[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6637806,"mediaKeyId","2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea","parentId",2578751,"title","Votes at a glance: key House floor outcomes, March 11, 2025","audioSeconds",226,"startMs",2513000,"endMs",2739000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea&start=2513&end=2739","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea/thumbnail_2513000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6637806/Arizona/Votes-at-a-glance-key-House-floor-outcomes-March-11-2025","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6637806-f44a0f5c279f09c01ae18dd5174d2662/orig.mp4?Expires=1773580101&Signature=NuvlTU8u4J6VOSBwM3Ztnx6ftNeIAIbxds1WazMfEIm7y9X0UOQ9Cj-mH-rtgxH0uGM4cmAyOIXj0-u4f4BFmXKwKWywtlHcd8sOmo1tD5vzhKIV--NjIKZXulwXIhZ5er259P0t-nH9Xw963HQKbMju8vuZz8x8vWVjQcWF15EbsCCJ7EUMWe5ViAnAqDTeZTKNJONNpl7FFgHCMwjN4xjd1GCRsFzk3uaJaNsVGxwpfN0w5Geb4ZimHrrnZ0H5CDmCQh3M6iUjI-5m40pKRbboAkxH~gnWYqXJd3rXIKntAkonP-6ICqX56l6dfCt4s6FTVQRzCnUmdbqSguEUEQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Arizona Legislature","date","2025-03-11T00:00:00Z","article","The Arizona House recorded multiple third-reading votes on March 11, 2025. Below are the principal outcomes reported on the floor and in the clerk’s recorded tallies.

House Bill 25 74 (land division; voluntary rural housing mechanism) — Passed on third reading. Clerk recorded 31 ayes, 26 nays, 3 not voting. Representative Griffin explained his aye vote noting the change pertains to non-active-management and rural areas and is voluntary.

House Bill 2,190 (interstate dental licensure compact) — Passed on third reading. Clerk recorded 34 ayes, 23 nays, 3 not voting. Floor debate addressed practitioner portability and disciplinary authority; opponents raised concerns about clinical-exam requirements and reporting of disciplinary history.

House Bill 2,609 (school curricula) — Failed on third reading. Clerk recorded 19 ayes, 38 nays, 3 not voting.

House Bill 27 36 (cybersecurity; encryption/audit framework) — Passed on third reading. Clerk recorded 35 ayes, 22 nays, 3 not voting. Members noted outstanding technical questions from DEMA and urged continued work before the Senate.

House Bill 27 86 (excessive speed measures) — Failed on third reading. Clerk recorded 26 ayes, 31 nays, 3 not voting.

House Concurrent Resolution 20 25 (constitutional amendment: 60% threshold for amendments) — Passed and will be transmitted to the Senate; clerk recorded 31 ayes, 26 nays, 3 not voting.

House Concurrent Resolution 20 53 (constitutional amendment: legislative arrest/privilege changes) — Passed and will be transmitted to the Senate; clerk recorded 37 ayes, 20 nays, 3 not voting.

Several other bills were placed on the calendar, referred to committees or had reports entered into the journal; bills taken up by the Committee of the Whole and adopted earlier in the day (for example HB 26 79 and HB 29 27) were referred to engrossing for third-read preparation.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","03/11/2025 - House Floor Session","oneSentenceSummary","Summary of third-reading votes on multiple bills and concurrent resolutions taken on the Arizona House floor, including final tallies where recorded.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature Arizona, Arizona","taxId",78572,"location","Arizona","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6637811,"House approves open-meetings amendment including 120-day AG response provision",248,1906000,2154000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea&start=1906&end=2154","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea/thumbnail_1906000.jpg","/articles/6637811/Arizona/House-approves-open-meetings-amendment-including-120-day-AG-response-provision","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6637811-6a4655d24c6952b482c58f10afa954d4/orig.mp4?Expires=1773580101&Signature=an6AXPGnr6S1sJBg3FxWd~Q6EKqUCTkr4zm8R49CGMKAnJLPvzPzk93SCq6Bo4Gkqr~N2XJsmMF6ukJ59INH98cDeeQ4BQGlOCYNwXIkKuu5MXGQfbqwmnLObbcFnkoGPWfJUAH~W0Viv5ID9GbKvoqldfPA2GHowb5EGtYDpHjlVOrUnAcfScIdDF4aBXN-MDueMycaxjUkf34JEdNbiE6yE-oDe0MFrUmsc6BmHimv4v-WhnKtnJ6uBbyMJ2akcCL0~9zmKjtDiFEKunVz4bk7WKfESSdBOuYBxXUHn~NcpjIc3RJhxQ1xJZofSuQvUbcplhgWSrS5nMTFCEhMtA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Arizona House passed House Bill 29 27 as amended on the floor after members and sponsors described negotiations with county stakeholders and the attorney general’s office.

Majority Leader Ben Carbone moved a floor amendment that removed public-records provisions and narrowed the measure to open meetings-related changes; he said counties were neutral after negotiations. Members questioned whether the attorney general’s office would be able to meet a 120-day requirement to respond to complaints about public meetings and whether the requirement would require an appropriation or new staff. The majority leader said the amendment requires the attorney general to respond within 120 days but that no appropriation was included; he offered to work with colleagues on potential resource questions before third read in the Senate.

