Health care providers mandated to offer qualified sign language interpreters for deaf patients
March 12, 2025 | House Bills - Introduced, House Bills, 2025 House and Senate Bills, Nevada Legislation Bills, Nevada
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Nevada's Assembly Bill 395, introduced on March 12, 2025, aims to enhance accessibility for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing in healthcare settings. The bill mandates that healthcare providers ensure the availability of qualified sign language interpreters, either in-person or remotely, to facilitate effective communication during medical consultations.
Key provisions of AB395 stipulate that if a person requests an in-person interpreter or if the healthcare provider determines that remote interpreting is inadequate, the provider must supply an in-person interpreter. This requirement is designed to ensure that patients receive the necessary support to understand their healthcare options fully. Additionally, if remote interpreting is deemed sufficient, patients must provide informed consent to proceed with that option.
The bill addresses significant gaps in communication that can arise in healthcare environments, where misunderstandings can lead to inadequate care or misdiagnoses. By establishing clear guidelines for interpreter availability, AB395 seeks to improve health outcomes for the deaf and hard of hearing community in Nevada.
Debate surrounding the bill has highlighted concerns about the costs associated with hiring in-person interpreters and the potential strain on healthcare resources. However, advocates argue that the benefits of clear communication far outweigh these concerns, emphasizing the ethical obligation to provide equitable healthcare access.
The implications of AB395 extend beyond immediate healthcare access; it reflects a broader commitment to inclusivity and equal rights for individuals with disabilities. Experts suggest that successful implementation of this bill could serve as a model for other states, potentially influencing national standards for healthcare accessibility.
As the legislative process continues, stakeholders are closely monitoring the bill's progress, anticipating its potential to reshape healthcare interactions for a vulnerable segment of the population. The next steps will involve discussions on funding and resource allocation to ensure that the provisions of AB395 can be effectively realized in practice.
Key provisions of AB395 stipulate that if a person requests an in-person interpreter or if the healthcare provider determines that remote interpreting is inadequate, the provider must supply an in-person interpreter. This requirement is designed to ensure that patients receive the necessary support to understand their healthcare options fully. Additionally, if remote interpreting is deemed sufficient, patients must provide informed consent to proceed with that option.
The bill addresses significant gaps in communication that can arise in healthcare environments, where misunderstandings can lead to inadequate care or misdiagnoses. By establishing clear guidelines for interpreter availability, AB395 seeks to improve health outcomes for the deaf and hard of hearing community in Nevada.
Debate surrounding the bill has highlighted concerns about the costs associated with hiring in-person interpreters and the potential strain on healthcare resources. However, advocates argue that the benefits of clear communication far outweigh these concerns, emphasizing the ethical obligation to provide equitable healthcare access.
The implications of AB395 extend beyond immediate healthcare access; it reflects a broader commitment to inclusivity and equal rights for individuals with disabilities. Experts suggest that successful implementation of this bill could serve as a model for other states, potentially influencing national standards for healthcare accessibility.
As the legislative process continues, stakeholders are closely monitoring the bill's progress, anticipating its potential to reshape healthcare interactions for a vulnerable segment of the population. The next steps will involve discussions on funding and resource allocation to ensure that the provisions of AB395 can be effectively realized in practice.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill