Residents oppose Gibson Solar project citing ethics and environmental concerns in King George

In the heart of King George County, Virginia, a heated discussion unfolded during the recent Planning Commission meeting on March 11, 2025. Residents gathered to voice their concerns over the proposed Gibson Solar project, a solar farm that has sparked significant opposition among local citizens.

As the meeting commenced, the air was thick with apprehension. One resident, expressing frustration over a lack of communication from the developers, highlighted three primary concerns. The first was the perceived unethical business practices of Gibson Solar Open Road Renewables. The speaker noted that despite claims of community engagement, many nearby residents, including themselves, had not been contacted. This sentiment resonated with others in attendance, who echoed similar experiences of being left in the dark.

The second concern raised was the project's alignment with the county's comprehensive plan for the Rappahannock River South rural development area. The resident argued that the solar farm contradicts the county's vision for preserving its agricultural heritage and natural landscapes. They emphasized the area's rich farmland and vital waterways, warning that the project could disrupt local ecosystems and wildlife habitats.

Finally, the speaker cautioned against setting a precedent for future developments. They warned that granting special exemptions for this project could lead to a flood of similar requests, jeopardizing the county's rural character and agricultural integrity. The mention of local wildlife, including the American bald eagle and even an albino owl, underscored the community's deep connection to the land and its natural history.

Another resident, Heather Hall, added her voice to the opposition, stressing the importance of reviewing the special exception permit on a case-by-case basis. She pointed out that the project could disturb hundreds of acres of forested land, contradicting the county's zoning ordinances aimed at protecting such areas. Hall urged the commission to consider the long-term implications of their decision, emphasizing that the standards set today would shape the future of King George County.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the community's concerns were not just about a single solar project but about the broader implications for land use and environmental stewardship in King George. The residents left the meeting with a sense of urgency, hoping their voices would resonate with the Planning Commission as they deliberate on the future of their cherished landscape. The outcome of this meeting could very well determine the path forward for development in this rural enclave, balancing progress with preservation.