After brief questions on the floor, members voted to pass HB 29 27 as amended. Sponsors said they would continue to consult with the AG’s office and counties before the next stage.","House Bill 29 27, focused on open meetings and related procedures, passed as amended; members discussed a requirement for the attorney general to respond to complaints within 120 days and whether that needs an appropriation.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6637814,"House approves cybersecurity bill after debate over oversight and amendments",517,4043000,4560000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea&start=4043&end=4560","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea/thumbnail_4043000.jpg","/articles/6637814/Arizona/House-approves-cybersecurity-bill-after-debate-over-oversight-and-amendments","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6637814-c04842e6feca75f7f36180703b72ea01/orig.mp4?Expires=1773580101&Signature=ixQlCsIgfZa-B8VQXC5vzp4HpxCsNsHKItU-nAHLUl4hriNMHhNNNutUvNSnJ0XgbBRLfvBa9qstZyd5h7bg~Tzk23hs06z~2t6qz8S~RO3HZICvzA2MvEF~nATNsKo-qTcVY9TYpw59f2DfIgwPMVkcpZVl0hkEtOFyLL9t0ik7nt3pHjkIyz~eaRp2KOQOKFzTRhrBkv~mt6u9WraMRDrRXoo-SGWkWDDZc98~lz4qY0VsxMzYU0-MJUfoIFZFQWPa~m4vmoBgW~2wwF0opEEKux4t6Y5i76Xwzcus3ykbe7s8RRsSrKac35uUAQhEmAYy8JwNZNCHDZ7kRLqKmA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Arizona House passed House Bill 27 36 on third reading after members debated the bill’s technical standards and which entity should hold oversight responsibility.

Sponsor and proponents said the bill requires improved encryption systems and an auditable metadata trail for state systems, and that the state must update cyber procurement and review practices. Representative Gillette argued the measure would modernize state practices, including auditability of user changes and system MAC addresses, and criticized current internal reporting arrangements that keep findings within executive agencies.

Opponents and at least one witness urged continued engagement with Arizona Department of Emergency and Military Affairs (DEMA). Representative Marquez noted DEMA still had outstanding concerns and asked the sponsor to work with DEMA as the bill moves to the Senate. Representative Cabarro and others acknowledged the bill’s intent to strengthen cybersecurity but said amendments shifted some implementation authority to the legislature and urged further expert review in the upper chamber.

The House recorded passage on third reading with a tally recorded in the transcript as 35 ayes, 22 nays and 3 not voting. Supporters said the bill moves state cybersecurity toward stronger encryption and auditable trails; critics asked for more technical review and clearer executive-branch oversight mechanisms.","House Bill 27 36, authorizing an encryption and audit framework and establishing implementation responsibilities, passed the House after members debated oversight, existing state cybersecurity structures and DEMA concerns.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6637819,"House advances securitization bill with guardrails after floor amendments",995,896000,1891000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea&start=896&end=1891","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2578751-05b797af123493d9964802a2a282cbea/thumbnail_896000.jpg","/articles/6637819/Arizona/House-advances-securitization-bill-with-guardrails-after-floor-amendments","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6637819-db91a4514f71ae7e395d2fe552114388/orig.mp4?Expires=1773580101&Signature=JwzlUJM0Dgb~QkjSdZ5bcKkWDNYuhmOlryyMcF4ZP00uRoWNZYOw68GR87L9mfwN9hXcTIVkcjS6vUIdIPxiAaIBX1oaaz6Qod9kV--Wz0LYKtvNjL9RxAO3NT~iWJmEnuHmfyt9XEe7TXfxz3CdoJCn1HGxK0CIlkfzbwrYlLXdShfwMMJ0fRMw57yr8wbdqX8kaEKlaAOsTutfvWDoIv7WisFzcbSmcjeSiX5HeQaNITPPQoGEZSYY9Fc0QhR-dxNZt2m6KnVoYmU2Xo~~VhP4aOnvIxH6HY5S9Ao9LUIua4OYl49bEzFYEu8GB2Jv5K7RXs70JrcQyAh8C9YoDw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Arizona House on the floor adopted House Bill 26 79 as amended, approving a securitization framework that members said is intended to free up lower-cost financing for utilities while adding new consumer protections.

The bill originally authorized broad securitization authority for electric utilities. Lawmakers debated multiple floor amendments focused on limiting which costs may be securitized and on strengthening review by regulators. Supporters said the changes preserve potential savings for ratepayers while opponents said the original draft was too sweeping.

Representative Vince Leach (Republican), the bill sponsor (Representative Griffin served as floor sponsor during committee), moved the bill through the Committee of the Whole and onto the floor; Representative Matthew Mathis offered two significant floor amendments aimed at tightening consumer protections. Mathis’s second amendment, which would have shortened securitization financing windows to five years and barred securitization of existing fuel and purchased power costs, failed on a division, with the tally recorded as 20 ayes and 36 nays.

Representative Paul Gress offered an amendment later adopted that imposes several constraints: fuel-cost securitization would be limited to narrow circumstances such as supply shortages, transportation disruptions, market volatility or substantial unanticipated load growth; the Arizona Corporation Commission (the commission) must make a finding that a significant event occurred to permit securitization for fuel; any securitization tied to retiring a plant must demonstrate that replacement resources provide net savings and at least equal resource adequacy; and entities affiliated with a utility are prohibited from buying bonds issued in the transaction. Supporters including Representatives Olson and Gress said those guardrails put the bill squarely “in the best interest of ratepayers.” Opponents warned the original draft could allow broad transfers of utility costs onto ratepayers if left unchecked.

After the Gress amendment was adopted, members voted to pass HB 26 79 as amended. The House action sends the amended bill to engrossing and then to the Senate.","Lawmakers approved House Bill 26 79 as amended, a bill that allows utilities to use securitization for certain costs but adds new guardrails narrowing when and how securitization may be used.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: key House floor outcomes, March 11, 2025

House approves open-meetings amendment including 120-day AG response provision

House approves cybersecurity bill after debate over oversight and amendments

House advances securitization bill with guardrails after floor amendments