Prince Edward County Supervisors weigh approval of Gabriel Solar Project amid mixed community response

The March 11, 2025, Board of Supervisors meeting in Prince Edward County, Virginia, centered around a proposed solar project that has sparked significant community debate. The Gabriel Solar Project, which aims to establish an 80-megawatt solar facility with battery energy storage, was the focal point of discussions, highlighting the intersection of energy development, property rights, and environmental concerns.

Supporters of the project, including representatives from EnergyRite, emphasized its potential benefits for the community. They noted that the project would not only enhance energy security but also create approximately 300 construction jobs during its estimated nine to twelve-month build phase. The strategic location near an existing Dominion Energy substation was highlighted as a factor that would minimize additional infrastructure demands on the county, thereby enhancing the project's cost-effectiveness.

Several local farmers and landowners voiced their support, citing personal experiences with solar projects that have allowed them to graze livestock and maintain agricultural productivity. They argued that solar farms can coexist with farming practices, providing economic opportunities while contributing to clean energy goals. One farmer shared his success with sheep farming on solar land, stating that the arrangement has been beneficial for both his livestock and the environment.

However, opposition to the project was equally vocal, with numerous residents expressing concerns about the long-term impacts of solar farms on property values and the local environment. Critics raised issues regarding the efficiency of solar energy, citing recent weather events that challenged the reliability of solar power. They also pointed to potential negative effects on wildlife and the landscape, arguing that solar installations could disrupt the agricultural heritage of the area.

A notable point of contention was the perceived lack of transparency and accountability from the solar developer, Energex. Some residents referenced a lawsuit against the company related to a previous solar project, alleging that it caused noise and environmental disturbances that significantly affected neighboring properties. This raised alarms about the potential for similar issues should the Gabriel Solar Project proceed.

The meeting concluded with a call for the Board of Supervisors to carefully consider the implications of granting a conditional use permit for the solar project. Stakeholders urged the board to weigh the economic benefits against the potential risks to property rights and community well-being. As the discussion continues, the outcome of this project could set a precedent for future energy developments in Prince Edward County, reflecting broader tensions between renewable energy initiatives and local agricultural interests.