Prince Edward County residents oppose Gabriel Energy's solar farm proposal

In the heart of Prince Edward County, Virginia, the Board of Supervisors meeting on March 11, 2025, became a battleground for community voices opposing a proposed solar and battery storage project by Gabriel Energy. As residents gathered, the air was thick with concern over the potential environmental and aesthetic impacts of the project, which would cover over 1,200 acres of land, including 600 acres of timberland.

One resident, speaking passionately, highlighted the personal stakes involved. “From where I stood and took my vows to my husband 21 years ago, I’m going to be able to see solar panels now, and that’s not fair,” she lamented, emphasizing the emotional connection her family has to their land. This sentiment resonated with many in attendance, who expressed fears that the solar farm would disrupt the scenic views and rural character that define their community.

Another speaker, Devin Rank, raised questions about the transparency of the project’s announcement, noting that many neighbors were unaware of the plans. “There isn’t a sign on our road advertising it at all,” he pointed out, suggesting that the community had not been adequately informed about the implications of the solar site. He also voiced concerns about the energy produced, stating that it would not benefit local residents but instead supply power to a contract with Google for their data centers.

Chantry Reich echoed these worries, arguing that the project would destroy wildlife habitats, including those of protected species like bald eagles. “Who wants bald eagles extinct? Not me,” he declared, urging the supervisors to consider the ecological consequences of their decision. His call for research into the local wildlife and the potential impact of the solar panels was met with nods of agreement from the audience.

As the meeting progressed, Brian Zahn, another local resident, reinforced the idea that the land designated for the solar project was meant for conservation, not industrial use. “This is not agricultural; it’s agricultural conservation,” he asserted, highlighting the importance of protecting the area’s natural resources and water quality.

The overwhelming sentiment among the speakers was a plea for the Board of Supervisors to reject the proposal, reflecting a community united in its desire to preserve the character and environment of Prince Edward County. As the meeting concluded, the future of the Gabriel Energy project remained uncertain, but the voices of concerned residents had made it clear: they are ready to fight for their land and its legacy.