Summit County residents voiced strong concerns during a special council meeting on November 7, 2024, regarding the proposed development by Dakota Pacific. Community members expressed frustration over the potential impact of increased density on local infrastructure, particularly roads, which they believe are already struggling to accommodate current traffic levels.

Donna, a local resident, questioned why Dakota Pacific is not being held accountable for contributing to necessary infrastructure improvements if they wish to increase development density. Her comments reflect a broader sentiment among residents who feel that developers should share the responsibility for the community's infrastructure needs.

Karen Balish, a business owner and resident, passionately argued that the proposed development threatens the unique character of Park City, which is known for its mining town heritage and ski culture. She warned that the changes could drive away both tourists and residents, ultimately harming the local economy. Balish emphasized the importance of preserving the town's brand and questioned the council's alignment with community interests over those of developers.

Eric Moxham, a founding member of Friends for Responsive Development for Greater Park City, highlighted the contentious history of the land in question, noting that previous attempts to develop it faced significant community opposition. He criticized the council for considering further development without addressing existing traffic issues and urged them to wait for state transportation assessments before making decisions.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between development interests and community preservation, with residents calling for more transparency and accountability from their elected officials. As discussions continue, the council faces the challenge of balancing growth with the needs and desires of the community, particularly as Park City prepares for the upcoming Olympics and the associated influx of visitors.