Cobble Hill Development seeks zoning relief for two Hemlock Avenue projects

The Cranston City Plan Commission convened on February 4, 2025, to discuss two significant applications from Cobble Hill Development LLC, both aimed at addressing housing needs in the community. The proposals, which received positive recommendations from city staff, are expected to enhance residential options in the area.

The first application involves the construction of a single-family dwelling at 0 Hemlock Avenue. The developer is seeking relief for reduced lot frontage and width, which is necessary due to the unique characteristics of the merged lots. City staff noted that the proposal aligns with the city’s zoning regulations and comprehensive plan, emphasizing that it would not disrupt the neighborhood's character. Approximately 52% of nearby residential parcels have similar nonconforming frontages, indicating that this development is consistent with local patterns.

The second application pertains to an existing single-family home and accessory garage at 27 Hemlock Avenue. This request aims to establish zoning compliance following the merger of lots. Staff highlighted that the existing structure is generally consistent with the surrounding area, where many properties exhibit nonconforming setbacks. The proposed changes are seen as a way to support neighborhood housing needs without altering the community's character.

Both applications were met with support from the commissioners, who recognized the importance of increasing housing availability in light of ongoing discussions about the local housing crisis. Commissioner Wayne Zulli expressed his full support, noting that the proposals align with the city’s goals for residential land use.

In addition to the Cobble Hill applications, the commission also reviewed a proposal from Dr. Joyce Martin to convert a commercial building at 1040 Cranston Avenue into a rooming and boarding house. While the proposal was deemed inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, staff recommended approval, citing the need for temporary housing options in the area. The facility is expected to serve underserved populations, providing a unique housing opportunity.

However, the proposal faced opposition from local residents, as voiced by Ward 3 Councilman Andy Andujar, who expressed concerns about the potential impact on the neighborhood. He indicated that residents were not in favor of state licensing for the facility, highlighting the need for further community engagement before moving forward.

As the commission moves ahead with these applications, the outcomes will play a crucial role in shaping Cranston's housing landscape, addressing both immediate needs and long-term community goals. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential adjustments based on community feedback and zoning requirements.