In the heart of Santa Ana, a palpable tension filled the air as community members gathered at the city council meeting on February 4, 2025. The atmosphere was charged with urgency and hope, as residents voiced their concerns over the safety and well-being of immigrant families in the face of rising anti-immigration sentiments.
Maria, a passionate advocate and mother, stood before the council, her voice steady yet filled with emotion. She expressed her fears for her family and friends, highlighting the anxiety that many in the immigrant community feel about potential deportations. “We are in a sanctuary city, but what does that really mean?” she questioned, reflecting a growing sentiment among residents who feel that the current sanctuary policies lack the necessary support and protection.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The focal point of the evening was agenda item 21, which proposed the revival of the Sanctuary Policy Advisory Group. This group, originally established in 2017, aimed to foster trust and transparency between the city and its immigrant residents. Maria, along with other speakers, urged the council to reinstate this group to ensure that the voices of the immigrant community are heard and that their rights are protected.
Anna Charco, representing Latino Health Access, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the fear and uncertainty that permeate immigrant communities. “Many families live with the constant worry of separation,” she stated, underscoring the detrimental impact of the current political climate on public health and community cohesion. Charco called for the council to prioritize the reinstatement of the advisory group as a crucial step toward reaffirming Santa Ana’s commitment to its immigrant residents.
Mai Nguyen Do, a research and policy manager, brought attention to the need for a separate discussion regarding the city’s Immigration Legal Defense Fund. She highlighted the gaps in outreach and services, particularly for the Southeast Asian refugee community, advocating for a restructuring of the fund before it is tied to the sanctuary policy discussions.
As the meeting progressed, Carlo, a doctoral candidate at UC Irvine, shared his insights on the meaning of sanctuary. He urged the council to expand the definition of sanctuary beyond mere symbolism, advocating for concrete protections for undocumented immigrants in their daily lives. “Everyone deserves a sanctuary,” he declared, emphasizing that a more inclusive approach would strengthen the city’s commitment to safety and support for all residents.
The evening concluded with a sense of determination among the speakers and council members alike. The discussions illuminated the urgent need for policies that not only protect immigrant rights but also foster a sense of belonging and security within the community. As Santa Ana navigates these complex issues, the voices of its residents serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of unity and support in the face of adversity.