that these signs, which included personal information, were placed multiple times despite requests for them to stop. She emphasized the emotional toll this situation has taken on her family, particularly her husband, who works as a psychologist in the community.

The resident also raised concerns about the financial burden incurred while seeking legal clarity regarding an appeal process related to a $100 fine, which ultimately cost her $5,000. She criticized the city attorney for not providing adequate support and for allowing what she described as bullying through citations and threats of prosecution regarding a wall on her property.

Another speaker echoed these sentiments, urging the council to exercise their oversight responsibilities over the city attorney and city manager. They argued that the council should seek to resolve disputes internally rather than allowing them to escalate to litigation, which they deemed unnecessary and costly for the city.

The council members, while acknowledging the residents' concerns, noted that certain matters were under litigation and could not be discussed in detail. They reiterated their commitment to addressing community issues but emphasized the limitations imposed by ongoing legal proceedings.

The meeting concluded with a call for the council to consider the residents' requests for resolution, highlighting the need for effective communication and conflict resolution within the city. The discussions underscored the ongoing tensions between residents and city officials, raising questions about the handling of legal matters and community relations in Lincoln.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal