The Washington Senate Ways & Means Committee convened on March 13, 2025, to discuss a proposed substitute for Senate Bill 5,737, which aims to amend the National Board for Professional Standards Certificate and adjust bonuses for certified instructional staff. The bill, initially requested by the Office of Financial Management, proposes significant reductions in annual bonuses for educators holding this prestigious certification.
Starting in the 2025-2026 school year, the annual bonus for certified instructional staff with National Board Certification (NBC) will decrease from $5,000 to $3,000, with future increases tied to inflation. This change is expected to yield substantial state savings, estimated at $37.6 million in fiscal year 2027 and $115 million over the next four years. The reductions will affect approximately 7,700 certificated staff statewide, including 3,000 educators in high-poverty schools.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free During the meeting, public testimony highlighted strong opposition to the proposed cuts. Educators and superintendents expressed concerns that reducing these stipends undermines the value of the rigorous certification process and could lead to a decline in teacher retention, particularly in high-need areas. Many speakers emphasized that the stipends are not merely bonuses but essential components of educators' salaries that recognize their expertise and commitment to student success.
Melissa Gumboski, representing several superintendents, acknowledged the difficult budget decisions facing the committee but urged members to consider alternatives to cutting educator pay. Larry Delaney, president of the Washington Education Association, argued that the proposed reductions would devalue the teaching profession and negatively impact student learning outcomes.
Testimonies from various educators underscored the importance of maintaining the current stipend structure, with many asserting that the financial support is crucial for attracting and retaining high-quality teachers in challenging environments. They warned that cuts to these stipends could exacerbate existing teacher shortages and harm students, particularly those from low-income backgrounds.
As the committee moves forward, the implications of this proposed legislation remain significant for Washington's educators and the students they serve. The discussions reflect a broader concern about the state's commitment to supporting its teaching workforce during challenging budgetary times. The committee's decision will ultimately shape the future of educational quality and equity across the state.